Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Thomson Reuters Enter. Centre GmbH et al v. ROSS Intelligence Inc.

By Publisher on February 19, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On February 11, 2025, the U.S. district court for the District of Delaware revised its own 2023 opinion and found on summary judgment that ROSS Intelligence’s (“Ross”) use of certain Westlaw “headnotes” to develop Ross’s AI-powered legal research tool constituted copyright infringement and not fair use. The court granted most of copyright owner Thomson Reuters’ motion for partial summary judgment on direct copyright infringement, granted Thomson Reuters’ motion for partial summary judgment on fair use, and denied Ross’s motion for summary judgment on fair use. In evaluating the fair use factors, the court emphasized that “Ross’s AI is not generative AI (AI that writes new content itself).”

Read more

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property, Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    Incontestable Blog
  • Organization:
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo