Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Suspension & Debarment Annual Report: Key Takeaways

By Aron C. Beezley & Nathaniel J. Greeson on May 31, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Table of Contents

  • What is the ISDC Suspension and Debarment Report?
  • What are the key takeaways from this year’s report?
  • Wait, I have more questions!

The Interagency Suspension and Debarment Committee (ISDC) recently issued its annual report to Congress on federal government suspension and debarment activities for fiscal year (FY) 2020. Key takeaways from the year’s ISDC report are discussed below.

Link to What is the ISDC Suspension and Debarment Report? What is the ISDC Suspension and Debarment Report?

Created by Executive Order 12549, the ISDC is an interagency body “consisting of Federal agencies that pool resources, experience, and promising practices to provide support for suspension and debarment programs throughout the Federal Government.” Section 873 of Public Law 110-417 requires the ISDC to submit an annual report to Congress on, among other things, “the progress and efforts to improve the suspension and debarment system” and “a summary of each agency’s activities and accomplishments in the Government debarment system.”

Link to What are the key takeaways from this year’s report? What are the key takeaways from this year’s report?

As the following chart from the ISDC report shows, agencies reported issuing 415 suspensions, 1,317 proposed debarments, and 1,256 debarments government-wide in FY 2020, “notwithstanding the COVID-19 pandemic and dispersed, remote, or socially distanced workforce.”

By comparison, federal agencies initiated a total of 3,358 suspension and debarment-related actions in FY 2019 (722 suspensions, 1,437 proposed debarments, and 1,199 debarments).

In FY 2020, federal agencies also reported a total receipt of 2,446 referrals and the issuance of 183 declinations government-wide. Agencies also reported an approximately 20% increase of total post-notice engagements with respondents from FY 2019.

Finally, the report notes that for FY 2020 federal agencies reported entering into 58 administrative agreements, which are used as an alternative to suspension and debarment and typically mandate the implementation of measures to improve the ethical culture and corporate governance of a respondence. By comparison, for FY 2019 federal agencies reported entering into 54 administrative agreements.

Link to Wait, I have more questions! Wait, I have more questions!

If you have any questions about this year’s ISDC report, or about suspension and debarment-related actions in general, please do not hesitate to contact Aron Beezley or Nathaniel Greeson*.

*During his service in the federal government, Nathaniel Greeson managed the Suspension and Debarment program at the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Photo of Aron C. Beezley Aron C. Beezley

Aron Beezley is the co-leader of Bradley’s nationally ranked Government Contracts Practice Group. Ranked nationally himself in Government Contracts Law by Chambers, Law360, Benchmark Litigation, and Super Lawyers, Aron’s vast experience includes representation of government contractors in numerous industries…

Aron Beezley is the co-leader of Bradley’s nationally ranked Government Contracts Practice Group. Ranked nationally himself in Government Contracts Law by Chambers, Law360, Benchmark Litigation, and Super Lawyers, Aron’s vast experience includes representation of government contractors in numerous industries and in all aspects of the government-contracting process, including negotiation, award, performance and termination.

Read more about Aron C. BeezleyEmailAron's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Nathaniel J. Greeson Nathaniel J. Greeson

Nathaniel Greeson helps clients solve government contracts challenges. Nathaniel represents clients in a range of government procurement issues, including bid protests, claims, disputes, audits and investigations. He has extensive experience with GAO bid protests, agency-level protests, Court of Federal Claims (COFC) bid protests…

Nathaniel Greeson helps clients solve government contracts challenges. Nathaniel represents clients in a range of government procurement issues, including bid protests, claims, disputes, audits and investigations. He has extensive experience with GAO bid protests, agency-level protests, Court of Federal Claims (COFC) bid protests, and SBA OHA size and NAICS appeals, as well as experience with agency-level requests for equitable adjustments (REA) and claims, and Boards of Contract Appeals claims. View articles by Nathaniel.

Read more about Nathaniel J. GreesonEmailNathaniel's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government Contracts
  • Blog:
    BuildSmart
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo