Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Surprise… No Surprises Act Arbitration Is Too Expensive

By Kirk S. Davis & Danielle C. Gordet on August 28, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Providers finally obtained court ordered relief to the $350 administrative fee each party was required to pay as part of the Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process under the No Surprises Act. Until the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury (collectively, the Departments) set a new administrative fee amount, the administrative fee for disputes initiated on or after August 3, 2023, will be $50 per party per dispute.

In December of 2022, the Departments had increased the fee from $50 to $350, effective January 1, 2023, to address “the rising volume of disputes and additional expenditures associated with the Departments’ enhanced role in 2023 in conducting pre-eligibility reviews to address the backlog of disputes.” Thereafter, the Texas Medical Association (TMA) brought suit against the Departments arguing that the $350 administrative fee was prohibitive for providers with small-value claims. On August 3, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas found in favor of TMA (See Opinion and Order).  The court concluded that the IDR fee violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which requires agencies to undergo a “notice-and-comment” procedure when issuing substantive rules, unless an exception applies. The court also found that the Departments’ October 7, 2021 Rule regarding the batching criteria (directing the manner in which parties submit payment) also violated the APA.

In response to the court’s decision, the Departments announced on August 11, 2023, that the administrative fee amount for any disputes initiated on or after August 3, 2023, will be $50 per party per dispute. However, for disputes initiated on or after January 1, 2023 through August 2, 2023, where a party had “paid” the administrative fee to a certified IDR entity, the administrative fee remains $350 and refunds will not be issued. 

A party is considered to have “paid” the administrative fee to the certified IDR entity and; therefore, is not eligible for a refund, if they took either of the following actions, regardless of whether the administrative fee was reflected in the certified IDR entity’s accounts before August 3, 2023:

  • Sent a paper check via mail postmarked before August 3, 2023; or
  • Electronically submitted payment, including by electronic check, before August 3, 2023.

However, a party may receive a refund if they sent a paper check via mail postmarked on or after August 3, 2023, or electronically submitted payment on or after August 3, 2023. When either of these scenarios occur, certified IDR entities are instructed to immediately cancel invoices to parties for open disputes initiated on or after January 1, 2023, through and including August 2, 2023. Certified IDR entities must then reissue invoices to those parties reflecting the $50 administrative fee. The Departments acknowledge the disparity that may exist if one party to a dispute is deemed to be eligible for a refund while the other one is not, but does not address equalizing any such disparity.

We are available to assist parties seeking guidance regarding adherence to the No Surprises Act as these changes continue to develop.

Photo of Kirk S. Davis Kirk S. Davis

An accomplished litigator, Kirk Davis represents hospitals and health systems in complex regulatory compliance issues and disputes with a focus on medical malpractice and peer review hearings. Kirk has decades of experience in the peer review process and has been involved in all…

An accomplished litigator, Kirk Davis represents hospitals and health systems in complex regulatory compliance issues and disputes with a focus on medical malpractice and peer review hearings. Kirk has decades of experience in the peer review process and has been involved in all aspects of hearings, from prosecuting physicians to defending medical staff and serving as a hearing officer. He helps hospitals comply with federal and state laws by recommending peer review best practices and procedures. In addition to his work on medical malpractice matters, Kirk handles disputes between physicians in private practices and effectively resolves contentious medical practice dissolution through alternative dispute resolution. Kirk has served as an arbitrator in various healthcare-related matters and is a sought after speaker on health law topics. He is Board Certified in Health Law by The Florida Bar and recognized by Chambers USA as a leading lawyer in healthcare.

Read more about Kirk S. DavisEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Danielle C. Gordet Danielle C. Gordet

Danielle Gordet focuses her practice on healthcare, including healthcare compliance, conflicts of interest, scope of practice issues, physician contracting, and regulations. Her ability to identify, investigate, and resolve complex issues in collaboration with healthcare administrators allows her to provide them with effective counsel…

Danielle Gordet focuses her practice on healthcare, including healthcare compliance, conflicts of interest, scope of practice issues, physician contracting, and regulations. Her ability to identify, investigate, and resolve complex issues in collaboration with healthcare administrators allows her to provide them with effective counsel in developing policies and procedures which reduce the risk of inappropriate conduct and prevent non-compliance. She provides expertise on federal and state healthcare statutory and regulatory issues, including adherence to the Stark Law, the Anti-Kickback Statute, and licensure compliance. In addition, Danielle assists manufacturers of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated products in obtaining necessary FDA clearances for their devices. Danielle works with healthcare administrators on resolving a variety of legal matters, including issues surrounding hospital bylaws, licensure and credentialing, telemedicine, codes of conduct, and Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. On behalf of healthcare providers, she negotiates and drafts contractual agreements including medical directorships, physician employment, clinical trials, and consulting arrangements.

Read more about Danielle C. GordetEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Health Law Rx
  • Organization:
    Akerman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo