Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

In an Internet Minute

By Kathryn C. Cole on January 3, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
shutterstock_347717153

As the below DOMO infographic suggests, people are reliant upon the worldwide web at activity levels that are difficult to comprehend. Consider, for example, that people send 16 million text messages every minute! Or that 2.4 million snaps are sent every 60 seconds! Or, that the internet reaches approximately 5 billion people (i.e., 63% of the world’s population) of which 93% use social media. And, each year the frequency with which people turn to the web for such things increases. A quick comparison of the number of Google queries in 2013 (2M/minute) with those in 2022 (5.9M/minute) demonstrates clearly the rate of this growth.

The reality is that many people rely on the internet for all sorts of reasons – social connection, communicating, dating, peer-to-peer payments, bill payments, entertainment, employment, groceries, gaming, shopping, etc. A reliance that seemingly grew during the pandemic as people were working remotely and socially distancing. But why do we as attorneys or compliance officers care about the growth of the internet and social media? What the infographic tells us is that people are putting potential responsive information not only in emails but also in social media posts, text messages, temporary chats, and countless other internet-based platforms, which means other repositories of facts to support or challenge a party’s claims or defenses in a lawsuit. As a result, therefore, when drafting a preservation notice or document demand, for example, it should be determined early on whether social media records could be relevant to the litigation and, if so, how to preserve that data. Note that not all social media platforms are created equal, and different approaches may be necessary to secure potential evidence. For example, some social media platforms preserve all content, whereas others are designed to be only temporary custodians, as the content disappears after it is viewed.

The internet and social media has forever changed the litigation landscape, and because of our ethical obligation as attorneys to possess technological competence handling e-discovery[1], we must understand what each platform offers and how content can be preserved.

Source: SocialMediaToday.com, “What Happens on the Internet Every Minute (2022 Version) [Infographic],” Sept. 21, 2022.


[1] See, e.g., New York County Lawyers Association Professional Ethics Committee Formal Op. 749 (Feb. 21, 2017); American Bar Association Model Rule 1.1 – “Duty of Competence” at Comment 8.

Photo of Kathryn C. Cole Kathryn C. Cole

Kathryn C. Cole is a shareholder and commercial litigator who represents businesses, financial institutions, and individuals in complex disputes across federal and state courts, arbitration, mediation, and proceedings before federal agencies and regulatory bodies. Her practice spans contract claims, product liability, tort litigation…

Kathryn C. Cole is a shareholder and commercial litigator who represents businesses, financial institutions, and individuals in complex disputes across federal and state courts, arbitration, mediation, and proceedings before federal agencies and regulatory bodies. Her practice spans contract claims, product liability, tort litigation, consumer class actions, and securities class actions, serving clients ranging from major pharmaceutical companies to closely held businesses. Katy brings a combination of courtroom advocacy, appellate experience in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and deep knowledge of eDiscovery strategy that allows her to manage high-stakes litigation from preservation through trial and appeal.

Katy is a Certified E-Discovery Specialist (CEDS) and a recognized authority on electronic discovery and data retention. She guides clients through every phase of the eDiscovery process, including identification, preservation, collection, review, and production of electronically stored information. She works closely with clients to develop defensible discovery plans and retention policies, implement technology assisted review platforms, and leverage analytics to reduce costs and risk. She is a founding member of and prolific contributor to Greenberg Traurig’s eDiscovery Watch blog, where she regularly addresses emerging issues such as generative AI in litigation, text message preservation, and spoliation.

Before entering private practice, Katy clerked for the Hon. Richard C. Wesley at both the New York Court of Appeals and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. She has argued multiple appeals in the Second Circuit and the Second Department Appellate Division, and she has in-house experience through a secondment with a major technology company. Her understanding of both the courtroom and the corporate legal department gives her a practical perspective that informs her litigation strategy and client counseling.

Katy is actively involved in shaping civil practice in New York. She serves on the Office of Court Administration’s CPLR Advisory Committee and the New York State Advisory Committee on Civil Practice. She is a past president of the Eastern District of New York Chapter of the Federal Bar Association and a Fellow of The New York Bar Foundation. She has been listed in The Best Lawyers in America for Commercial Litigation and she received the Long Island Business News “Top 50 Women in Business” award in 2024.

Read more about Kathryn C. ColeEmailKaty's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    eDiscovery Watch
  • Organization:
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo