Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FinCEN issues analysis of increasing elder financial exploitation

By Kristen E. Larson, Beth Moskow-Schnoll, Peter D. Hardy & Ballard CFS Group on May 2, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Table of Contents

  • Historical Context
  • Reporting
  • Key Takeaways

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) recently issued a Financial Trend Analysis (“Analysis”) focusing on patterns and trends identified in Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) data linked to Elder Financial Exploitation (“EFE”) involving scams or theft perpetrated against older adults.

The Analysis is a follow up to FinCEN’s June 2022 EFE Advisory (“2022 Advisory”). The Analysis reviews BSA reports filed between June 15, 2022 and June 15, 2023 that either used the key term referenced in the 2022 Advisory (“EFE FIN-2022-A002”) or checked “Elder Financial Exploitation” as a suspicious activity type.  In its 2022 Advisory, FinCEN warned financial institutions (“FIs”) about the rising trend of EFE, which FinCEN defines as “the illegal or improper use of an older adult’s funds, property, or assets, and is often perpetrated either through theft or scams.” The 2022 Advisory identified 12 “behavioral” and 12 “financial” red flags to help FIs detect, prevent, and report suspicious activity connected to EFE. Additionally, FinCEN recommended EFE victims file incident reports to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) and the Federal Trade Commission. Consistent with a risk-based approach to BSA compliance, FinCEN encouraged FIs to perform additional due diligence where appropriate.

Reports of EFE are significant, and increasing. In the Analysis, FinCEN identified 155,415 relevant BSA filings over this period, reporting approximately $27 billion in EFE-related suspicious activity. Further, FinCEN continues to receive EFE BSA reports, and has received on average 15,993 reports per month between June 15, 2023 and January 15, 2024.

Key findings from the Analysis include:

  • Banks filed 72% of all EFE-related BSA filings;
  • 80% of EFE-related BSA filings involve scams (the transfer of money to a stranger or imposter for a promised benefit that the older adult does not receive). Most elder scam reports referenced “account takeover” by an unknown perpetrator where fraudsters relied on unsophisticated means to steal the funds;
  • 20% of EFE-related BSA filings involve theft (a trusted person steals an older adult’s assets, funds, or income). Unfortunately, 40% of elder theft reports named the elder adult’s children as the perpetrators; and
  • Perpetrators mostly rely on unsophisticated means to steal funds that minimize direct contact with FI employees, including previously compromised usernames and/or passwords, guessing passwords, or phishing emails that elicit replies containing sensitive information.

As stated above, banks filed the vast majority of EFE-related BSA filings, followed by money services businesses (“MSBs”), credit unions and securities/futures institutions. Within MSBs, virtual asset service providers accounted for 42% of the filings.

For elder theft, filers report an average suspicious activity amount of $98,863 and a median amount of $23,762. For elder scams, filers reported an average suspicious activity amount of $129,483 and a median amount of $33,499.

Although methods of elder theft varied, they generally relied on cash withdrawals, card transactions, online bill pay, and funds transfers made for the abuser’s benefit, while making little effort to obfuscate the transactions. The Analysis provides that in elder scams, money was most commonly transmitted through checks and domestic wires. Further, “[p]erpetrators of both EFE scams and theft utilize methods of siphoning funds that avoid direct contact with depository institutions or MSB personnel[,]” who “would likely identify EFE activity more frequently if victims or perpetrators conducted transactions in person, and presumably not permit the requested transactions.”

FinCEN’s manual review of the filings indicated perpetrators used the following scams: impersonation (8%), romance scams (9%), tech support (10%), account takeover (22%), scam unidentified (23%), and 41 other scam types (28%).

In the Appendix, FinCEN describes the most prominent scams identified in the filings, which should be included in elder abuse compliance trainings by FIs.

Link to Historical Context Historical Context

The FinCEN Analysis and 2022 Advisory do not arise in a vacuum. Rather, they occur on the shoulders of earlier regulatory warnings.

In August of 2016, the CFPB issued an elder financial abuse report, “Report and Recommendations: Fighting Elder Financial Exploitation through Community Networks,” and a related resource guide, “A Resource Guide for Elder Financial Exploitation Prevention and Response Networks,” where it made recommendations to existing networks and key stakeholders on how to develop and improve their communities’ efforts to combat elder financial abuse.

In July 2016, the CFPB issued an update to an earlier advisory, “Reporting of Suspected Elder Financial Exploitation by Financial Institutions” which recommended actions for banks and credit unions to take to prevent, recognize, report, and respond to elder financial exploitation. In February 2019, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a report, “Suspicious Activity Reports on Elder Financial Exploitation: Issues and Trends,” drawing on non-public data derived from EFE-related BSA filings from 2013 to 2017. During that period, MSBs accounted for 58% of the EFE-related BSA filings. The losses averaged $34,200 and were greater for elder theft than elder scams.

In March of 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice, the FBI and other federal and state partners announced the largest coordinated sweep of elder fraud cases, resulting in criminal cases against more than 260 defendants who allegedly victimized more than two million Americans, most of them elderly. All told, the offenders allegedly engaged in financial schemes which exceeded more than $750 million in losses.

Link to Reporting Reporting

In addition to filing a Suspicious Activity Report (“SAR”), FinCEN recommends in the Analysis that FIs refer customers who may be victims of EFE to the Department of Justice’s National Elder Fraud Hotline at 833-FRAUD-11 or 833-372-8311 for assistance with reporting suspected fraud to the appropriate government agencies.

EFE is receiving attention from states as well. In 2023, 34 states and Puerto Rico addressed financial exploitation of the elderly and vulnerable adults in their legislative sessions.  Most state laws require mandatory reporting of elder financial abuse to adult protective services or law enforcement agencies. The U.S. Department of Justice posts these state laws on its website for reference. Further, some state attorneys general are proactively enforcing these laws against FIs who, in the state’s view, are not adequately protecting and reporting elder financial exploitation.

Link to Key Takeaways Key Takeaways

EFE is a growing problem, and regulators expect FIs to not only report EFE, but also to protect the elderly against scams. To that end, FIs should develop, implement and maintain internal protocols and procedures for protecting elder account holders, including:

  • Arranging the sharing of account information with third parties designated as “trusted” by elder account holders;
  • Offering age-friendly services to older consumers, including protective opt-in account features such as withdrawal limitations, alerts, transaction restrictions for merchant categories; information on planning for incapacity or disability; and honoring powers of attorney; and
  • Ask detailed questions when the elder account holder requests account transactions that are unusual for the account (i.e., wire transfers and large cash withdrawals) and monitor account activity to help prevent and detect scams and theft.

Further, FIs must train their employees to prevent, detect and respond to EFE. The training should include descriptions of indicators of potential EFE and preventative measures and action steps for responding and reporting EFE.

Beth Moskow-Schnoll

moskowb@ballardspahr.com | 302.252.4447 | view full bio

Beth is the Managing Partner of the firm’s Delaware office. She is a litigator focused on white collar crime, regulatory enforcement and compliance, and complex civil litigation, with an emphasis on banking and other financial services…

moskowb@ballardspahr.com | 302.252.4447 | view full bio

Beth is the Managing Partner of the firm’s Delaware office. She is a litigator focused on white collar crime, regulatory enforcement and compliance, and complex civil litigation, with an emphasis on banking and other financial services litigation. She represents major financial institutions, bringing actions against fraudulent debt relief companies, and defending against consumer financial services lawsuits.

Before joining Ballard Spahr, Beth was a federal prosecutor with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Delaware for more than a decade. She investigated and prosecuted financial fraud, including money laundering, bank and credit card fraud, asset forfeiture, and tax offenses.  She also led the SAR review team for the District of Delaware.

Read more about Beth Moskow-SchnollEmail
Show more Show less
Peter D. Hardy

hardyp@ballardspahr.com | 215.864.8838 | view full bio

Peter is a national thought leader on money laundering, tax fraud, and other financial crime. He is the author of Criminal Tax, Money Laundering, and Bank Secrecy Act Litigation, a comprehensive legal treatise published by Bloomberg…

hardyp@ballardspahr.com | 215.864.8838 | view full bio

Peter is a national thought leader on money laundering, tax fraud, and other financial crime. He is the author of Criminal Tax, Money Laundering, and Bank Secrecy Act Litigation, a comprehensive legal treatise published by Bloomberg BNA.  Peter co-chairs the Practising Law Institute’s Anti-Money Laundering program, and serves on the Steering Committee for the Cambridge Forum on Sanctions & AML Compliance

He advises corporations and individuals from many industries against allegations of misconduct ranging from money laundering, tax fraud, mortgage fraud and lending law violations, securities fraud, and public corruption.  He also advises on compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering requirements.  Peter handles complex litigation involving allegations of fraud or other misconduct.

Peter spent more than a decade as a federal prosecutor before entering private practice, serving as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Philadelphia working on financial crime cases. He was a trial attorney for the Criminal Section of the Department of Justice’s Tax Division in Washington, D.C.

Read more about Peter D. HardyEmailPeter's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance Monitor
  • Organization:
    Ballard Spahr LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo