The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) released its draft regulatory framework for automated decision-making technology (ADMT) on November 27. These regulations are a preview of what new requirements may look like for companies currently regulated by the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (collectively, the “CCPA”).

The proposed regulations generally require comprehensive disclosures and opt-out provisions for California consumers and employees regarding the use of ADMT.

The proposal defines ADMT broadly to include AI and systems that process personal information (PI), which humans use to assist in decision-making. Notably, ADMT’s definition includes “profiling,” which refers to inference-making systems often used to assess employee job performance and/or consumer location.

The draft imposes three key requirements for businesses covered by the CCPA:

1. Provide pre-use notice about the use of ADMT.

2. Provide an opt-out mechanism for the use of ADMT to process personal information.

3. Provide a method for requesting access to specified information about how ADMT is used.

One important, but limited, exception allows businesses to forgo an opt-out right if the ADMT is necessary to provide the good or perform the service specifically requested by the consumer, if there is no reasonable alternative processing method and the business is not profiling for behavioral advertising use.

This framework is still an initial recommendation and is subject to change. However, businesses subject to the CCPA should be aware of the impact it may have on their business and how they can comply with the regulatory requirements. For example, companies using AI to categorize employee performance or consumers for targeted advertising should be apprised of these developments. The CPPA will discuss the proposal on December 8, with the formal rulemaking process beginning in early 2024. 

Photo of Rodolfo Rivera Aquino Rodolfo Rivera Aquino

Rodolfo Rivera Aquino is a business litigation associate at Farella Braun + Martel. He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US) certification.

Contact:

Photo of Sushila Chanana Sushila Chanana

Sushila Chanana is a high-stakes technology litigator and legal advisor, who has a background in privacy and cybersecurity. She counsels companies on compliance with data privacy laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), the California Invasion…

Sushila Chanana is a high-stakes technology litigator and legal advisor, who has a background in privacy and cybersecurity. She counsels companies on compliance with data privacy laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). She also represents companies in complex civil matters, including patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secrets disputes. Her clients have ranged from startups to Fortune 500 companies. In addition to representing clients in federal and state court, at both the trial and appellate levels, Sushila also assists clients with matters before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

She counsels companies on compliance with various data protection laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

Contact: schanana@fbm.com

Photo of Vanessa Ing Vanessa Ing

Vanessa Ing represents clients in a wide range of complex litigation matters, including shareholder disputes, government investigations, consumer product litigation, and employment matters.

Contact: ving@fbm.com