Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Appraisal Prepayments and Respondent-Side Game Theory

By Steve Hecht on September 3, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

It’s been eight years since the Delaware legislature amended the appraisal statute to allow appraisal respondents the discretion to prepay some or all of the merger consideration, and at a time of their choosing.

We have previously blogged to mark the anniversary of this statutory amendment, one year after the amendment and two years afterward; seems like a good idea to refresh on this lively issue today.

The amount and the timing of any prepayment is entirely within the discretion of the appraisal respondent; the stockholder has no say-so or other input into this piece. The appraisal target is faced with a game-theory proposition of wanting to pay enough to stop the interest clock on outstanding merger consideration, on the one hand, while leaving ample room to argue that the appraised fair value should fall somewhere comfortably below merger price, on the other hand.  After all, it is well settled Delaware law that prepayment amounts are not subject to clawback or disgorgement, so any amounts prepaid cannot be recovered by the appraisal target.  Hence the decision-making around how best to size the prepayment amount to meet the competing interests of (i) halting the interest accrual without (ii) setting too high a floor on the appraisal fair-value determination.  

By our anecdotal experience, prepayment amounts tend to be in the range of approximately 75 to 80% of merger consideration, with those levels increasing in a high-interest rate environment.  (This is contra to some early academic commentary, which suggested prepayment would be rare.) Of course, the exact prepayment amount will obviously vary in any particular case, based on such factors as the respondent’s financing costs, integration success and litigation-risk management concerns, among others.

Photo of Steve Hecht Steve Hecht

Steve Hecht is a go-to trial lawyer for hedge funds, institutional investors, family offices, university endowments, venture funds and other investors interested in utilizing the legal process to create value for their own investors. Whether by activist litigation, fiduciary duty claims, or appraisal…

Steve Hecht is a go-to trial lawyer for hedge funds, institutional investors, family offices, university endowments, venture funds and other investors interested in utilizing the legal process to create value for their own investors. Whether by activist litigation, fiduciary duty claims, or appraisal and other valuation strategies, Steve has extensive experience across the gamut of options for shareholders.  He regularly tries cases in Delaware Chancery Court and around the country for clients seeking outsized returns. Steve is a partner of Rolnick Kramer Sadighi LLP.

Read more about Steve HechtEmailSteven's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Valuation Litigation & Shareholder Rights Blog
  • Organization:
    Rolnick Kramer Sadighi LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo