Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FCC Adopts Rulemaking Proposal to Protect Consumer Privacy From Invasion by Unwanted Text Messages

By Paul Besozzi on September 30, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In October of 2021, then Acting Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel circulated a proposal among her Commissioner colleagues to address the problem of illegal robotexts invading consumer privacy. At the time, she noted that the FCC has seen “a rise in scammers trying to take advantage of our trust of text messages by sending bogus robotexts that try to trick consumers to share sensitive information or click on malicious links. It’s time we take steps to confront this latest wave of fraud and identify how mobile carriers can block these automated messages before they have the opportunity to cause any harm.” 

In July of this year, the FCC’s Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau issued a “Consumer Alert,” warning of the rising threat of bogus texting. The Alert provided “Consumer Tips” to identify and avoid being bothered by possible scam messages.

Now, roughly a year after originally proposed, the agency has approved a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would set new rules to “fight back against malicious robotext campaigns.” 

The NPRM asks for public comment on a proposal that, among other things, would require “mobile wireless providers to block texts, at the network level, that purport to be from invalid, unallocated, or unused numbers, and numbers on a Do-Not-Originate (DNO) list.” The FCC also seeks suggestions on “other actions the Commission might take to address illegal texts, including enhanced consumer education.” To facilitate the proposed blocking for certain types of texts, the NPRM asks whether the rules should “require providers to implement caller ID authentication for text messages.”

The FCC received 15,300 consumer complaints about unwanted texts in 2021 and 8,500 such complaints through June 30, 2022. This NPRM labels the numbers, although lower than complaints about unwanted calls, as evidence of an “emerging problem,” noting “unwanted text messages invade consumer privacy, and are vehicles for consumer fraud and identity theft.”

The agency has set a 45-day comment period on the proposal, to start 30 days after publication of summary in the Federal Register.

Photo of Paul Besozzi Paul Besozzi

I have practiced in the telecommunications regulatory field, including before the FCC and state regulatory agencies, for some 35 years. This has included advising clients on all manner of compliance, rulemaking, enforcement and legislative issues relating to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and…

I have practiced in the telecommunications regulatory field, including before the FCC and state regulatory agencies, for some 35 years. This has included advising clients on all manner of compliance, rulemaking, enforcement and legislative issues relating to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Junk Fax Act, particularly before the FCC which develops the regulations implementing those statutes. My efforts include reviewing clients’ technology and TCPA compliance plans to determine whether they meet FCC requirements and advising on strategies for raising issues with the FCC.

Read more about Paul BesozziEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Privacy World
  • Organization:
    Squire Patton Boggs
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo