Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Maryland court says insurer’s non-premium receipts exempt from income tax

By Scott Wright & Eversheds Sutherland SALT on October 20, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals affirmed the tax court’s decision that a Macy’s captive insurance company is exempt from Maryland corporate income taxes on interest payments received from a Macy’s affiliate. Maryland imposes a premium receipts tax on unauthorized insurance companies, which includes the taxpayer captive insurer in this case. The taxpayer captive insurer paid no premium receipts tax to Maryland for the years at issue. However, the Maryland law says: “the premium receipts tax under this section is instead of all other State taxes.” The Court of Specials Appeals found this language to be unambiguous—a company subject to the premium receipts tax is exempt from all other taxes, without other conditions. The court noted that while exempting taxpayers who do not pay any premium receipts tax from other taxes may not have been the legislative intent, the court said it was bound by the plain language of the statute.

Comptroller of the Treasury v. Leadville Ins. Co., No. 563, 2022 Md. App. LEXIS 64 (unpublished Ct. of Special App. Aug. 29, 2022).

Photo of Scott Wright Scott Wright
Read more about Scott WrightEmail
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    SALT Shaker
  • Organization:
    Eversheds Sutherland LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo