Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Sentence First, Verdict Later!

By Christian White & Todd Dawson on February 14, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

NLRB Orders Employer To Grant Undetermined Wage Increase

These days, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) just gets curiouser and curiouser.

In one of its latest adventures on the other side of the looking glass, the Board held that a hospitality employer violated the law by failing to provide a wage increase to employees who had recently unionized. The employer and the union had started negotiations on an initial labor agreement but had not agreed on an economic package. In the meantime, the employer granted wage increases to nonunion employees, but not to the employees whose wages were subject to negotiation with the union. While it may seem obvious (at least to those who didn’t write the Board’s majority decision), it’s a little weird to grant increases to employees when those increases are in the process of, you know, being negotiated. Just saying.

Refusing to be troubled by such details, the Board held that the employer should have granted a wage increase to the unionized employees during bargaining because the company had an “established past practice” of granting wage increases on an annual basis. But here’s the really odd part – the Board couldn’t tell how much of a wage increase the unionized employees should have received.

It turns out that the employer’s purportedly “established past practice” of granting wage increases varied from year to year in terms of the amount of the increase, the calculation of the increase (i.e., a percentage vs. a uniform amount) and the factors considered in determining the increase amount. So there was no way for the Board to determine the amount of the increase that was (in the Board’s view) unlawfully withheld. Undaunted, the Board ordered the employer to grant a wage increase and said it’ll figure out the amount at a later stage of the case.

Yes, you read that correctly.

Takeaways: The Board continues to move in a decidedly anti-employer direction. Employers therefore must be thoughtful and strategic in their approach to negotiations and other labor relations issues.

Photo of Christian White Christian White
Read more about Christian WhiteEmailChristian's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Todd Dawson Todd Dawson
Read more about Todd DawsonEmailTodd's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor, Featured Posts
  • Blog:
    The Bargaining Table
  • Organization:
    Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • LaborLess Blog
  • Scott Technology Attorneys Blog
  • Joe Raczynski | Technologist
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19): Guidance for Businesses
  • GovCon & Trade
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo