Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Questions People Should Ask (But Often Don’t) When Starting an Asset Search

By Philip Segal on March 29, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

We’ve written many times about the questionnaire we hand out to clients who want a divorce asset search. If you want one, just contact us and we’ll send it along.

Based on the many questionnaires we’ve reviewed over the years, here are some tips on what kinds of questions you the divorcing party should be asking yourself as you contemplate separation, divorce, and compiling information on what is rightfully yours:

  • What properties do you own? (The answer may surprise you.)

On two occasions this year alone, I have had clients tell me that they thought they and their husbands owned at least three properties. In one case, I had to inform the client that she had never owned a particular piece of expensive farmland. Her husband had bought it in the name of a new company she knew nothing about, and then one month later sold it to a different company (associated with his mother) for $1.

If our client’s lawyer had asked about this piece of property at a deposition and the husband had said, “No, I don’t own it,” he would not have been lying. Now we knew about it, plus a bonus piece of property: That new company had also bought a vacation home in another state. Because we had the company name, we had the vacation home too.

On a different case, we found that one of three buildings had been sold two years ago because it had belonged not to the husband and wife but to the husband’s now-defunct company. A second building was still under the husband’s control, but in the name of yet another company. In both cases, we were not sure how much of each company the husband had owned or still owned. That was work to be done in discovery.  

  • Is that previously owned business really in the past, or is it still going?

Our client’s husband once had a company doing business and holding property in his home state on the east coast. That company had not filed its annual return in years and gave the impression that it was no longer active. It turned out that upon inspection, the company was domiciled in Delaware, not the state the husband had lived in. The registration in his state was old, but when we pulled the corporate tax records out of Delaware, he was still paying $300 a year to keep the Delaware company going. Nobody does that for an inactive company.

Later we found that the Delaware company was the way the husband was being compensated for sitting on several boards of public companies. Deep in some public securities filings was the name of the Delaware company, in a footnote to the compensation the husband was getting from the company in the form of fees and stock options.

  • Is the main business really the main business?

Husbands have a way of having really bad years in business around the time they are getting divorced. One husband we investigated recently had quietly formed a brand new company with his business partner, about a year before leaving the marital home. The new business had no internet presence and no publicity attached to it. We suggested that in discovery, our client determine that revenues were not being diverted from the company she knew about to this one we had discovered. That could happen with a switch in how he got paid, or else the new company could show up as a vendor to the old company. Both are common tactics.

THE TAKEAWAY: People getting divorced often know more than anyone else about their spouses. But as much as they know, it’s dangerous to assume that they know enough to run the asset search. Confirmation bias (the idea that you know what you’re going to discover before you start looking) is part of human nature. A new set of eyes on what looks like familiar territory can be just what an asset search needs.

Photo of Philip Segal Philip Segal

Charles Griffin is headed by Philip Segal, a New York attorney with extensive experience in corporate investigations in the U.S. for AmLaw 100 law firms and Fortune 100 companies. Segal worked previously as a case manager for the James Mintz Group in New…

Charles Griffin is headed by Philip Segal, a New York attorney with extensive experience in corporate investigations in the U.S. for AmLaw 100 law firms and Fortune 100 companies. Segal worked previously as a case manager for the James Mintz Group in New York and as North American Partner and General Counsel for GPW, a British business intelligence firm. Prior to becoming an attorney, Segal was the Finance Editor of the Asian Wall Street Journal, and worked as a journalist in five countries over 19 years with a specialization in finance. In 2012, he was named by Lawline as one of the top 40 lawyers furthering legal education.  Segal has also been a guest speaker at Columbia University on investigating complex international financing structures, and taught a seminar on Asian economics as a Freeman Scholar at the University of Indiana.  He is the author of the book, The Art of Fact Investigation: Creative Thinking in the Age of Information Overload (Ignaz Press, 2016). He lectures widely on fact investigation and ethics to bar associations across the United States.

Read more about Philip SegalEmailPhilip's Linkedin ProfilePhilip's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Family
  • Blog:
    The Divorce Asset Hunter
  • Organization:
    Charles Griffin Intelligence LLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo