Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Trump Administration Proposes Eliminating CTA Requirements for All U.S. Companies

By Robin M. Bergen, Derek M. Bush, Nowell Bamberger, Matthew Yelovich, James Corsiglia & Michael G. Sanders on March 6, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

We noted in our last Corporate Transparent Act (CTA) update that on February 27, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the U.S. Treasury Department, announced that it would not take any enforcement actions against any company that does not file or update beneficial ownership information required under the CTA until after FinCEN issued a new interim rule.  The Treasury Department announced yesterday that it will not enforce any penalties or fines against “U.S. citizens or domestic reporting companies or their beneficial owners” for not filing this information even after the new interim rule.  Instead, the Treasury Department said that it will issue a proposed rulemaking “that will narrow the scope of the rule to foreign reporting companies only.” 

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said: “This is a victory for common sense . . . [and the Department’s] action is part of President Trump’s bold agenda to unleash American prosperity by reining in burdensome regulations, in particular for small businesses that are the backbone of the American economy.”

We anticipate that this announcement may trigger litigation challenging the Administration’s rulemaking process or whether any proposed rule-based exemption of U.S. companies is consistent with the requirements of the CTA itself.  The announcement suggests that the new rule will exempt a category of companies covered by the text of the statute, which will increase the threat of litigation.

Meanwhile, CTA litigation proceeds.  In one of several cases challenging the constitutionality of the CTA, Small Business Association of Michigan v. Janet Yellen, a Michigan federal trial court judge has ruled that the CTA is unconstitutional because the statute’s beneficial ownership requirements violate the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment guarantee against unreasonable searches.  It remains to be seen whether the Trump Administration will appeal this decision.  Thus far, the Administration has continued to contest any court rulings finding the CTA unconstitutional.

If you have any questions concerning this memorandum, please feel free to contact your regular contacts at the firm.

  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial
  • Blog:
    Cleary M&A and Corporate Governance Watch
  • Organization:
    Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo