Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

An Update to “Made in USA” for Federally Procured Products and FTC’s “Made in USA”

By Richard Starr & Todd A. Harrison on November 9, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Recent trends indicate that consumers and the U.S. government are paying more attention to where products are sourced from.  

The Biden administration, for example, has made efforts to raise federal procurement standards for products “Made in America.” Specifically, the administration in March announced a final rule that outlined gradual increases to the “Made in America” requirement. As of October 25, the rule requires that federally procured products under the Buy American Act must have 60% of the value of their component parts manufactured in the United States. Under the prior rules, the Buy American Act only required that products contain 55% component parts manufactured in America in order to qualify for federal procurement. The threshold will further increase to 65% in 2024 and 75% in 2029.

As an initial signal of the importance of this rule to the administration, during his first week of his presidency, President Biden signed Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America’s Workers, which established a Made in America Office in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that is dedicated solely to investing in American workers, manufacturers, and goods. The office will now be in charge of implementing the federal procurement requirements.

Importantly, this final rule regarding “Made in America” claims for federally procured products is separate and distinct from FTC’s “Made in USA” Labeling Rule that took effect on August 13, 2021. Although these two actions sound incredibly similar, they serve different purposes. Under FTC’s “Made in USA” Labeling Rule, a product using a U.S. origin claim is prohibited unless 1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the products are made and sourced in the United States.

The FTC also now has the authorization and enforcement power to seek civil penalties of up to $46,517 per violation of this rule. For more information about FTC’s recent enforcement, please check out this blog post written by Venable’s Advertising Law Group.

Any way you slice it, the current administration is sending clear signals that product manufacturing origin claims are a priority with respect to consumers and federal purchasing. To be sure, it is also now crucial that labeling claims remain accurate and compliant, given the dual threat of private litigation and hefty penalties from the FTC. Indeed, there have already been five actions brought by the FTC against companies that misused the “Made in USA” origin claim.

If you have any questions about the “Made in USA” federal procurement requirements or the FTC’s Made in USA Labeling Rule, please contact Venable’s Food and Drug Law Group or Venable’s Advertising Law Group for assistance.

Todd A. Harrison

Todd Harrison, co-chair of Venable’s FDA Group, guides clients through the myriad government regulations associated with food and drug labeling and marketing. Working extensively in the areas of food and dietary supplement safety, labeling, and advertising claims, Todd helps clients in the consumer…

Todd Harrison, co-chair of Venable’s FDA Group, guides clients through the myriad government regulations associated with food and drug labeling and marketing. Working extensively in the areas of food and dietary supplement safety, labeling, and advertising claims, Todd helps clients in the consumer products, drug and medical device, and dietary products industries comply with government regulations. He regularly achieves favorable results in defending clients against Federal Trade Commission (FTC) advertising complaints, enforcement actions, and prosecutions, and overcoming competitor challenges in courts and other fora.

Read more about Todd A. HarrisonEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    All About Advertising Law
  • Organization:
    Venable LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo