Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

How the New 2022 SAG-AFTRA Commercials Contract Affects Performers and Advertisers

By Howard Weingrad of Davis+Gilbert LLP, Samantha G. Rothaus of Davis+Gilbert LLP & Jordan Thompson of Davis+Gilbert LLP on July 14, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

A new collective bargaining agreement governing the use of SAG-AFTRA (the Union) performers in commercials has been reached between the Union and the Joint Policy Committee (JPC).

The new 2022 SAG-AFTRA Commercials Contract (the 2022 Contract), which is retroactively effective to April 1, 2022, appears to offer certain benefits to advertiser and agency signatories of the Commercials Contract, particularly JPC authorizers, as well as Union member performers.

The 4.88% increase to use fees is the lowest rate hike in more than a decade. The 2022 Contract’s advertiser-friendly editing rules and its simplified approach to categorizing digital media outlets are clearly meant to alleviate advertiser and agency frustrations and make the contract more functional and user-friendly. Additionally, with new protections for talent in the wake of the #MeToo movement and new requirements designed to improve opportunities for performers of color, the Union achieved notable wins for talent.

Read on to learn more about notable changes and how they will affect advertiser and agency signatories and the Union’s member performers.

Despite Rate Increases, Advertisers May See Savings — and Simplicity 

The pricing structures set forth in the Commercials Contract under prior agreements have been a source of confusion for both signatories and talent. With use payments depending largely on distribution channels, duration of use and the number of edits, union talent and advertiser/agency signatories often found it difficult to predict the total amount that talent was entitled to with certainty.

The following updates in the 2022 Contract attempt to simplify and clarify longstanding pain points with respect to minimum payments due under the agreement:

  • Performer wages-and-use rates increase by 4.88% — the lowest increase in over a decade.
  • Pension and health contributions increased to 20.5% (from 19%). For JPC authorizers, the increase is lower: only 19.25% (from 18.5%) — the lowest increase for JPC authorizers in over a decade (further incentivizing advertisers and agencies to become JPC authorizers versus signing onto the 2022 Contract directly or engaging talent through a third party signatory).
  • Payment of pension and health contributions is now clearly due 30 days following the date that the applicable performer’s compensation is required to be paid. This clarification will help minimize confusion over payment deadlines that have historically resulted in disputes over late payment.
  • The new compensation structure simplifies session and use fees for linear, linear and digital, and digital-only usage, and includes an annual cap on the amount a performer is entitled to for a Class A commercial.
  • The new editing structure gives advertisers more freedom to edit a commercial without having to treat each edited version as a new commercial. Under the 2022 Contract, advertisers have an automatic right to create an unlimited number of shorter or longer versions of a commercial.
  • The 2022 Contract also gives advertisers the right to make unlimited edits to a commercial if those edits change a depicted product to another variation of the same product (such as another color or size, or another item in the same product line). They may also make unlimited edits to a commercial if those edits change the background setting via computer-generated imagery (CGI) or green screen (such as changing a beach scene to a mountain scene). Advertisers even have the option to reshoot the same commercial with different props and with the same performers in different wardrobes to align with an edited background change (such as changing bathing suits and surfboards to ski pants and snowboards).
  • The new structure also allows for an unlimited number of similar edits to addressable commercials, which are specifically produced in multiple variations to be inserted at the individual household level. The new editing structure applies to commercials made for both linear and digital media, again, without treating each edit as a separate commercial and without needing to negotiate with the performers. Notably, the Alternate Compensation Structure (ACS), which was introduced in 2019 in an effort to simplify costs, was discontinued as of June 1, 2022.
  • After June 1, until the end of the year, advertisers may elect to produce commercials using the traditional, non-ACS, compensation model, or switch to the new 2022 Contract model.
  • Those continuing to use the traditional compensation model will be subject to additional increases to talent session-and-use fees with no cap on talent fees for Class A commercials. Also, they will not be able to take advantage of the new editing structure. As a result, advertisers may have a financial incentive to transition to the new 2022 Contract model more quickly.
  • As of January 1, 2023, only the 2022 Contract compensation structure will be available.

How these changes will affect advertisers and agencies across the industry, however, remains to be seen. While the benefits of unlimited editing rights will provide some advertisers with more freedom to create a greater number of materials at a lower cost, the increases to the talent session-and-use fees may counteract some of these cost savings. Depending on the specifics of each advertiser’s media plan, some may find the 2022 Contract to be financially beneficial, while others may find it to be even more costly.

New Clarity for Digital Media and Streaming

A major goal of the Union and JPC in negotiating the 2022 Contract was to have an agreement that takes into account trends in the industry and better reflects the media landscape of today. Before the 2022 Contract was ratified, the previous Commercials Contract characterized website-driven distribution channels within a category known as “Internet,” while app-driven channels and other new methods of distributing and accessing online media were separately categorized as “New Media.” However, platforms such as Instagram and other social media sites, which have both a website and mobile app, quickly presented challenges and caused confusion about which usage fees applied to social media commercials.

The same was true with the rise in prominence of over-the-top streaming services like Hulu (and all the +’s … Disney, Apple, Paramount, Discovery). Increasingly, advertisers and agencies were left to wonder whether use of a commercial on a platform like Hulu was categorized as Television, Internet or New Media. Advertisers and agencies quickly grew frustrated with the existing language in the Commercials Contract, which did not take into account the mechanics of these emerging digital technologies and often resulted in advertisers being forced to pay double the fees when using a commercial on a social media or streaming platform to ensure that the usage was covered for both Internet and New Media.

The 2022 Contract attempts to address these frustrations by introducing new categories that better define current distribution platforms and leave room for the emergence of new platforms down the road. The 2022 Contract eliminates the “Internet” and “New Media” categories and replaces them with the following:

  • All Digital relating to:
    • Traditional Digital (e.g., social media, YouTube, brand websites, retailer websites, etc.); and
    • Gaming Platforms/Virtual Worlds/Augmented Reality/Emerging Platforms
  • Streaming Platforms (e.g., Amazon Prime, Hulu, Netflix, Disney+, AppleTV+, Peacock, Paramount Plus, YouTubeTV, etc.).

These new categories should make it easier for advertisers and agencies to determine the appropriate amount of use fees owed to talent and which union obligations are applicable to a given digital content production.

The 2022 Contract also protects talent’s rights in newly developing digital platforms, including augmented reality, virtual reality and the metaverse. As improvements in CGI and artificial intelligence make it easier to utilize and replicate performers’ likenesses, voices and other identifying attributes, the Union now expressly prohibits using computer-generated images or voices of performers to create “digital doubles” to evade the obligations of the 2022 Commercials Contract.

Waivers Here to Stay … for Now 

In recent years, the rise in digital media led advertisers to produce low-budget content at higher volume, with greater frequency, across a variety of channels. However, under prior Commercials Contracts, signatories faced challenges because usage restrictions, minimum payment obligations and other requirements imposed by the Union impeded their ability to compete with non-signatories, who were able to produce digital advertising more quickly and at lower talent cost. To help level the playing field, the Union began introducing various waivers of certain requirements, offering signatories greater flexibility in producing advertising content covered by the Commercials Contract, while taking into account their practical need to meaningfully compete for advertising business. Such waivers include, for example, the Low Budget Digital Waiver, the Temporary Stock Footage Waiver, the Social Media Waiver and, most recently, the Influencer Produced Sponsored Content Waiver.

While the 2022 Contract doesn’t introduce any new exceptions that are intended to aide in leveling out the playing field between signatories and non-signatures in the same manner and to the same extent as the waivers, the agreement does include a new provision relating to the use of stock footage and still photographs in commercials stemming from a prior waiver that signatories are likely to find beneficial. The Temporary Stock Footage Waiver, introduced at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, sought to resolve a long-standing conflict between the Union and the JPC regarding whether and when pre-existing stock footage and still photographs used in commercials would trigger the need to make session-and-use payments to the individuals depicted in those stock materials.

The 2022 Contract clarifies that Union obligations do not apply to persons depicted in pre-existing photographs that were not made by or on behalf of the advertiser and that are licensed for use in a commercial. This change provides greater clarity to advertisers and agencies seeking to utilize stock photography in commercials. The Union and JPC have confirmed that, in those instances where ambiguity remains, the Temporary Stock Footage Waiver continues to remain in effect. In addition, the Low Budget Digital Waiver, Social Media and YouTube Waiver, and Influencer Produced Sponsored Content Waiver also remain in effect without any modifications. The Low Budget Digital Waiver will expire on December 31, 2022. However, the Union and JPC will meet prior to its expiration to decide whether or not the waiver should be renewed.

Reflecting New Social Priorities

The Union and the JPC also agreed upon several changes that reflect the industry’s growing focus on diversity, equity and inclusion in the wake of social movements like #MeToo and “#OscarsSoWhite.” To help protect performers from sexual harassment and abuse, the 2022 Contract implements new requirements for auditions and on-set working conditions involving nudity or intimate acts. For example, the 2022 contract prohibits auditions from taking place in hotel rooms where performers are alone with representatives of the production.

The 2022 Contract also prioritizes diverse performers by requiring producers to utilize only “qualified” hairstylists and makeup artists, defined to mean “hair stylists with proven ability and experience styling a variety of textures and styles” including locks, twists, fades and tight curls, and “makeup artists who are experienced in working with diverse skin pigments and features.” These changes are an important win for the Union and its performers and are an important step forward in creating new norms in the advertising industry to support women and performers of color.

The Bottom Line

  • The 2022 Commercials Contract increases session, usage, and pension & health fees, but by the lowest incremental amount in over a decade. Fee caps, a simplified compensation structure, and unlimited editing rights balance out these increases by offering savings in other areas while making use fees more predictable over time.
  • The new agreement simplifies the previous categorization of digital media channels and accounts for ongoing changes in emerging platforms.
  • The new agreement also reflects an increased awareness and prioritization of opportunities for diverse performers and protections for performers as a whole.
Photo of Howard Weingrad of Davis+Gilbert LLP Howard Weingrad of Davis+Gilbert LLP

Howie Weingrad is the advertising lawyer clients trust to help them navigate the complex problems and potential risk arising from all aspects of their proposed campaigns. From initial concept through production and launch, Howie advises on content review and production, celebrity endorsement and…

Howie Weingrad is the advertising lawyer clients trust to help them navigate the complex problems and potential risk arising from all aspects of their proposed campaigns. From initial concept through production and launch, Howie advises on content review and production, celebrity endorsement and talent engagement, and pre-litigation IP and contract dispute resolution. He negotiates and structures agreements with commercial production companies and advises on social media advertising.

Howie tackles difficult, time-sensitive challenges with good judgment and confidence. Often involved in the initial concept creation, Howie partners with his many long-term clients to understand their goals, assess risk and remove obstacles, creating a path for brands and agencies to transform ideas into award-winning global advertising campaigns. In addition to advising on advertising questions, he brings extensive knowledge of intellectual property issues, including copyright, trademark, rights of privacy/publicity and unfair competition.

As one of the country’s leading practitioners in matters involving the provisions and industry implications of the SAG-AFTRA Commercials Contract, Howie often negotiates with unions and guilds on behalf of agency and advertiser clients. He interprets and explains complex advertising and entertainment industry collective bargaining agreement provisions for his clients to apply to their day-to-day workforce challenges.

Howie is equally equipped to help brands and agencies with a wide variety of celebrity endorsement and music-related issues that arise in their marketing campaigns, social media challenges, live streams and artist collaborations. A jazz pianist with a degree in music composition, he works directly with musicologists to identify potential problems and helps clients address their indemnity issues.

When IP litigation or contract disputes arise, Howie stays involved to resolve matters quickly. He understands the issues driving a copyright infringement or business dispute. He uses his litigation background and deep IP experience to devise pre-litigation strategies or support litigation teams in order to drive a successful outcome.

Read more about Howard Weingrad of Davis+Gilbert LLPEmailHoward's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Samantha G. Rothaus of Davis+Gilbert LLP Samantha G. Rothaus of Davis+Gilbert LLP

For agencies and brands exploring innovative ways to promote their content and products, Samantha Rothaus provides counsel by balancing legal risk with business objectives. Drawing on prior intellectual property litigation experience, she helps clients launch collaborative projects, understand their contract rights, and negotiate…

For agencies and brands exploring innovative ways to promote their content and products, Samantha Rothaus provides counsel by balancing legal risk with business objectives. Drawing on prior intellectual property litigation experience, she helps clients launch collaborative projects, understand their contract rights, and negotiate talent and production agreements.

Often involved at the earliest stages of a client’s project, Samantha uses a highly attentive and practical approach to avoid problems and craft solutions. Her thoughtful and individualized guidance supports creative agencies and brands launching traditional advertising activities in addition to custom-branded content produced by media partners. Whether companies are seeking collaborative opportunities through co-branded promotional campaigns or sponsored events, or are engaging influencers, celebrity spokespeople or content production vendors, Samantha’s best practices and productive negotiation strategies help achieve their goals and preserve their best interests. She also assists clients in identifying and understanding SAG-AFTRA union obligations.

With her background in intellectual property litigation, Samantha recognizes the value companies place on protecting their intellectual property rights. She evaluates potential benefits and consequences of sharing or promoting content so clients can make sound business decisions. When agencies seek to expand their scope of use, they benefit from her contract analyses to understand their legal rights, obligations and required permissions.

Prior to joining Davis+Gilbert, Samantha’s practice focused on copyright and trademark litigation, brand protection, and trademark prosecution for entertainment companies, fashion retailers and consumer brands.

Read more about Samantha G. Rothaus of Davis+Gilbert LLPEmailSamantha's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Jordan Thompson of Davis+Gilbert LLP Jordan Thompson of Davis+Gilbert LLP

Jordan Thompson counsels creative agencies and production companies in advertising, intellectual property (IP) and branded content-related matters. She plays a key role in the development, production and distribution of original content and the use of third-party IP.

While working with agencies that represent…

Jordan Thompson counsels creative agencies and production companies in advertising, intellectual property (IP) and branded content-related matters. She plays a key role in the development, production and distribution of original content and the use of third-party IP.

While working with agencies that represent major consumer retail brands across various industries, including food, furniture, automotive, financial services and consumer electronics, Jordan aligns herself with each client’s business goals. Engaged and inquisitive, she understands the commercial significance of each matter and provides thoughtful guidance to achieve short- and long-term goals.

In addition to drafting and reviewing campaign-related documents and creative concepts, Jordan assists clients in ensuring their product claims comply with truth-in-advertising laws. She supports creative promotional strategies, including the use of contests and sweepstakes in accordance with state regulations. Jordan also helps negotiate licenses for music and other third-party IP use in commercials.

Before she joined Davis+Gilbert, Jordan worked as an in-house attorney at JPMorgan Chase, where she gained valuable experience handling trademark, copyright and rights of publicity matters in the IP and marketing/sports/entertainment departments. That experience helped shape her understanding of client needs and her solutions-driven approach to addressing legal and practical considerations.

Read more about Jordan Thompson of Davis+Gilbert LLPEmailJordan's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    ILN IP Insider
  • Organization:
    International Lawyers Network
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo