Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

DOJ Secures First Win in Criminal No Poach Action

By Leslie E. John, James A. Mitchell & Karli Lubin on October 29, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On October 27, 2022, VDA OC, LLC, (VDA) a Nevada health care staffing company, pleaded guilty to participating in a conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition for the services of school nurses.  According to the plea, VDA and an unnamed competitor agreed not to recruit or hire each other’s nurses and to refrain from raising wages of the nurses. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada sentenced VDA to pay $134,000, consisting of a $62,000 criminal fine and $72,000 in restitution to nurses impacted by the agreement.  The criminal fine represents a percentage of VDA’s volume of commerce during the approximately 9 months the agreement was in place.  Federal sentencing guidelines provide for a base fine of 20 percent of affected commerce that can be adjusted based on a number of sentencing factors and can be substantial.

This is the DOJ’s first successful criminal prosecution in a labor-focused antitrust case. In 2016, in a joint statement with the Federal Trade Commission, the DOJ announced its intent to criminally prosecute agreements between employers not to poach each other’s employees (no-poach agreements) or fix wages as per se violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Prior to that announcement, such agreements were the subject of civil enforcement actions, if at all, which carry no risk of prison time for individuals. As we previously reported here, the DOJ’s first two criminal no-poach trials ended in acquittals of any antitrust crimes for the indicted companies and individuals.

Despite those acquittals, the DOJ has appeared undeterred in investigating no-poach and wage fixing agreements, and the result in this case may well further embolden its criminal enforcement in the labor space. Ballard Spahr’s Antitrust and Labor and Employment Groups are prepared to answer questions regarding antitrust issues in the context of the labor market. Please contact us if we can assist you in understanding your company’s legal requirements and the measures your business should take to remain in compliance with applicable law.

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    HR Law Watch
  • Organization:
    Ballard Spahr LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Troutman Pepper Financial Services
  • The EX-Files
  • Construction & Infrastructure Law Blog
  • Venture Law Blog
  • Trust on Trial
Copyright © 2023, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo