Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

SPAC Developments: SEC Amendments to SPAC IPO and de-SPAC Related Rules

By Melissa Pulgiano on February 7, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

February 14, 2024, PLI Webinar

3:00pm – 4:00pm ET

Register here.

In 2022, the SEC proposed significant amendments to the rules and forms addressing the treatment of special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”) in connection with their initial public offerings (“IPOs”) and subsequent de-SPAC transactions. The proposed amendments were quite controversial and had a chilling effect on the SPAC market and resulted in changes to market practice. On January 24, 2024, the SEC met to consider the adoption of final rules, which, market participants hope will take into account concerns raised by commenters.

During this session hosted by PLI, Mayer Brown partners, John Ablan, Eddie Best, and Anna Pinedo, will discuss:

  • The key differences between the proposed rules and final rules
  • Conflicts of interest, dilution, and fairness disclosures in connection with SPAC transactions
  • Alignment of disclosures for de-SPAC transactions with those for traditional IPOs
  • Projections disclosures
  • Financial statement and other disclosure matters
  • Underwriter liability
  • Key takeaways and practical considerations

For more information, visit the event website.

  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Free Writings + Perspectives
  • Organization:
    Mayer Brown
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo