Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

U.S. Supreme Court Lifts Initial Injunction Against Enforcement Of Corporate Transparency Act, But A Separate Injunction Continues To Halt Implementation 

By Robin M. Bergen, Matthew Yelovich, Nowell D. Bamberger, Rachel Gerwin, James Corsiglia & Michael G. Sanders on January 24, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The long and winding road of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) litigation (as discussed in our most recent CTA client alert) has taken another turn, and this time companies are driving blind. On New Year’s Eve, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) asked the U.S. Supreme Court to lift the injunction imposed by a Texas court and let the law go into effect while the legal contest over the constitutionality of the law is pending. Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court resoundingly agreed with the DOJ. In an 8-1 ruling, the nation’s highest Court lifted the stay on enforcement of the statute. One might assume that the Supreme Court ruling ended the injunction issue, but a separate order issued by a different federal judge in Texas blocking enforcement of the statute nationwide remains in place.

As a result, the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a statement today confirming that “reporting companies are not currently required to file beneficial ownership information with FinCEN despite the Supreme Court’s action.”

Given the Supreme Court ruling, we would ordinarily expect that the DOJ would move swiftly to have this second nationwide injunction lifted, but it is unclear what position the new Trump administration will take. We believe it likely the DOJ would be successful in having the injunction revoked if it seeks to do so, but even if the injunction is lifted, what would happen next?

If this last injunction is lifted, FinCEN could issue a new filing deadline, but FinCEN is a bureau within the United States Department of the Treasury. Like the DOJ, the Treasury Department is part of the executive branch, which is now headed by President Trump. FinCEN could act on its own to set a new deadline or follow the dictates of the acting Secretary of the Treasury, David Lebryk – or the White House could weigh in.  

The road ahead remains uncertain on several fronts. The courts, FinCEN, the Treasury Department, DOJ, and the White House all could make decisions that determine when or if the CTA comes into effect. We will continue to promptly provide updates on future developments.

Photo of Matthew Yelovich Matthew Yelovich

Matthew M. Yelovich’s practice focuses on government and internal investigations, including defending companies and individuals in a wide range of high-stakes domestic and international enforcement actions and trials.

Read more about Matthew YelovichEmail
Photo of Nowell D. Bamberger Nowell D. Bamberger

Nowell D. Bamberger’s practice focuses on complex civil litigation and government investigations, with a particular focus on cross-border matters.

Read more about Nowell D. BambergerEmail
Photo of James Corsiglia James Corsiglia

James Corsiglia’s practice focuses on litigation, particularly securities fraud and other criminal and corporate investigations.

Read more about James CorsigliaEmail
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Cleary Enforcement Watch
  • Organization:
    Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo