Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Cannabis Inventory Tracking Vendor Urges State Court to Dismiss Licensed Cultivator’s Lawsuit

By Michael Lafleur, Agustin Rodriguez & Jean Smith-Gonnell on August 8, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Florida-based cannabis inventory tracking vendor Metrc LLC is asking a Colorado state court to toss a dispensary’s lawsuit challenging its process for charging so-called “support fees” as violative of state anti-trust and consumer protection laws.

The lawsuit against Metrc, filed by National Green Source LLC in Denver District Court in June, seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and damages. National Green, a state-regulated marijuana business that presently holds marijuana cultivator, processor, and dispensary licenses from Colorado’s Marijuana Enforcement Division (the division) claims that, since April, Metrc has refused to honor its orders for the RFID inventory tags that National Green needs to comply with Colorado’s marijuana regulations amid a dispute over a bill for allegedly unpaid “support fees.”

Under Colo. Code Regs. 212-3 § 3-805(A), licensees like National Green “are required to use RFID tags issued by a division-approved vendor that is authorized to provide RFID tags for the inventory tracking system.” The regulation provides that “[e]ach licensee is responsible for the cost of all RFID tags and any associated vendor fees.”

Metrc holds state contracts to serve as the inventory tracking vendor in Colorado and approximately two dozen other states, and is the only division-approved vendor in Colorado that can provide RFID tags.

National Green, whose lawsuit alleges it has been a licensed Colorado marijuana business since 2018, claims that through counsel Metrc contacted it in February 2022 to collect what Metrc then described as $28,800 in unpaid “support fees.” National Green’s complaint further alleges that it disputed the bill in March 2022, but that Metrc did not provide supporting statements until March 2023. According to National Green’s lawsuit, the statements Metrc provided sought payment for “monthly reporting fees” amounting to $26,640, discrepancies that Metrc did not explain, and that some of the statements sought fees as far back as March 2014, approximately four years before National Green obtained its first state cannabis license. National Green alleges that, after it refused to pay the bill in April, Metrc refused to continue honoring its RFID tag orders.

In its lawsuit, National Green argues that Metrc breached its contract with National Green, that Metrc should be estopped from refusing to honor National Green’s RFID tag orders, and that Metrc’s conduct violates the Colorado Consumer Protection Act and the Colorado State Antitrust Act of 2023, which Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed into law approximately three weeks before National Green filed suit.

Metrc’s motion to dismiss, filed July 31, seeks dismissal of all of National Green’s claims, arguing that under the terms of the parties’ contract, any dispute over contract terms must be litigated in Florida state court and that the lawsuit in any event fails to state a breach of contract or promissory estoppel claim. Regarding the consumer protection claim, Metrc argues that National Green fails to sufficiently allege that Metrc’s representation of the price of the RFID tags is a deceptive trade practice or that its alleged acts have had a significant public impact. Regarding National Green’s claims under Colorado’s newly amended state anti-trust law, Metrc’s motion contends that the company is immune from suit because the Colorado statue has an exception for activity “supervised by the state itself” and, further, that the agreement between Colorado and Metrc explicitly permits Metrc to demand payment for fees, such as those in the National Green case and to withhold service should a dispensary not settle up.

In a July 17 order, a Colorado district court judge denied National Green’s request to enjoin Metrc from refusing to sell it new RFID tags during the pendency of the lawsuit, ruling that she was unconvinced by National Green’s arguments that it cannot pay the disputed fees without waiving its right to recover them, but she also determined that National Green has a reasonable probability of succeeding on its breach of contract and Colorado Consumer Protection Act claims.

Why It Matters

The resolution of the dispute between National Green and Metrc could influence inventory tracking vendor contracts for state-regulated marijuana industries in jurisdictions across the U.S.


Our Cannabis Practice provides advice on issues related to applicable federal and state law. Marijuana remains an illegal controlled substance under federal law.

Photo of Michael Lafleur Michael Lafleur

Michael is an associate in the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy, and Enforcement Practice Group. Based out of the firm’s Boston office, Mike has deep experience in litigation, investigations, and other regulatory matters involving state-level regulators and state attorneys general.

Read more about Michael LafleurEmail
Photo of Agustin Rodriguez Agustin Rodriguez

Agustin is sought after by clients for his strategic counsel on their most challenging competitive and regulatory compliance issues, including tobacco Master Settlement Agreement issues, federal and state enforcement investigations, licensing and excise tax issues, developing compliance programs, and evaluating advertising and marketing…

Agustin is sought after by clients for his strategic counsel on their most challenging competitive and regulatory compliance issues, including tobacco Master Settlement Agreement issues, federal and state enforcement investigations, licensing and excise tax issues, developing compliance programs, and evaluating advertising and marketing practices. A partner in the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group as well as its Tobacco and Cannabis law practices, he represents manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and suppliers in all aspects of their businesses, including regulatory compliance, FDA requirements, administrative disputes involving federal or state governmental entities, mergers and acquisitions, commercial agreements, and taxation matters.

Read more about Agustin RodriguezEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jean Smith-Gonnell Jean Smith-Gonnell

Jean has dedicated her entire career to the cannabis sector, helping growers, dispensaries, investors, receivers, and other stakeholders achieve their business goals and prepare for unexpected issues. She has extensive experience with medical marijuana, retail marijuana, hemp, and CBD products, and helps clients…

Jean has dedicated her entire career to the cannabis sector, helping growers, dispensaries, investors, receivers, and other stakeholders achieve their business goals and prepare for unexpected issues. She has extensive experience with medical marijuana, retail marijuana, hemp, and CBD products, and helps clients as they establish their businesses, mitigate risk, and resolve disputes. Known for responding to clients within 24 hours or less, Jean is also a go-to advisor for a wide range of day-to-day operational issues.

Read more about Jean Smith-GonnellEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade, Business and Commercial, Cannabis
  • Blog:
    Regulatory Oversight
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo