Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

California Privacy Regulator to Hold Stakeholder Sessions First Week of May

pexels-lewis-mcneal-1666383
By Kyle Fath on May 2, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As part of its continued preliminary rulemaking activities, the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) will be holding stakeholder sessions Wednesday, May 4 through Friday, May 6 to provide an opportunity for stakeholders to weigh in on topics relevant to upcoming rulemaking. The Agenda for each of the sessions, which are slated to last an entire day, is available here.

The Agenda lists various topics on which the CPPA will allow stakeholders to provide input, including automated decision-making, data minimization and purpose limitations, dark patterns, consumers’ rights, cybersecurity audits and risk assessments, and audits performed by the Agency. In addition to defined topics, there are also time slots available for general public comments for individuals or entities who did not have an opportunity to register in advance to make comments. If the length of time devoted is an indication of the Agency’s focus on a particular topic, it is worth noting that the time allotted for automated decision making (three hours) and consumer rights (six hours) – with two and a half hours devoted to opt-out rights, two and a half hours devoted to rights to delete, correct, and know, and one hour devoted to the sensitive PI opt-out – is significantly greater than other topics.

As we reported previously, the CPPA reported that it will miss its July 1, 2022 deadline for final CPRA regulations. In fact, we will be lucky to have regulations by the time the CPRA becomes fully operative on January 1, 2023.  In its most optimistic estimate, the CPPA is shooting for the middle of the fourth quarter of this year for final regulations.

Please contact the author or your relationship attorney at Squire Patton Boggs if you have questions about privacy rulemaking in California or Colorado, which is also actively engaged in pre-rulemaking activities, as we discussed here. We are working with clients, trade organizations, and bar associations to help them participate in the preliminary and formal rulemaking processes in these states.

Photo of Kyle Fath Kyle Fath
Read more about Kyle FathEmail
  • Posted in:
    Privacy & Data Security
  • Blog:
    Consumer Privacy World
  • Organization:
    Squire Patton Boggs
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • The FTI Award Journal
  • International Dispute Resolution
  • China Law Update Blog
  • Law of The Ledger
  • Antitrust Law Blog
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo