Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Michigan Coverage Dispute Highlights Steep Cost of Statutory Penalty Interest

By Jeffrey Ward & Christopher Sakauye on August 8, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Statutory penalty interest can be a significant exposure for insurers in some jurisdictions. A court’s recent ruling in Alticor Global Holdings Inc., et al. v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co., et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-388, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130101 (W.D. Mich. June 8, 2022), illustrates the potentially steep cost.

In Alticor, the insured sought coverage for the defense and settlement of claims alleging copyright infringement and breach of contract. The court entered orders finding that the insurer had incorrectly denied coverage for the claims and holding that the insured was entitled to reimbursement of more than $24 million for its defense costs and settlement payments. The court also entered an order imposing penalty interest under Michigan Compiled Laws § 500.2006, which can require payment of 12 percent penalty interest to the insured if benefits are not paid on a timely basis. The penalty interest for the five-year coverage dispute in Alticor added approximately $10.5 million to the judgment against the insurer.

Michigan is not the only state with a penalty interest statute. See also Tennessee Code Ann. § 56-7-105(a) (imposing “sum not exceeding twenty-five percent (25%) on the liability for the loss” where insurer refuses in bad faith to pay a claim within 60 days after demand has been made); Texas Ins. Code § 542.060(a) (imposing “interest on the amount of the claim at the rate of 18 percent a year as damages, together with reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees” on insurer who does not accept or reject claim within 15 business days of receipt of documents that show final proof of loss); Louisiana Rev. Stat. Ann. § 22:1892(B)(1)(a) (imposing “fifty percent damages on the amount found to be due from the insurer to the insured, or one thousand dollars, whichever is greater” where insurer fails to make a payment under a claim within 30 days of receiving satisfactory proof of loss “when such failure is found to be arbitrary, capricious, or without probable cause…”). Important details regarding penalty interest statutes vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For example, some statutes impose penalty interest only if the insurer failed to pay a claim in bad faith, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-105(a), whereas others do not, see Tex. Ins. Code § 542.060(a).

Statutory penalty interest can be a multi-million dollar issue in some coverage actions, so it is important to consider at the outset of any case whether it might apply.

Photo of Jeffrey Ward Jeffrey Ward

Jeff Ward’s practice focuses on counseling and litigation related to D&O and professional liability insurance. With more than two decades as outside coverage counsel, he helps clients resolve claims involving attorneys, accountants, investment advisors, and executives in various industries.

Read more about Jeffrey WardEmail
Photo of Christopher Sakauye Christopher Sakauye

Chris Sakauye represents insurers in complex coverage matters. He is adept at assessing and applying current and developing trends in case law across all 50 states. His experience on a nationally recognized trial team also gives him unique insight into the pressure points…

Chris Sakauye represents insurers in complex coverage matters. He is adept at assessing and applying current and developing trends in case law across all 50 states. His experience on a nationally recognized trial team also gives him unique insight into the pressure points that bring difficult cases to quick and efficient resolutions.

Read more about Christopher SakauyeEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Insurance
  • Blog:
    Insurance Coverage Notes and Developments
  • Organization:
    Dykema
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • U.S. Legal Insights for Korean Businesses
  • Latin American Blog
  • Intellectual Property Law Blog
  • Insurance Law Blog
  • Global Projects View
Copyright © 2023, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo