Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

FTC and DOJ Affirm Commitment to Biden-Era Merger Guidelines

By Brian McCalmon on February 24, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson announced to FTC staff on February 18 that the FTC would retain the 2023 Merger Guidelines as the framework for reviewing mergers and acquisitions. Citing the need for stability between presidential administrations, Chairman Ferguson rejected calls to set aside the 2023 Merger Guidelines to draft new ones or reinstate the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines that had been in place prior to 2023. In his own memo to the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division Staff, Acting Assistant Attorney General Omeed Assefi echoed Chairman Ferguson’s endorsement, signaling that the Division would also continue to apply the 2023 Guidelines in the name of enforcement continuity.

The decision to endorse the 2023 Guidelines is somewhat surprising given the circumstances of their adoption (a 3-0 vote from an all-Democrat Commission and adoption by the Biden DOJ) and the scrutiny they’ve undergone since adoption. Many commenters have criticized, among other things, their de-emphasis of modern economic theory in favor of reliance on older case law and their adoption of very low thresholds to apply presumptions of anti‑competitiveness. Endorsement of the 2023 Guidelines by the current administration has been touted as a win by antitrust hawks. Chairman Ferguson and Acting AAG Assefi did leave open the door to future modification, with Ferguson stating that “if experience teaches that revisions are appropriate, then the agencies can consider revisions as they have done in the past.” For now, however, parties planning mergers and acquisitions should continue to rely on the 2023 Guidelines when predicting enforcement decisions.

Photo of Brian McCalmon Brian McCalmon

Brian McCalmon is a Litigation shareholder in Vedder Price’s Washington, DC office, focusing on Antitrust and Consumer Protection. His antitrust practice focuses on conduct and merger investigations and cases brought by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission…

Brian McCalmon is a Litigation shareholder in Vedder Price’s Washington, DC office, focusing on Antitrust and Consumer Protection. His antitrust practice focuses on conduct and merger investigations and cases brought by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general. He also represents companies in investigations of marketing, advertising, and privacy practices before the FTC and other consumer protection agencies.

Read more about Brian McCalmonEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative
  • Blog:
    Federal Regulatory & Enforcement Insider
  • Organization:
    Vedder Price PC
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo