Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Can You Register a Copyright on a Work that Contains Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence?

By Daniel H. Bliss of Howard & Howard & Lindsay Griffiths on May 10, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Suppose you have expressed your work in a tangible form, but it contains material generated by artificial intelligence (AI). Although your copyright exists at the moment of creation, does the work contain enough human authorship on which to base a claim for copyright registration? Should you register the copyright on the work with the U.S. Copyright Office? If there is enough human authorship, the answer is YES!

In the United States, under 17 U.S.C. § 102(a), “Copyright protection subsists, in accordance with this title, in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device”. According to the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court cases, the “authorship” in the work must be a human and not a non-human.

In the 2021 Compendium of Copyright Office Practices, the U.S. Copyright Office states that “to qualify as a work of ‘authorship’ a work must be created by a human being” and that it “will not register works produced by a machine or mere mechanical process that operates randomly or automatically without any creative input or intervention from a human author.” Suppose your work for copyright registration contains both human-authored material and AI-generated material. Would you be able to register your work as a human author? The answer is a case-by-case inquiry that depends on how the AI tool operates and how it was used to create the final work.

The U.S. Copyright Office has issued a statement of policy to clarify its practices for examining and registering works that contain material generated by artificial intelligence. The statement of policy was issued on March 12, 2023, and entitled “Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence”. In this statement of policy, the U.S. Copyright Office will consider whether the AI contributions are the result of “mechanical reproduction” or instead of an author’s “own original mental conception, to which [the author] gave visible form.” 

Examples of works that the U.S. Copyright Office will not register include when a human prompts AI technology to produce a written, visual, or musical work. In this case, the human identifies what it wishes to have depicted and the AI technology generates the work such as music in the style of The Rolling Stones. Examples of works that the U.S. Copyright Office will register include when a human selects or arranges AI-generated material in a sufficiently creative way that “the resulting work as a whole constitutes an original work of authorship.”  In this case, the AI technology generates the material, but the human selects and arranges the material or modifies the AI-generated material to such a degree that the modifications meet the standard for copyright protection. However, the copyright registration will only protect the human-authored aspects of the work, which are “independent of” and do “not affect” the copyright status of the AI-generated material itself.

Let us assume that your work contains human-generated material and AI-generated material. You need to determine whether you have enough human authorship in the work. Once you have determined that there is enough human authorship in the work that contains AI-generated material, you should register your work with the U.S. Copyright Office. However, you have a duty to disclose the inclusion of AI-generated material in the copyright application and provide a brief explanation of the human author’s contributions to the work. To register your work, you should use the Standard Application to identify the human author(s) and provide a brief statement in the “Author Created” field that describes the human authorship. For example, you should not identify the author or co-author as AI technology or the company that provided it. For human authorship, you should fill out the “Author Created” field to claim the portions of your authored work or claim that the “selection, coordination, and arrangement” of the content was created by you, but that the content was created by AI.

In addition, you may exclude the AI-generated material from the Standard Application in the “Limitation of the Claim” section in the “Other” field under the “Material Excluded” heading by providing a brief description of the AI-generated material or identifying the material “generated by artificial intelligence.”  You can also provide additional information in the “Note to CO” field in the Standard Application. If you are unsure of how to fill out the Standard Application, you can provide a general statement that the work contains AI-generated material. If there are no questions about human authorship, the U.S. Copyright Office will not contact you. Otherwise, the U.S. Copyright Office will contact you.

Suppose you have already submitted your copyright application for a work that contains AI-generated material. Can you correct your application? The answer is YES. If the copyright application is currently pending, you should contact the Copyright Office’s Public Information Office and report that your application omitted the fact that the work contained AI-generated material. If your copyright application has registered, you should correct the public record by submitting a supplementary registration. In the supplementary registration, you should identify the original human-authored material in the “Author Created” field, disclaim the AI-generated material in the ”Material Excluded/Other” field, and complete the “New Material Added/Other” field. If there are no questions about human authorship, the U.S. Copyright Office will issue a new supplementary registration certificate with a disclaimer addressing the AI-generated material.

Based on the above, you should register your copyright in the work that contains human-generated material and AI-generated material. If your work contains enough human authorship, you should have a valid copyright registration and prevail in a copyright infringement suit. If you fail to identify the AI-generated material in the copyright registration and sue an alleged infringer for copyright infringement, the alleged infringer may argue that you do not have a valid copyright registration. In addition, a court may disregard the copyright registration in an infringement action pursuant to section 411(b) of the Copyright Act if it concludes that you knowingly provided the U.S. Copyright Office with inaccurate information and the accurate information would have resulted in the refusal of the copyright registration. Therefore, it is recommended that you register your copyright in the work that contains human-generated material and AI-generated material and identify the AI-generated material with the U.S. Copyright Office.

Photo of Daniel H. Bliss of Howard & Howard Daniel H. Bliss of Howard & Howard
Mr. Bliss manages all phases of intellectual property litigation, including case preparation, analysis, and execution. He works with multinational corporations and consortiums in obtaining, managing, evaluating, and licensing intellectual property. His scope of expertise spans a wide range of technology including mechanical, electrical,
…
Mr. Bliss manages all phases of intellectual property litigation, including case preparation, analysis, and execution. He works with multinational corporations and consortiums in obtaining, managing, evaluating, and licensing intellectual property. His scope of expertise spans a wide range of technology including mechanical, electrical, chemical, materials, computer software, and business methods.
Mr. Bliss also focuses on trademark rights. He has experiencemanaging a number of international trademark portfolios and excels in trademark management, protection and prosecution strategies. He has extensive experience in preparing trademark opinions and prosecuting trademark applications in the U.S. He has also handled oppositions and cancellations of trademark applications and registrations in the U.S. Mr. Bliss has international trademark experience and counsels clients on the advantages and disadvantages of foreign registration and on the selection of foreign counsel. He works with foreign counsel regarding search results, prosecuting trademark applications, potential disputes, and all registration matters, ensuring the enforcement of trademark rights after registration.
Mr. Bliss served as an expert on patent law and patent office procedure on several occasions. He testified as an expert on patent law and patent office procedure at trial in connection with Sundance, Inc. and Merlot Tarpaulin & SideKit Mfg. Co., Inc. v. DeMonte Fabricating Ltd. and Quick Draw Tarpaulin Systems, Inc. and Walter DeMonte, Civil Action No. 02-73543, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. He also has experience appearing before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and other various federal courts throughout the United States.
Mr. Bliss prepared and filed over 50 patent applications for an automotive original equipment manufacturer for an electronically-controlled automatic transmission. One of these patent applications produced the patent that won invention of the year in 1990 by the Intellectual Property Organization. He also managed a team of attorneys that prepared and filed over 50 patent applications for a hybrid vehicle for an automotive original equipment manufacturer. Under his leadership, the team obtained the disclosures from a contract supplier, drafted the patent applications and then filed them all on the same day.
Mr. Bliss is a Past President for the Michigan Intellectual Patent Law Association, Past Chair for the Intellectual Property Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, Past President for Michigan State College of Law Alumni Association, and Past Secretary and Treasurer for the Michigan Technological University Alumni Association. He has served as a director on various boards including corporations, associations, and non-profits.
Mr. Bliss is admitted to practice in Michigan, and before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. He is also admitted to practice before the Eastern and Western Districts for the State of Michigan, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court.
For two decades, Mr. Bliss, along with his partner, Gerald E. McGlynn, III, and their associates, have served the global intellectual property community from their firm, Bliss McGlynn, P.C. In July 2013, Bliss McGlynn, P.C. joined the firm of Howard & Howard.
**Not Licensed or Admitted to Practice Law in the State of Nevada
Read more about Daniel H. Bliss of Howard & HowardEmailDaniel's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Lindsay Griffiths Lindsay Griffiths

Lindsay Griffiths is the International Lawyers Network’s Executive Director. She is a dynamic, influential international executive and marketing thought leader with a passion for relationship development and authoring impactful content. Griffiths is a driven, strategic leader who implements creative initiatives to achieve the…

Lindsay Griffiths is the International Lawyers Network’s Executive Director. She is a dynamic, influential international executive and marketing thought leader with a passion for relationship development and authoring impactful content. Griffiths is a driven, strategic leader who implements creative initiatives to achieve the goals of a global professional services network. She manages all major aspects of the Network, including recruitment, member retention, and providing exceptional client service to an international membership base.

In her role as Executive Director, Griffiths manages a mix of international programs, engages a diverse global community, and develops an international membership base. She leads the development and successful implementation of major organizational initiatives, manages interpersonal relationships, and possesses executive presence with audiences of internal and external stakeholders. Griffiths excels at project management, organization, and planning, writes and speaks with influence and authority, and works independently while demonstrating flexibility in thinking, especially in challenging situations. She also adapts to diverse and dynamic environments with constant assessment and recalibration.

JD Supra Readers Choice Top Author 2019

In 2021, the ILN was honored as Global Law Firm Network of the Year by The Lawyer European Awards, and in 2016, 2017, and 2022, they were shortlisted as Global Law Firm Network of the Year. Since 2011, the Network has been listed as a Chambers & Partners Leading Law Firm Network, recently increasing this ranking to be included in the top two percent of law firm networks globally, as well as adding two regional rankings. She was awarded “Thought Leader of the Year” by the Legal Marketing Association’s New York chapter in 2014 for her substantive contributions to the industry and was included in Clio’s list of “34 People in Legal You Should Follow on Twitter.” She was also chosen for the American Bar Association Journal’s inaugural Web 100‘s Best Law Blogs, where judge Ivy Grey said “This blog is outstanding, thoughtful, and useful.” Ms. Griffiths was chosen as a Top Author by JD Supra in their 2019 Readers’ Choice Awards, for the level of engagement and visibility she attained with readers on the topic of marketing & business development. She has been the author of Zen & the Art of Legal Networking since February 2009.

Read more about Lindsay GriffithsEmailLindsay's Linkedin ProfileLindsay's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    ILN IP Insider
  • Organization:
    International Lawyers Network
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo