Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New Year Brings New Automatic Enrollment and Escalation Requirements for Some Recently Adopted 401(k) and 403(b) Plans

By Sam Butler & Audrey Fenske on January 6, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 requires certain 401(k) and 403(b) plans to include automatic enrollment and escalation features for the first plan year beginning after December 31, 2024, meaning that for those plans with a calendar plan year, the new year brought a new compliance obligation.

Beginning on January 1, 2025, 401(k) and 403(b) plans adopted after December 29, 2022 must automatically enroll plan participants to make pre-tax contributions between 3% and 10% of eligible pay during their first year of participation.  Then, unless the participant affirmatively elects otherwise, the percentage of pay deferred must increase by one percentage point on the first day of each plan year, until the participant is contributing at least 10%, but no more than 15% of pay.

Certain plans adopted after December 29, 2022 are exempt from this requirement, including:

  • plans sponsored by an employer, if the employer has existed for less than three years;
  • plans sponsored by employers with less than eleven employees;
  • governmental plans;
  • church plans; and
  • SIMPLE plans.

Employers should keep in mind guidance published by the IRS in December 2023 covering the application of these requirements to plan mergers.  In this guidance, the IRS noted that in certain circumstances, the merger of a plan exempt from the requirements with a plan that is subject to the requirements will result in the merged plan being subject to the requirements, but in other circumstances the surviving plan will be exempt from the requirements.  Employers considering a plan merger should consult with employee benefits counsel.

Employers who fail to properly implement the new requirements may be able to correct these errors under the IRS’s Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (“EPCRS”).  Under EPCRS, employers that timely correct automatic enrollment and escalation errors and comply with the applicable notice requirements are able to take advantage of reduced corrective contribution requirements. Please contact any member of Stinson’s Employee Benefits practice if you have questions about the new automatic enrollment and escalation requirements or correcting failures to properly implement these new requirements.

Photo of Sam Butler Sam Butler
Read more about Sam ButlerEmail
Photo of Audrey Fenske Audrey Fenske

Audrey works with a wide range of clients, from individual executives, small private companies, and non-profit organizations to large multinational, publicly traded corporations to develop benefits, incentive, and equity plans, and executive employment agreements. She helps companies draft and amend qualified plans, reviews…

Audrey works with a wide range of clients, from individual executives, small private companies, and non-profit organizations to large multinational, publicly traded corporations to develop benefits, incentive, and equity plans, and executive employment agreements. She helps companies draft and amend qualified plans, reviews service provider contracts, advises on fiduciary issues, and advises on operational and tax issues impacting compensation and benefit programs, including issues under Code Sections 409A, 457(f), and 280G. Audrey also assists clients in participation in IRS (EPCRS) and DOL (VFCP) programs.

Read more about Audrey FenskeEmailAudrey's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    Benefit Notes
  • Organization:
    Stinson LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo