On October 9, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Innovation Center, issued a Request for Information (RFI) about the Innovation Center’s proposed Medicare $2 Drug List Model (the M2DL Model), which aims to test whether offering low-cost, clinically important generic drugs can improve medication adherence, lead to better health outcomes, and improve satisfaction with the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit. The RFI includes a sample list of prescription drugs that it intends to include and seeks input from healthcare stakeholders on the sample list of drugs and other features (i.e., outreach efforts and maximizing stakeholder participation) of the model. Comments in response to the RFI may be submitted through the Innovation Center’s online survey portal by December 9, 2024.

Background

In February 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) initially announced the model by releasing a report, in response to President Biden’s Executive Order (EO) 14087, “Lowering Prescription Drug Costs for Americans.” The EO directed the Secretary of HHS to consider and select for testing new Innovation Center health care payment and delivery models that would lower drug costs and promote access to innovative drug therapies for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. It states that these models should lead to lower cost-sharing for commonly used drugs and support value-based payment that promotes high-quality care.

The HHS report outlines CMS’ plans to address prescription drug affordability and improve the quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries as directed by the EO. In the report, CMS stated that the model would build upon provisions enacted by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) to reduce prescription drug prices, including the provision that would limit annual Part D out-of-pocket costs to $2,000. In addition to the M2DL Model, CMS identified two other models, the Cell & Gene Therapy Access and Accelerating Clinical Evidence models, that it will test to further address prescription drug spending in Medicaid and Medicare. 

Medicare $2 Drug List Model

Under the M2DL Model, Medicare Part D sponsors are able to offer a standard set of generic drugs at a fixed copayment of up to $2 for a month’s supply and up to $5 for a three-month supply across all cost-sharing phases of the Part D prescription drug benefit (up to the out-of-pocket limit) for a beneficiary in a participating plan.

The RFI proposes a number of medications on the $2 Drug List, which target common conditions among Medicare beneficiaries, that would not be subject to utilization management requirements (except for safety-related requirements) at any network pharmacy. Participation in the model would be voluntary for Part D sponsors, including those offering both Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MA-PDs) plans and Standalone Prescription Drug plans (PDPs). The RFI’s sample $2 Drug List includes 101 drugs covering therapeutic uses across 15 clinical categories, including blood pressure/cardiovascular, cholesterol, diabetes, and substance use and mental health drugs.

The Innovation Center states that the RFI represents a starting point for the development of the M2DL Model which could begin as early as January 2027. It requests feedback on a number of issues by outlining the following key questions for interested parties:

  • $2 Drug List Development Process: Are there additional data sources, criteria, or considerations the Innovation Center should consider in developing future versions of the $2 Drug List?
  • Maximizing Plan Participation: What factors may inform the decision by Part D sponsors to participate or not participate in this model? To maximize beneficiary, prescriber, and pharmacist awareness of and use of these low-cost generics, are there other policies the Innovation Center should consider to encourage broad and balanced (i.e., MA-PD and PDP) Part D sponsor participation in the M2DL Model?
  • CMS Outreach Efforts: To achieve a widespread level of awareness among relevant stakeholders, what outreach activities should CMS conduct to be most effective to reach prescribers, beneficiaries and their caregivers, and pharmacists, respectively?
  • Part D Sponsor Outreach and Education Efforts for Beneficiaries: Are there best practices used by Part D sponsors’ communications and marketing efforts to prescribers, beneficiaries, and their caregivers about the details of a given Part D plan? Please provide examples of specific marketing elements or techniques that have either been effective or ineffective at helping beneficiaries (including low-income populations and underserved populations), and their prescribers navigate their Part D plan options. Additionally, how can Part D sponsors utilize the real-time benefit tools to educate prescribers and beneficiaries about the $2 Drug List?
  • Assessment of Model Impact: What outcomes and metrics will be most important for the Innovation Center to monitor and evaluate for this model? Beyond CMS’s existing administrative data, what data sources might help to evaluate the impact of this model? Given the sample drug list as proposed and timeframe of the model test, what health-related outcomes should the evaluation consider measuring?
  • Drug List Modifications: How could future changes to the $2 Drug List be best communicated to beneficiaries, prescribers, pharmacies, and plans?

Takeaways

By identifying generic covered Part D drugs that would target common conditions in the M2DL Model, the Innovation Center states that it is working to advance the affordability of generic drugs and to address uncertainty beneficiaries face in assessing out-of-pocket costs prior to filling a prescription, which may lead to increased medication adherence and other measurable health outcomes. To promote the $2 Drug List, the Innovation Center plans to conduct outreach efforts to raise awareness among beneficiaries, healthcare providers, and industry professionals. Additionally, through ongoing evaluation, CMS will monitor the model’s impact on drug utilization, provider satisfaction, and healthcare outcomes. Medicare Part D plan sponsors, drug manufacturers, pharmacists, and researchers should consider submitting comments in response to the RFI.

In the coming months, we expect that CMS will release additional information on the M2DL Model and continue to issue prescription drug pricing policy developments. For more information, or you would like assistance in preparing and submitting responses to the RFI, please contact the professionals listed below, or your regular Crowell Health Solutions contact.

Photo of Troy A. Barsky Troy A. Barsky

Troy Barsky is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office, and serves as a member of the firm’s Health Care Group Steering Committee where he focuses on health care fraud and abuse, and Medicare and Medicaid law and policy. Troy counsels…

Troy Barsky is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office, and serves as a member of the firm’s Health Care Group Steering Committee where he focuses on health care fraud and abuse, and Medicare and Medicaid law and policy. Troy counsels all types of health care entities, including hospitals, group practices, and health plans on the physician self-referral law (Stark Law) and the Anti-Kickback Statute, innovative healthcare delivery models, such as Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), and Medicare & Medicaid payment and coverage policy. He also defends clients seeking resolution of government health care program overpayment issues or fraud and abuse matters through self-disclosures and negotiated settlements with the U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Health & Human Services Office of the Inspector General and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Photo of Stephen Holland Stephen Holland

Stephen Holland is a senior counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Government Affairs Group, where he leverages his extensive experience advising members of Congress and their staff as a policy advisor and attorney active in health care legislation. Stephen has been responsible for crafting

Stephen Holland is a senior counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Government Affairs Group, where he leverages his extensive experience advising members of Congress and their staff as a policy advisor and attorney active in health care legislation. Stephen has been responsible for crafting dozens of provisions in law to improve food, drug, and medical device innovation and regulation at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), health coverage and access, public health communication and coordination, prescription drug affordability, and emergency preparedness and response.

Prior to joining Crowell, Stephen served in senior policy roles in the U.S. House of Representatives for over 10 years. Most recently, Stephen spent five years on the Energy and Commerce Committee staff under the leadership of Ranking Member and former Chairman Frank Pallone of New Jersey.  On the Committee staff, he was responsible for legislative action related to numerous agencies and programs, including the FDA, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), and the 340B drug program. Notably, his work on the Committee included leading negotiations and drafting of the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022 (FDORA), a package of more than 50 policies to expand research, development, and innovation for drugs, medical devices, and personal care products. During the COVID-19 response, Stephen worked to secure billions of dollars for research, development, distribution, and promotion of vaccines, treatment, and diagnostic tests in the CARES Act, the Fiscal Year 2021 Omnibus, and the American Rescue Plan Act.

Photo of Allison Kwon Allison Kwon

Allison Kwon supports Crowell Health Solutions, a strategic consulting firm affiliated with Crowell & Moring, to help clients pursue and deliver innovative alternatives to the traditional approaches of providing and paying for health care, including through digital health, health equity, and value-based health…

Allison Kwon supports Crowell Health Solutions, a strategic consulting firm affiliated with Crowell & Moring, to help clients pursue and deliver innovative alternatives to the traditional approaches of providing and paying for health care, including through digital health, health equity, and value-based health care. She is a health care policy consultant in the Washington, D.C. office.

Photo of Sarah Cheney Sarah Cheney

Sarah Cheney is a healthcare policy intern in the Washington, D.C. office. She supports Crowell Health Solutions, a strategic consulting firm affiliated with Crowell & Moring, to help clients pursue and deliver innovative alternatives to the traditional approaches of providing and paying for…

Sarah Cheney is a healthcare policy intern in the Washington, D.C. office. She supports Crowell Health Solutions, a strategic consulting firm affiliated with Crowell & Moring, to help clients pursue and deliver innovative alternatives to the traditional approaches of providing and paying for health care, including through digital health, health equity, and value-based health care.

Prior to joining Crowell Health Solutions, Sarah worked at a government affairs and intelligence company where she provided healthcare policy consulting services to clients. As an associate consultant, she led regulatory compliance projects for clients interested in drug affordability and transparency. She also monitored legislative updates to public and private insurance options related to coverage, expansion, fraud, and abuse. Sarah also worked as a Policy Analyst under Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers’ Advisory Council on Equity and Inclusion. She graduated from the University of Wisconsin Madison with a Bachelor’s of Science in Legal Studies and is currently a Master of Public Policy student at The George Washington University.