Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

EV Trade Secrets Litigation Series: Tesla v. Rivian – A High-Stakes Legal Showdown

By Baldassare Vinti & Elizabeth Shrieves on August 12, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Continuing our series on electric vehicle (EV) trade secret litigation, see here and here, a California judge has tentatively given Tesla the green light to proceed with a trial against rival Rivian in March of 2025. This will pit two major players in the EV industry head-to-head in a high-stakes legal battle over proprietary EV battery and manufacturing technology.

Tesla filed its lawsuit against Rivian, Tesla’s competitor in the EV industry, back in July of 2020. Telsa alleged that Rivian recruited and subsequently employed Tesla employees. According to Tesla, Rivian then instructed those employees to divulge Tesla’s proprietary trade secrets. Tesla identified the individual ex-employees as defendants in the complaint as well, alleging specific factual circumstances regarding each ex-employee’s violation of Tesla’s confidentiality policies and, in some cases, refusal to return highly sensitive trade secret and proprietary information regarding Tesla’s EV manufacturing methods. According to the case pleadings, Rivian, for its part, allegedly encouraged these employees to steal Tesla’s trade secrets and confidential documentation and bring that information directly to Rivian.

Since 2020, Rivian has been fighting to dismiss Tesla’s allegations, while Tesla has repeatedly amended its complaint to specify the alleged misappropriation relating to Tesla’s proprietary EV battery technology. Rivian has consistently denied any wrongdoing and argued that Tesla’s lawsuit is merely a competitive business tactic to harm Rivian’s reputation in the industry. Rivian’s repeated legal attempts to dismiss Tesla’s allegations, however, have been unsuccessful, culminating in the Court’s most recent decision. Despite Rivian’s arguments that it investigated these allegations and took some disciplinary actions in response, the Court found there remained questions as to whether Rivian’s investigation and response were sufficient. As such, the case is currently set to proceed to trial in 2025. 

Tesla’s aggressive approach in enforcing its intellectual property rights against competitors has been at the forefront of EV litigation in recent years. Just last month, Tesla filed a lawsuit against its equipment supplier, Matthews International Corp., alleging trade secret misappropriation and unfair business practices when Matthews allegedly gave those trade secrets to Tesla’s competitors. Tesla is also rumored to be the “victim company” referenced in a sealed trade secret misappropriation lawsuit filed against two ex-employees who allegedly stole proprietary battery assembly information and used it to start a competing Chinese company of their own. The case against Rivian, however, may be Tesla’s first test at trial as it relates to Tesla’s enforcement of its EV trade secrets against a major competitor.

Tesla’s repeated efforts to enforce its intellectual property rights—against ex-employees, competitors, and manufacturers alike—reflect a growing trend in the EV industry: the reliance on trade secret litigation to safeguard competitive and confidential information. Tesla’s approach underscores the importance for EV companies to be vigilant in their approach to trade secret management. This includes implementing rigorous internal policies to protect sensitive information, regularly training employees on confidentiality obligations, actively monitoring for any signs of intellectual property theft, and being prepared to take immediate and decisive legal action when breaches occur. Proskauer’s extensive legal and technical expertise can help EV companies navigate these complex issues, ensuring they are well-prepared to protect their own intellectual property or defend against potential allegations.

Photo of Baldassare Vinti Baldassare Vinti

Baldassare (“Baldo”) Vinti is the head of Proskauer’s Intellectual Property Litigation Group.

Baldo is a first-chair trial lawyer known for navigating complex, bet-the-company intellectual property disputes across industry verticals and next-generation technologies. With over 25 years of experience, Baldo represents leading global companies…

Baldassare (“Baldo”) Vinti is the head of Proskauer’s Intellectual Property Litigation Group.

Baldo is a first-chair trial lawyer known for navigating complex, bet-the-company intellectual property disputes across industry verticals and next-generation technologies. With over 25 years of experience, Baldo represents leading global companies and universities in patent, trade secret, false advertising, consumer class actions and technology-related breach of contract litigation in federal and state courts as well as before the International Trade Commission.

Baldo is particularly sought after for his courtroom skill and strategic depth, having led trials, arbitrations and appeals in high-stakes disputes involving technologies ranging from pharmaceuticals and medical devices to encryption, digital media, diagnostics, mobile platforms and software. Baldo has represented global corporations, including Arkema S.A., British Telecommunications PLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Henry Schein, Inc., Maidenform Brands Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corp., Ossur North America Inc., Panasonic Corp., Sony Corp., Welch Foods, Inc. and Zenith Electronics LLC.

With a background in pharmacy, Baldo brings deep domain expertise to pharmaceutical litigation. He has a proven record of driving successful outcomes in complex pharmaceutical milestone payment, royalty and licensing disputes—often stemming from collaboration agreements, co-development deals, and M&A transactions—where the financial and strategic stakes run high.

In addition to representing corporate clients, Baldo works closely with university innovation and technology transfer offices to maximize the financial return of research investments. He develops tailored IP asset optimization strategies and aggressively enforces intellectual property rights to protect and monetize core innovations—whether through high-value licensing agreements, shaping and advancing spin-out company development, or successful litigation.

Baldo also provides strategic counsel on IP due diligence, complex licensing, IP structuring, patentability and freedom-to-operate analyses, and infringement and validity opinions. He advises boards and executive teams on aligning IP strategy with business objectives, mitigating risk and maximizing the value of innovation assets.

A frequent author and commentator on intellectual property topics, Baldo has been quoted in the National Law Journal, Bloomberg BNA, Law360, Westlaw Journal and Inside Counsel magazine. He is also a regular contributor to articles published in Medical Product Outsourcing magazine that deal with the medical device industry.

Baldo served as a judicial intern for Hon. John E. Sprizzo of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and for Hon. Charles A. LaTorella of the New York Supreme Court.

Read more about Baldassare VintiEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Elizabeth Shrieves Elizabeth Shrieves

Elizabeth (Beth) Shrieves is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Intellectual Property and Patent Law groups. Beth has experience litigating in numerous federal district courts across the United States, as well as before the Federal Circuit, U.S. Patent…

Elizabeth (Beth) Shrieves is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Intellectual Property and Patent Law groups. Beth has experience litigating in numerous federal district courts across the United States, as well as before the Federal Circuit, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and International Trade Commission. Beth’s experience covers a wide variety of products and technology involving software and applications, medical devices and technology, electrical hardware, telecommunications, supercapacitors, automotive engines, weapon systems, and consumer products. She has counseled clients throughout all stages of litigation, including both plaintiff and defense work, from pre-suit investigation, initial pleadings, discovery, trial, and through appeal.

Beth graduated from George Mason University School of Law where she earned her J.D., Magna Cum Laude. Prior to earning her law degree, she received a bachelor’s degree from Wake Forest University where she also graduated Magna Cum Laude. Beth also previously worked as a paralegal where she gained a deeper understanding of the nuances of commercial litigation.

Read more about Elizabeth ShrievesEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    Proskauer on Trade Secrets
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo