Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Work From Home – SOS! Post-Pandemic Legal Hazards

By Montaye Sigmon, Mishell Parreno Taylor & Akerman Law on April 27, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The pandemic has revolutionized the workplaces and remote workforces will almost certainly survive the end of the pandemic. A Gallup poll last fall indicated that 61 percent of workers expect to work remotely at least part of the time in the future, and just 9 percent expect to work from home only minimally or not at all. With that in mind, employers and HR professionals must consider how to properly navigate the legal hazards stemming from our new normal. The following provides some key considerations in successfully managing a remote workforce.

Tax Issues

Remote workers can create a host of potential tax issues for employers. When an employee works outside the state or city where the employer has its normal business operations, the physical presence and activities of remote workers in another location may result in the employer becoming subject to:

  • State income tax withholding and remittance requirements with respect to wages paid to employees for work performed while they were physically present in that state;
  • State unemployment taxes;
  • Sales and use taxes;
  • Gross receipts, business privilege, business income, and/or franchise taxes; and/or
  • State or local business licensing or registration requirements (which may or may not be tax-related).

Each taxing jurisdiction establishes its own rules about what activity triggers a particular type of tax, and the rules vary significantly between jurisdictions. Potential application of tax requirements must be evaluated in light of the specific facts and circumstances of each employer and its workforce. During the pandemic, some states issued guidance that workers who were temporarily telecommuting due to the pandemic did not create nexus with the state for certain tax purposes; however, most of that guidance has expired and many employees are seeking to permanently perform some or all of their work on a remote basis.

Fundamentally, the critical first step for any employer is knowing where its workers are when performing their job duties. In this regard, some employers have elected to use software that tracks the physical location of an employer-provided device (usually a laptop) or allows the employee to set their physical location upon logging in each day. Once an employer knows the location(s) of its remote employees, it can then evaluate each jurisdiction’s tax laws to determine whether, as a result of its employees’ activities, the employer is subject to additional tax requirements.

Consistent Application of Remote or Telework Policies

Employers should ensure work-from-home policies are applied equitably and consistently. Arbitrary decisions can lead to claims of unfair treatment and impact successful talent management. Implementing a robust remote work or telework policy and procedure is the first step to ensuring that those who are in charge of administering telework policies do so in a consistent manner. The guidelines should have objective, business-related criteria and those administering the remote or telework policies should be trained on consistent application of these evolving workforce rules. Ad hoc decisions and application of remote or telework policies can lead to discrepancies which can create the appearance of inequitable treatment.

Employers should also make sure that Equal Employment Opportunity laws are properly considered when evaluating an employee’s request to work remotely. For example, such request could be based on a medical condition that would trigger obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, Family and Medical Leave Act and similar state laws.

Wage and Hour Considerations – Off-the-Clock Work

Under federal law, non-exempt employees must be paid for all time spent working, even for work that was not requested but was “suffered or permitted.” According to the United States Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division, “constructive” knowledge of unscheduled hours worked is sufficient to impose liability. Courts consider whether employers “should have acquired knowledge of such hours worked through reasonable diligence.”

Employers are thus well advised to establish reporting procedures for non-scheduled time worked. These policies should be both well publicized and thoroughly explained to remote employees and those supervising remote employees. But policies alone are insufficient to prevent liability for unscheduled hours worked. The employer could be liable for wages regardless of policies where the employer “either prevents or discourages an employee from accurately reporting the time he or she has worked.” This standard may vary and be even more burdensome in certain states, so proper hours worked management is critical to mitigate risk.

Unreimbursed Expenses

Hefty penalties and class and representative actions loom for employers who fail to reimburse for business expenses, and what is legally reimbursable becomes more blurry with a remote workforce. Federal law requires employers to reimburse employees for business expenses when the expenses reduce the employee’s wages to below the required minimum wage or overtime rate. Certain states (including California and Illinois) go further, requiring employers to reimburse for all reasonable and necessary expenditures or losses. Employers should ensure remote employees are compensated for or provided with any supplies needed and allow employees to seek reimbursement for supplies purchased. “Necessary” supplies will often include payment of some proportion of internet and cell phone costs. Recent class actions seeking work-from-home business-related reimbursements remind employers to stay vigilant in enforcing reimbursement policies.

Home-Based Working Conditions

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will not hold employers liable for employees’ home offices and does not require employers to inspect the home offices of their employees. However, OSHA has stated it will conduct inspections of other “home-based worksites” such as home manufacturing operations when a complaint is received. Additionally, employers may have workers’ compensation obligations should an employee injure him or herself while carrying out his or her job duties in a remote setting.

Conclusion

The evolving workplace landscape presents new legal risks for employers, but exposure can be mitigated with carefully considered policies and procedures. For assistance with these issues, contact your Akerman attorney.

Photo of Montaye Sigmon Montaye Sigmon

Montaye Sigmon advises clients regarding compliance with a variety of employee benefits-related laws and regulations including ERISA, COBRA, and the Affordable Care Act, and privacy and data security laws including the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act.

Montaye Sigmon advises clients regarding compliance with a variety of employee benefits-related laws and regulations including ERISA, COBRA, and the Affordable Care Act, and privacy and data security laws including the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act. Montaye also counsels corporate clients regarding state and local tax matters, including sales and use taxes, franchise and income taxes, and excise taxes.

Read more about Montaye SigmonEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Mishell Parreno Taylor Mishell Parreno Taylor

Mishell Parreno Taylor focuses her practice on employment litigation in federal and state courts and administrative agencies across the country. Mishell partners with stakeholders in organizations of all sizes, ranging from local to global corporations on a broad spectrum of employment law issues…

Mishell Parreno Taylor focuses her practice on employment litigation in federal and state courts and administrative agencies across the country. Mishell partners with stakeholders in organizations of all sizes, ranging from local to global corporations on a broad spectrum of employment law issues, including defending clients against individual and class-wide claims of discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, and retaliation. Additionally, she handles both individual and class action/California Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) wage and hour litigation in matters involving claims of missed meal and rest periods, unlawful deductions, misclassification, expense reimbursement, and off-the-clock work.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    HR Defense
  • Organization:
    Akerman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo