Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

U.S. House Increases FinCEN’s Funding by Over 30%

By Izabella Babchinetskaya on July 28, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Earlier this year, U.S. President Joe Biden requested an increase in spending for the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) to $210 million.  Last week, the U.S. House of Representatives (the “House”) passed a bill fulfilling that request, increasing FinCEN’s budget by over 30% to $210,330,000.  This is the exact figure requested by FinCEN, which also seeks to supplement its budget by another $12.57 million from other sources.  On Tuesday, the bill was referred to the Committee on Appropriations in the U.S. Senate, which still needs to weigh in on FinCEN’s final budget.

FinCEN’s budget has been an important and ongoing issue.  Citing budgetary constraints, FinCEN has struggled to implement the huge array of tasks and deadlines imposed upon it by Congress through the Anti-Money Laundering Act (“AMLA”) and Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”).  These tasks include approximately 40 rulemaking or other requirements, including periodic Congressional reporting on implementation efforts, assessments, and findings, including, but not limited to:

  1. Establishing a national database regarding beneficial owners of companies;
  2. Establishing priorities regarding national anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism;
  3. Enhancing the whistleblower provisions; and
  4. Finalizing any rulemaking regarding the real estate industry.

FinCEN advocated for an increase in its budget, which would allow it to add oversight of the financial sector, strengthen corporate accountability, provide adequate support to law enforcement and investigative entities, and modernize the sanctions process.  Further, FinCEN could increase its staff to about 420 employees to meet the needs of the AMLA and CTA. 

The increased funding comes on the heels of this month’s amendment in the U.S. Congress to the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”), which we previously blogged about here.  With an amendment that is arguably more sweeping than the AMLA, and the outstanding requirements under the AMLA and CTA, FinCEN needs the additional resources to be able to meet the needs and requirements of the recent legislation.

If you would like to remain updated on these issues, please click here to subscribe to Money Laundering Watch. Please click here to find out about Ballard Spahr’s Anti-Money Laundering Team.

Izabella Babchinetskaya

Babchinetskayai@ballardspahr.com | 215.864.8315 | view full bio

Izabella represents clients, including financial institutions, in complex civil litigation, including cases involving allegations of fraud and claims turning on alleged violations of the BSA. Prior to joining Ballard Spahr, Izabella volunteered with the Environmental Crimes…

Babchinetskayai@ballardspahr.com | 215.864.8315 | view full bio

Izabella represents clients, including financial institutions, in complex civil litigation, including cases involving allegations of fraud and claims turning on alleged violations of the BSA. Prior to joining Ballard Spahr, Izabella volunteered with the Environmental Crimes Section of the Department of Justice and interned with the Honorable Joel H. Slomsky of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Read more about Izabella BabchinetskayaEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Money Laundering Watch
  • Organization:
    Ballard Spahr LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo