Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Booted out of Indiana: Indiana DOR finds that parent holding company has no nexus for combined return

By Elizabeth Cha & Cyavash Ahmadi on March 29, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Indiana Department of Revenue found that a holding company was properly excluded as a member of its affiliates’ financial institutions tax (FIT) combined group return because the company failed to establish nexus with the state.  The Department also decided that for purposes of the FIT, there is no distinction between business and nonbusiness income.

Under Indiana’s FIT combined group return rules, taxpayers that do not have nexus with the state are excluded from a combined group return. The holding company contended that it had nexus with Indiana through its membership interest in a wholly owned limited liability company that engages in broker/dealer services and is a disregarded entity from the holder company for income tax purposes.

But the Department of Revenue rejected this argument, explaining that although the broker/dealer had one employee located within Indiana, the broker/dealer had no offices in Indiana (its employee worked from other affiliate offices) and, during the tax years at issue, it earned no Indiana receipts. Further, the Department found that inclusion of the holding company in the FIT combined group return would not fairly represent the combined group’s income attributable to Indiana. The Department found that the broker/dealer’s activities within Indiana were de minimis, but that inclusion of the holding company in the FIT combined group return would have an outsized impact on the combined group’s adjusted gross income.

The Department then rejected taxpayer’s contention that income from its subsidiary’s sale of stock in another company was improperly included in the FIT tax base. Citing the business/nonbusiness income distinction under Indiana’s Adjusted Gross Income Tax, the taxpayer argued that income from such sale should have been allocated to the state of the subsidiary’s domicile. The Department disagreed, and concluded that there is no business/nonbusiness distinction under Indiana’s FIT. The Department noted that, under the FIT, adjusted gross income is determined by reference to the federal definition of taxable income under Internal Revenue Code § 63 and does not incorporate the business/nonbusiness income provisions found in Indiana’s gross income tax provision.

Letter of Findings 18-20210085, Indiana Department of State Revenue (Nov. 18, 2021).

Photo of Elizabeth Cha Elizabeth Cha
Read more about Elizabeth ChaEmail
Photo of Cyavash Ahmadi Cyavash Ahmadi
Read more about Cyavash AhmadiEmail
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    SALT Shaker
  • Organization:
    Eversheds Sutherland LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo