Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act – Five Key Takeaways

By Amy E. Lott & Ruth Ann Daniels on April 19, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Businessman pestering female colleague in the workplace.

On March 3, 2022, President Biden signed into law the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (the Act), prohibiting employers from enforcing predispute arbitration agreements and class action waivers that concern sexual harassment and sexual assault claims.  The Act amends the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) with respect to the arbitration of disputes involving sexual assault and sexual harassment.

Key Terms

The Act applies to two types of agreements – predispute arbitration agreements and predispute joint-action waivers (together, Predispute Agreements) – to the extent they govern sexual assault and sexual harassment disputes:

  • A “predispute arbitration agreement” is an agreement to arbitrate that is entered into before a sexual assault dispute or sexual harassment dispute arises. It can be a standalone agreement or a provision within a broader agreement, and it can be signed at the outset of an employer-employee relationship or during the course of it.
  • A “predispute joint-action waiver” is an agreement that is made before a dispute arises, pursuant to which one of the parties (typically the employee) waives the right to participate in, or is prohibited from participating in, any joint, class, or collective action involving a sexual assault or sexual harassment dispute. Such waivers can be included in arbitration agreements or be standalone agreements, and although they are frequently signed at the beginning of an employer-employee relationship, they can be executed during the course of the relationship.

The Act defines a “sexual assault dispute” as a dispute involving a nonconsensual sexual act or sexual contact, as such terms are defined in 18 U.S.C. 2246 or similar state or tribunal law (including when the victim lacks the capacity to consent), and it defines a “sexual harassment dispute” as a dispute relating to conduct alleged to constitute sexual harassment under applicable federal, state, or tribal law.

Five Key Takeaways

Here are five things employers need to know about the Act:

  1. The Act does not invalidate existing Predispute Agreements; rather it gives employees alleging sexual assault or sexual harassment the option to invalidate them and bars employers from enforcing them. The Act preserves an employee’s right to choose to arbitrate his or her claims pursuant to a predispute arbitration agreement.
  2. The Act only applies to pre-dispute agreements and waivers. Accordingly, if an employer and an employee enter into an agreement to arbitrate a sexual assault or sexual harassment dispute after the claim arises, that agreement can still be enforced, subject to applicable state law.
  3. The Act only applies to claims and disputes that arise or accrue on or after March 3, 2022, the date of the Act’s enactment. Employers may continue to enforce existing Predispute Agreements that arose or accrued prior to that date.
  4. Predispute arbitration agreements and class action waivers can still be implemented and enforced with respect to claims that do not involve sexual assault or sexual harassment, such as claims for breach of contract, discrimination and retaliation.
  5. Disputes regarding the applicability of the Act to a particular claim will be determined by a court applying federal law, rather than an arbitrator, regardless of what the contract says.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

For a more detailed analysis of this legislation, including important considerations for employers who have or are considering arbitration agreements and class action waivers with their workforce, please see this the prior article issued by Gray Reed’s labor and employment group.

Photo of Amy E. Lott Amy E. Lott

With clients ranging from corporations, partnerships and entrepreneurs to family offices, investment companies and individual investors, Amy Lott focuses her practice on structuring a wide variety of transactions, including stock and asset acquisitions, mergers, private placements, joint ventures and financings.

Read more about Amy E. LottEmail
Photo of Ruth Ann Daniels Ruth Ann Daniels

Ruth Ann Daniels is Chair of the Labor and Employment Department. With over 30 years of experience as both a trial lawyer and legal advisor for employers in Texas and across the country, she has handled every adversarial and operational matter that can…

Ruth Ann Daniels is Chair of the Labor and Employment Department. With over 30 years of experience as both a trial lawyer and legal advisor for employers in Texas and across the country, she has handled every adversarial and operational matter that can arise in the employer-employee relationship.

Read more about Ruth Ann DanielsEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial
  • Blog:
    M&A Insights
  • Organization:
    Gray Reed & McGraw LLP

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo