Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

NLRB waters down management rights in latest union-friendly Board decision, but potential Republican Board majority in early 2025 may turn the tide toward employers

By Ryan Kunkel & Adam Belzberg on December 13, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Since 2019, employers have relied heavily on the management rights clauses in collective bargaining agreements to make unilateral workplace changes involving operational decisions.  They did so with the protection of the “contract coverage” standard established by the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) in the 2019 case MV Transportation Inc., 368 NLRB No. 66, where the plain language of a collective bargaining agreement – including management rights clauses – determined whether unilateral changes were permitted.  However, that decision, issued by a Republican-majority in President-elect Trump’s first term, was recently overturned by the Biden Board in Endurance Environmental Solutions, LLC, 373 NLRB No. 141 (2024).  Now, employers must show a “clear and unmistakable” waiver to bargain the specific change at issue. 

“Clear and unmistakable” can be a difficult burden to meet. It often requires showing the parties explicitly discussed the potential change during bargaining and the union agreed to waive its right to bargain it.  In Endurance Environmental Solutions, the employer installed security cameras in its trucks to monitor drivers without first bargaining with the union, believing the change was covered by the management rights clause that provided it could make unilateral changes to equipment.  The Board ruled that there was no “clear and unmistakable” waiver by the union, and the unilateral change was a violation of the National Labor Relations Act.

This decision has major implications for employers of unionized workforces because they can no longer rely on broadly worded management rights clauses to make unilateral changes. The decision underscores the importance of collective bargaining and obtaining union consent for certain workplace changes.

Change may be near

Employers may not be burdened with this standard for long.  The Biden Board has been led by three Democratic appointed – and union-friendly – members.  However, one of those appointees, NLRB Chair Lauren McFerran, recently lost a key procedural vote in the United States Senate to approve her to serve a second term, that would have lasted until 2026.  Now, McFerran is likely to lose her seat on the Board on December 16, 2024.  That would leave the Board with two Democratic appointed members, one Republican appointee, and two vacancies.  President-elect Trump will likely appoint two new employer-friendly members to fill those vacancies immediately upon taking office in January 2025.  This shift could lead to a reversal of the Endurance “clear and unmistakable” standard and other recent pro-union decisions, potentially reinstating more employer-friendly standards similar to those seen during the previous Trump administration.  While this pendulum shift is typical when the presidency changes parties, the swing will likely come sooner this time with President-elect Trump filling two vacancies immediately upon taking office.

This evolving landscape highlights the need for employers to stay informed and consult with labor law experts to navigate these changes effectively.

Photo of Ryan Kunkel Ryan Kunkel

Ryan Kunkel is a trial lawyer who litigates employment-related disputes in federal and state court and private arbitration, and counsels employers to help mitigate risk and prevent disputes from reaching litigation in the first place. Ryan specializes in pursuing and defending cases involving…

Ryan Kunkel is a trial lawyer who litigates employment-related disputes in federal and state court and private arbitration, and counsels employers to help mitigate risk and prevent disputes from reaching litigation in the first place. Ryan specializes in pursuing and defending cases involving unfair competition, such as employee non-competition, non-solicitation, and trade secret obligations, especially in the financial and manufacturing industries. His practice also includes litigating before the National Labor Relations Board, arbitrating labor grievances, and helping management navigate and resolve complex labor disputes, including organizing drives and work stoppages.

Click here for Ryan Kunkel’s full bio.

Read more about Ryan KunkelEmailRyan's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Adam Belzberg Adam Belzberg

Adam Belzberg represents and advises employers, from small businesses to international corporations, in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has particular experience representing employers in the agriculture, construction, and energy industries. Adam’s litigation experience includes class action and individual litigation arising…

Adam Belzberg represents and advises employers, from small businesses to international corporations, in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has particular experience representing employers in the agriculture, construction, and energy industries. Adam’s litigation experience includes class action and individual litigation arising under various state and federal employment laws. He also provides daily advice and counsel to employers on employment issues including employment policies, non-compete, non-solicitation, and trade secret issues and regularly represents management before the NLRB in cases involving union representation and unfair labor practices, negotiating collective bargaining agreements, and arbitrating labor and employment disputes.

Click here for Adam Belzberg’s full bio.

Read more about Adam BelzbergEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Uncategorized
  • Blog:
    World of Employment
  • Organization:
    Stoel Rives LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo