Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

The SEC Weighs In on Meme Coins

By Joanna Cline, Jay Dubow & Ethan G. Ostroff on March 3, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
FinTech_1200x600_0008_GettyImages-880534636-768x384

In a stated effort to provide greater clarity on the application of federal securities laws to “crypto assets,” the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Corporation Finance has released its views on “meme coins.” In sum, while the offer and sale of meme coins may not be subject to federal securities laws, fraudulent conduct related to meme coins could still be subject to enforcement actions.

What Are Meme Coins?

In the staff statement, the SEC defines a “crypto asset” as “an asset that is issued and/or transferred using distributed ledger or blockchain technology, including, but not limited to, so-called “virtual currencies,” “coins,” and “tokens,” and that relies on cryptographic protocols. Meme coins, in turn, are characterized as a type of crypto asset inspired by internet memes, characters, current events, or trends. While each meme coin may have unique features, they typically share certain characteristics:

  • Entertainment and Social Interaction: Meme coins are often purchased for entertainment, social interaction, and cultural purposes.
  • Market Demand and Speculation: The value of meme coins is primarily driven by market demand and speculation, making them akin to collectibles.
  • Limited Use or Functionality: Meme coins generally have limited or no practical use or functionality.
  • Market Price Volatility: Due to their speculative nature, meme coins tend to experience significant market price volatility.

Regulatory Perspective

The Division of Corporation Finance has determined that transactions involving meme coins, as described, do not constitute the offer and sale of securities under federal securities laws. Consequently, individuals participating in the offer and sale of meme coins are not required to register their transactions with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, nor do they need to fall within any exemptions from registration. As a result, meme coin purchasers and holders are not protected by federal securities laws.

Under Section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act and Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the term “security” includes various financial instruments such as “stock,” “note,” and “bond.” Meme coins do not fit within these categories as they do not generate yield or convey rights to future income, profits, or assets of a business. Therefore, meme coins are not considered securities.

The Division also applied the “investment contract” test from SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. to determine if meme coins could be considered securities. The Howey test evaluates whether there is an investment in an enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits derived from the efforts of others. The Division concluded that meme coins do not meet this criterion for the following reasons:

  • No Investment in an Enterprise: Meme coin purchasers are not pooling their funds to be deployed by promoters or third parties for coin or a related enterprise.
  • No Expectation of Profits from Others’ Efforts: The value of meme coins is derived from speculative trading and market sentiment, similar to collectibles. Promoters of meme coins are not undertaking managerial or entrepreneurial efforts from which purchasers could reasonably expect profit.

This statement does not apply to meme coins that deviate from the described characteristics or to products labeled as “meme coins” to evade federal securities laws. The Division will evaluate the economic realities of each transaction. Further, although the offer and sale of meme coins may not be subject to the federal securities laws, fraudulent conduct related to the same may be subject to enforcement action or prosecution by other federal or state agencies.

Photo of Joanna Cline Joanna Cline

From arbitration and corporate disputes to complex class actions, clients count on Joanna for proactive, strategic advice and sound, effective advocacy in court.

Read more about Joanna ClineEmailJoanna's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Jay Dubow Jay Dubow

Jay co-leads the firm’s Securities Investigations + Enforcement Practice Group. He focuses his practice on complex business litigation, with a special emphasis on defending against shareholder derivative and securities class action litigation. He also represents clients involved in investigations by the U.S. Securities…

Jay co-leads the firm’s Securities Investigations + Enforcement Practice Group. He focuses his practice on complex business litigation, with a special emphasis on defending against shareholder derivative and securities class action litigation. He also represents clients involved in investigations by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities, and various self-regulatory organizations, including the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA). He also conducts internal investigations on behalf of clients. Such investigations have included allegations involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), whistle blower claims, financial fraud, and civil and criminal violations of various federal and state laws.

Read more about Jay DubowEmailJay's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Ethan G. Ostroff Ethan G. Ostroff

Ethan’s practice focuses on financial services litigation and compliance counseling, as well as digital assets and blockchain technology. With a long track record of successful litigation results across the U.S., both bank and non-bank clients rely on him for comprehensive advice throughout their

…

Ethan’s practice focuses on financial services litigation and compliance counseling, as well as digital assets and blockchain technology. With a long track record of successful litigation results across the U.S., both bank and non-bank clients rely on him for comprehensive advice throughout their business cycle.

Read more about Ethan G. OstroffEmailEthan G.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Financial Services Law Monitor
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo