Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Trump Administration Proposes Eliminating CTA Requirements for All U.S. Companies

By Robin M. Bergen, Derek M. Bush, Nowell D. Bamberger, Matthew Yelovich, James Corsiglia & Michael G. Sanders on March 6, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
This is a shot of the owner of New Zealand watch company - Hunters Race.
Hunters Race, Unsplash

We noted in our last Corporate Transparent Act (CTA) update that on February 27, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the U.S. Treasury Department, announced that it would not take any enforcement actions against any company that does not file or update beneficial ownership information required under the CTA until after FinCEN issued a new interim rule.  The Treasury Department announced yesterday that it will not enforce any penalties or fines against “U.S. citizens or domestic reporting companies or their beneficial owners” for not filing this information even after the new interim rule.  Instead, the Treasury Department said that it will issue a proposed rulemaking “that will narrow the scope of the rule to foreign reporting companies only.” 

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said: “This is a victory for common sense . . . [and the Department’s] action is part of President Trump’s bold agenda to unleash American prosperity by reining in burdensome regulations, in particular for small businesses that are the backbone of the American economy.”

We anticipate that this announcement may trigger litigation challenging the Administration’s rulemaking process or whether any proposed rule-based exemption of U.S. companies is consistent with the requirements of the CTA itself.  The announcement suggests that the new rule will exempt a category of companies covered by the text of the statute, which will increase the threat of litigation.

Meanwhile, CTA litigation proceeds.  In one of several cases challenging the constitutionality of the CTA, Small Business Association of Michigan v. Janet Yellen, a Michigan federal trial court judge has ruled that the CTA is unconstitutional because the statute’s beneficial ownership requirements violate the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment guarantee against unreasonable searches.  It remains to be seen whether the Trump Administration will appeal this decision.  Thus far, the Administration has continued to contest any court rulings finding the CTA unconstitutional.

If you have any questions concerning this memorandum, please feel free to contact your regular contacts at the firm.

Photo of Nowell D. Bamberger Nowell D. Bamberger

Nowell D. Bamberger’s practice focuses on complex civil litigation and government investigations, with a particular focus on cross-border matters.

Read more about Nowell D. BambergerEmail
Photo of Matthew Yelovich Matthew Yelovich

Matthew M. Yelovich’s practice focuses on government and internal investigations, including defending companies and individuals in a wide range of high-stakes domestic and international enforcement actions and trials.

Read more about Matthew YelovichEmail
Photo of James Corsiglia James Corsiglia

James Corsiglia’s practice focuses on litigation, particularly securities fraud and other criminal and corporate investigations.

Read more about James CorsigliaEmail
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Cleary Enforcement Watch
  • Organization:
    Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo