Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Notable Ruling Roundup

By David T. Biderman & Tommy Tobin on August 14, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Our notable ruling roundup aims to keep our readers up to date on recent rulings in the food & consumer packaged goods space.

test
  • Montiquento Corbett, et al. v. Pharmacare U.S., Inc., No. 3:21-cv-00137-JES-AHG (E.D. Cal. – March 29, 2024): The Southern District of California trimmed proposed classes in a motion for class certification in a suit challenging the marketing and labeling of black elderberry products. Plaintiffs allege the products make unsubstantiated and unapproved disease prevention claims, meaning that the products are not lawfully marketed dietary supplements. After evaluating consumer surveys, the court certified classes of Missouri and California consumers. While the parties disputed the findings of their respective experts, the court ultimately concluded that these disputes were insufficient to preclude class certification for the Missouri and California classes; however, the court did deny certification as to a nationwide class. Opinion can be viewed here.
  • Brendan Peacock v. Pabst Brewing Co., LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00568-DJC-CKD (E.D. Cal. – March 15, 2024): The Eastern District of California granted summary judgment in favor of defendant in a case challenging the labeling of Olympia Beer. Plaintiff argued that the marketing and labeling of the beer was false or misleading because it prompted consumers to think it was brewed using naturally filtered, artisan water from the Olympia, Washington, region. The court determined that plaintiff failed to meet his burden to show a reasonable consumer would be deceived because plaintiff offered insufficient evidence beyond the plaintiff’s own personal reading of the product’s labeling. The court also noted that the results of consumer surveys indicated that most respondents did not mention the water source as a reason for purchasing the beer. Opinion can be viewed here.

If you are a food or CPG company contact interested in receiving our daily email update on filings and notable rulings, please reach out to Kellie Hale with your request to be added: khale@perkinscoie.com.

Photo of David T. Biderman David T. Biderman

David Biderman, a partner in Perkins Coie’s San Francisco and Los Angeles offices, focuses his practice on mass tort litigation and consumer class actions. He heads the firm’s Mass Tort and Consumer Litigation group. He has represented a wide variety of companies in…

David Biderman, a partner in Perkins Coie’s San Francisco and Los Angeles offices, focuses his practice on mass tort litigation and consumer class actions. He heads the firm’s Mass Tort and Consumer Litigation group. He has represented a wide variety of companies in state and federal courts in California for 30 years.

On consumer class actions, David represents packaged food companies, coffee companies, dairy companies, footwear companies and others whose nutritional or health claims have been challenged. He also has represented search engines and other online companies. He has a record of favorable results for clients. He successfully tried a major consumer fraud class action on behalf of one of the world’s major search engines in a case involving online gambling advertisements. For that same client, he negotiated a favorable settlement of a class action challenging its online advertising pricing. He represented a major coffee retailer in defeating a class action on standing grounds. He also has litigated pre-emption defenses arising out of food labeling and obtained a dismissal for a client whose nutritional statements were challenged.

For fifteen years, David managed the firm’s full-service product liability team responsible for defending over 1,000 toxic tort cases pending in Los Angeles and Northern California state courts. These cases entailed ongoing trial activity at various levels for several trials set each month. The highly experienced and well-coordinated team has handled thousands of asbestos toxic tort cases for a variety of clients, including FORTUNE 500 companies from such industries as consumer products, aerospace manufacturing, household goods, dry cleaning and industries that generate electromagnetic fields, such as electric utilities and operators of wireless communications systems.

Read more about David T. BidermanEmailDavid's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Tommy Tobin Tommy Tobin

Thomas Tobin’s practice focuses on complex commercial litigation and class action matters involving statutory, constitutional, and regulatory issues in a range of industries, including food and beverage, consumer packaged goods, and cannabis. In the food and beverage sector, Tommy has experience defending false…

Thomas Tobin’s practice focuses on complex commercial litigation and class action matters involving statutory, constitutional, and regulatory issues in a range of industries, including food and beverage, consumer packaged goods, and cannabis. In the food and beverage sector, Tommy has experience defending false advertising claims and consumer protection claims for well-known international corporations.

Read more about Tommy TobinEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Food Litigation News
  • Organization:
    Perkins Coie LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo