Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

U.S. Government Revises Export Controls Regarding Commercial Nuclear Commerce with China

By Ed Krauland & Jack Hayes on August 14, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On August 11, 2023, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry & Security (“BIS”) announced amendments to their existing regulations concerning exports of nuclear materials and related equipment destined for China and Macau. (BIS extends its export controls policies and regulations applicable to China to the territory of Hong Kong.) Although the notice from the NRC provided little explanation, the notice issued by BIS explained that the change in the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-774 or EAR) is based on an increased concern with China’s military-civil fusion policy and efforts to expand its military nuclear capability. The changes implemented by the NRC are effective as of August 8, 2023, and the changes implemented by BIS are effective as of August 11, 2023. 

The NRC is responsible for regulating the export and import of certain nuclear materials and nuclear-related equipment as promulgated under 10 CFR Part 110 (Part 110).  The NRC’s export control regime includes general licenses that can be used under certain conditions for specified countries, as well as a procedure for exporters to request specific licenses when needed.  Part 110 sets forth the licensing criteria used by the NRC for regulated nuclear materials and equipment; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), separately regulates the export of related nuclear technology and technical assistance under 10 CFR Part 810 (Part 810). For both general and specific licenses, an overriding consideration is whether an export will be “inimical to the common defense and security or constitute an unreasonable risk to the public health and safety.”   

The NRC’s amendment to Part 110 removes the general license for exports of special nuclear material, source material, or deuterium for nuclear end use in China, even though China was and is not an eligible destination for use of a general license to export certain other civilian nuclear reactor components.  Persons wishing to export such materials (as described in Part 110) must now apply for a specific license in accordance with the NRC’s regulations, pay the requisite licensing fee, and await a decision on the application before undertaking a regulated transaction.

At the same time, BIS issued an amendment to the EAR to impose additional export licensing requirements for exports of dual-use, nuclear-related items (i.e., commodities, software, and technology) to China and Macau.  BIS explained that:

“In response to the People’s Republic of China’s (China) military modernization efforts, military-civil fusion strategy, and expansion of its nuclear forces, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is amending the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding additional nuclear nonproliferation controls on China and Macau.”

The Federal Register notice briefly sets forth the preexisting nuclear-related export controls for dual-use items destined for China (i.e., items not regulated by the NRC or NNSA), including items:

  • on the Commerce Control List (“CCL”) that were controlled for enhanced non-proliferation reasons (“NP1”),
  • destined for military end-uses/end users,
  • when there is knowledge the item will be used in nuclear explosive activities, unsafeguarded nuclear activities, or safeguarded or unsafeguarded nuclear fuel cycle activities,
  • when there is “knowledge” the item is for use in a maritime nuclear propulsion project,
  • and items destined for Chinese entities placed on the Entity List due to their involvement in China’s military nuclear program.

BIS explains that the tightened export controls were “necessary to protect U.S. national security and foreign policy interests by imposing a license requirement to China and Macau on items that could contribute to nuclear activities of concern. These controls are being put in place to further allow the U.S. Government to monitor the export of these items to assure that they are only being used in peaceful activities such as commercial nuclear power generation, medical developments, production of or use in medicine, and nonmilitary related industries.”

Thus, effective August 11, all items on the CCL that show a reason for control of “NP2” now require a specific license from BIS for export or reexport to, or transfer within, China (including Hong Kong) and Macau.  This amendment expands the scope of dual use items subject to the EAR, beyond those previously controlled for NP1 reasons, that must be licensed for (a) export to China, Hong Kong, and Macau, (b) reexport from abroad to those destinations, and (c) transfer to a new end use or end user in country. The licensing policies that are now applied include (a) “extended review or denial” if the item would make a significant contribution to nuclear weapons or their delivery systems, and (b) “a presumption of denial if the item would make a material contribution to the development, production, maintenance, repair, or operation of weapons systems, subsystems, and assemblies.”

In sum, these new amendments reflect the trend toward increasing export controls focused on China where there is a U.S. national security, foreign policy, or economic concern associated with the supply of dual use commercial items, with a focus on military, intelligence, surveillance, and cyber capabilities.  NNSA has not announced any changes to its Part 810 export controls directed at China – such technology exports already require a specific license and do not qualify under a general authorization set forth under Part 810 – but industry should monitor that regime for any change in the licensing review process related to China.

Photo of Ed Krauland Ed Krauland

Edward J. Krauland focuses on export controls/economic sanctions. Ed’s extensive experience includes representing clients on matters involving US and multilateral economic sanctions, defense and nuclear export controls, dual-use export controls under the EAR, anti-boycott compliance, internal investigations and enforcement work, and review of…

Edward J. Krauland focuses on export controls/economic sanctions. Ed’s extensive experience includes representing clients on matters involving US and multilateral economic sanctions, defense and nuclear export controls, dual-use export controls under the EAR, anti-boycott compliance, internal investigations and enforcement work, and review of government procurement regulations in the cross-border context. His practice spans all aspects of these laws, including counseling, compliance work, transactional advice, licensing and opinion work, internal reviews, disclosures, and enforcement actions. He has served as co-chair of the International Trade Committee of the ABA Section of International Law and Practice. He is former Chairman of an ABA-wide Task Force on Gatekeeper Regulation (anti-money laundering compliance), and senior adviser to the ABA Section of International Law and Practice’s anti-money laundering committee.

Read Ed’s full bio.

Read more about Ed KraulandEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jack Hayes Jack Hayes

Jack Hayes has extensive experience providing clients with advice and assistance under ITAR and EAR, as well as US economic sanctions and anti-boycott regulations. Jack frequently handles complex export control matters, including voluntary disclosures, internal investigations of apparent export control violations, pre-closing and…

Jack Hayes has extensive experience providing clients with advice and assistance under ITAR and EAR, as well as US economic sanctions and anti-boycott regulations. Jack frequently handles complex export control matters, including voluntary disclosures, internal investigations of apparent export control violations, pre-closing and post-closing acquisition export compliance due diligence, export control audits, and assessments of compliance obligations and risks in accordance with relevant international trade regulations. He also provides guidance on brokering requirements and reporting obligations for certain fees, commissions, and political contributions related to sales of defense articles and defense services, prepares export and reexport license and agreement applications for submission, undertakes commodity jurisdiction and export classification analyses of items and services under the ITAR and EAR, drafts registration material change notifications, and develops compliance policies, programs, and training materials.

Read Jack’s full bio.

Read more about Jack HayesEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo