Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

SEC Drops Climate Disclosure Defense

By David Breyer & Anna T. Pinedo on March 27, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On March 27, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted to end its defense of the climate-related disclosure rules, which, even as scaled back when finally adopted, still would have required fairly substantial disclosures regarding climate-related risks as well as, for certain companies, disclosures relating to greenhouse gas emissions.  As a result, agency attorneys will no longer appear before the Eighth Circuit, where the various challenges by both states and private parties were consolidated for hearing in Iowa v. SEC.  In a letter penned to the Eighth Circuit, the SEC yielded all oral argument time back to the court and stated that its counsel is no longer authorized to advance the case.  The SEC’s involvement in the proceeding has, in effect, ceased.

The climate-related disclosure rules were adopted in a 3-2 vote along party lines on March 6, 2024 under then-Chair Gensler.  The final rules represented a substantial scale-back from those initially proposed in 2022.  The final rules were slated for a multi-phased implementation that would not have been fully consummated until 2033.  Nonetheless, the rules were met with significant pushback and immediate lawsuits alleging, among other things, that the rules represented an unlawful expansion of authority and were overly-burdensome in a manner that would discourage and impede business. While the Eighth Circuit has not yet issued a ruling or statement on the matter and the case remains pending, it is likely that the SEC’s announcement has sealed the fate of the climate change rules.  The SEC’s press release is available here.  Commissioner Crenshaw released a statement in which she observes that “the current Commission would like to dismantle [the] rule. And they would like to do so unlawfully.  The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) governs the process by which we make rules.  The APA prescribes a careful, considered framework that applies both to the promulgation of new rules and the rescission of existing ones.  There are no backdoors or shortcuts. But that is exactly what the Commission attempts today.”  Commissioner Crenshaw’s full statement is available here.

Photo of Anna T. Pinedo Anna T. Pinedo

Anna Pinedo is a partner in Mayer Brown’s New York office and a member of the Corporate & Securities practice. She concentrates her practice on securities and derivatives. Anna represents issuers, investment banks/financial intermediaries and investors in financing transactions, including public offerings and…

Anna Pinedo is a partner in Mayer Brown’s New York office and a member of the Corporate & Securities practice. She concentrates her practice on securities and derivatives. Anna represents issuers, investment banks/financial intermediaries and investors in financing transactions, including public offerings and private placements of equity and debt securities, as well as structured notes and other hybrid and structured products.

Read Anna’s full bio.

Read more about Anna T. PinedoEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Free Writings + Perspectives
  • Organization:
    Mayer Brown
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo