Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

California Climate Accountability Package Poised to Disrupt

By Alex J. Brackett, Patrick A. Wallace & McGuireWoods LLP on October 3, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

During the week of September 11, 2023, the California Legislature passed a series of bills known collectively as the “California Climate Accountability Package” (“CCAP”).  The CCAP is comprised of three bills: S.B. 252 (applicable only to two California state pension funds, and not discussed further herein), S.B. 253 (the “Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act” of “CCDA”) and S.B. 261 (the “Climate-Related Financial Risk Act” or “CFRA”).  If Governor Newsom follows through on his stated intention to sign the entire CCAP into law, and if the package survives the inevitable legal challenges that are sure to come, these new disclosure laws could prove to be highly disruptive to companies across the United States—many of which are likely unaware it impacts them.

Under the CCDA, U.S. companies “doing business in California” with total revenues in excess of $1 billion (not limited to California-related revenue) will have to begin measuring and publicly reporting their company-wide greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions, starting in 2026.  In the first year, this will include scope 1 and 2 emissions (those emanating from sources that a company owns or directly controls, regardless of location (e.g., from fleet vehicles, manufacturing operations, etc.) (scope 1), and those a company causes indirectly and that come from where the energy it purchases and uses is produced, regardless of location (e.g., emissions caused when generating the electricity, steam, heating or cooling that is used in company buildings) (scope 2)).  Starting in 2027, they will also have to measure and report scope 3 emissions: those not produced by the company itself, but for which it is indirectly responsible both upstream and downstream (e.g., via the goods and services it buys, from business travel and employee commutes, and from the processing and use of products it sells, etc.).

Under the CFRA, U.S. companies doing business in California with total revenues in excess of $500 million will have to begin preparing a biennial climate-related financial risk report, starting January 1, 2026.  The report must disclose the entity’s climate-related financial risk and the measures it has adopted to reduce and adapt to climate-related financial risk, and must be posted to the company’s website.

Failure to comply with these new laws will carry potential civil penalties of up to $500,000 (CCDA) and $50,000 (CFRA), respectively.

Trap for the Unwary

The thresholds for “doing business in California” are remarkably low for companies with revenues at or near the CCDA and CFRA thresholds.  A U.S. company with such revenue levels will be subject to the CCDA and CFRA if it:

  • Is organized or commercially domiciled in California;
  • Has sales in California in a given tax year that exceed the lesser of $690,144 (for 2022) or 25 percent of the entity’s total sales (including sales by an agent or independent contractor of the entity);
  • Has real and tangible personal property in California in a given tax year valued in excess of the lesser of $69,015 (for 2022) or 25 percent of the entity’s total real and tangible personal property; or
  • Pays compensation in California in a given tax year in excess of the lesser of $69,015 (for 2022) or 25 percent of the entity’s total compensation paid.

For some companies, a single sale to a California counterparty could potentially cross this threshold.  The only exception to either law is for insurance companies, which are excused from the climate-related financial risk reporting of the CFRA.

Compliance Challenge

For publicly traded companies subject to the pending SEC climate reporting rules, or for companies subject to the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”), CCDA and CFRA compliance may not prove to be a significant challenge (or at least not a significant added burden).  The CCDA will require measurement and reporting of emissions in conformance with the “GHG Protocol,” a standard developed by the World Resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development.  The CFRA will require assessment of climate-related financial risk in accord with a framework published by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”).  Those standards are the basis for the CSRD’s comparable disclosure requirements, and the leading global standards for relevant measurement and reporting of emissions and climate-related risks. 

However, many private U.S. companies not otherwise subject to comparable emissions and climate-related measurement, assessment and reporting requirements may find themselves faced with a steep learning curve and operational challenge, based on relatively limited exposure to the California market. 

Uncertainty Ahead

While Governor Newsom appears committed to signing the CCAP into law, it is less certain whether and when it might actually take effect, and how California market participants will react.  First and foremost, it would be surprising for some or all of the CCAP to go into effect without legal challenges being filled by multiple parties.  The CCAP had staunch opposition on its way to passage, and litigation could potentially delay its taking effect on time, if at all.  Second, as companies with exposure to the California market wake up to the reach and obligations of the CCDA and CFRA, there is a chance some will chose to forego or substantially alter the manner in which they engage with California markets.  At least some degree of market displacement can be expected.

It is also possible that the CCAP signals a broader trend, and that other states may follow suit.  It seems clear that at least one purpose for enactment of the CCAP is to flex California’s muscle as the largest economy in the United States and nearly the fourth largest in the world, and to prod action more widely across the country.

For now, U.S. companies that do business in California at any appreciable level need to start paying attention to the CCAP and preparing for the possibility that they could soon have significant obligations to meet under either or both. Please refer to our California Climate Accountability Package – Overview and Implications handout for further information on the basic structure, triggers and contours of the CCDA and CFRA.     

Photo of Alex J. Brackett Alex J. Brackett

Alex is a member of the Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department, and co-head of McGuireWoods’ Strategic Risk and Compliance team. His practice focuses primarily on advising and supporting corporate and individual clients in the areas of white collar criminal defense and…

Alex is a member of the Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department, and co-head of McGuireWoods’ Strategic Risk and Compliance team. His practice focuses primarily on advising and supporting corporate and individual clients in the areas of white collar criminal defense and internal investigations.

Read more about Alex J. BrackettEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Patrick A. Wallace Patrick A. Wallace

Patrick is a member of the firm’s nationally ranked Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation practice. He focuses on internal investigations and related litigation. Patrick has assisted clients in navigating responses to federal criminal investigations, regulatory inquiries, Congressional investigations, and whistleblower reports. He…

Patrick is a member of the firm’s nationally ranked Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation practice. He focuses on internal investigations and related litigation. Patrick has assisted clients in navigating responses to federal criminal investigations, regulatory inquiries, Congressional investigations, and whistleblower reports. He has experience across a range of industries, including technology, energy, financials services, and heavy industry.

Read more about Patrick A. WallaceEmail
Show more Show less
McGuireWoods LLP

At McGuireWoods, we deliver quality work, personalized service and exceptional value. We use technology to provide efficient legal solutions and employ a diverse workforce to bring real-world and innovative perspectives to meeting our clients’ needs. With more than 1,000 lawyers and 21 strategically…

At McGuireWoods, we deliver quality work, personalized service and exceptional value. We use technology to provide efficient legal solutions and employ a diverse workforce to bring real-world and innovative perspectives to meeting our clients’ needs. With more than 1,000 lawyers and 21 strategically located offices worldwide, McGuireWoods uses client-focused teams to serve public, private, government and nonprofit clients from many industries, including automotive, energy resources, healthcare, technology and transportation.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    Subject to Inquiry
  • Organization:
    McGuireWoods LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo