Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

SPC Issues Judicial Interpretation (II) on Marriage Law, Covers Fraudulent Divorce & Live-streaming Gifts

By Publisher on April 1, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On 15 Jan. 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the “Interpretation on the Application of the Marriage and Family Part of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China (II)” (hereinafter the “Interpretation (II)”, 关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法典〉婚姻家庭编的解释(二)) along with typical cases, providing guidance on the application of law in the areas of marriage, family, and property.

Over the past three years, Chinese courts have concluded approximately 2 million marriage and family cases annually, accounting for about 12 percent of all first-instance civil cases. Among these, divorce dispute cases amount to approximately 1.5 million annually, representing nearly 80 percent of all family cases.

The Interpretation (II) contains 23 articles that take a problem-oriented approach, addressing common issues such as malicious debt evasion through divorce, parental contributions to children’s post-marriage housing purchases, and rewards on live streaming platforms.

Highlights include:

  • If a debtor maliciously evades debt through divorce, creditors may refer to Articles 538 or 539 of the Civil Code regarding creditors’ right of revocation to request the revocation of relevant property division clauses in the divorce agreement to protect their legitimate rights and interests.
  • If one spouse, through bigamy, cohabitation with others, or other circumstances that violate public order and good morals, gives away or transfers community property to others at a manifestly unreasonable low price, the other spouse may claim that the contract is invalid and demand the return of property according to law.
  • If one spouse, without the consent of the other, rewards hosts through live streaming platforms, which is clearly exceed the family’s general consumption level and seriously harms the interests of the community property, it may be determined as “squandering of community property”. The other spouse may request division of community property during the marriage, or request that the rewarding spouse receive less or no share during divorce property division.

 

 

Photo by Jay on Unsplash

  • Posted in:
    International
  • Blog:
    China Justice Observer
  • Organization:
    China University of Political Science and Law
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo