Case Summary: Estate of Magdalena Rios De Dominguez v. Renee Kay Dominguez (CV-24-0102-PR)

In a significant April 2025 ruling, the Arizona Supreme Court clarified that a facially valid forged deed can trigger the five-year statute of limitations under A.R.S. § 12-524 to quiet title. This case, Estate of Magdalena Rios De Dominguez v. Renee Kay Dominguez, arose from a family dispute over the ownership of a vacant Maricopa County lot. Magdalena, the mother-in-law of Renee, alleged that a 2003 deed purporting to convey the property to Renee and her late husband was forged.

However, because the deed was facially valid and Renee paid property taxes and claimed ownership for over five years, the Court held that the statute of limitations barred Magdalena’s claim—even if the deed was forged.  (Actually, the Court assumed it was forged for purposes of its analysis.)  So and as explained below, Renee owned the property by “adverse possession,” though a different kind than we usually hear about.

Key Holding: A “Recorded Deed” Includes Facial Forgeries

The Court ruled that a “recorded deed” under § 12-524 includes any facially valid deed—even one that is later shown to be a forgery. Thus, the quiet title statute, combined with A.R.S. § 12-527, can bar all future challenges and confer full title to the holder after five years of unchallenged ownership and payment of property taxes.

Importantly, the Court emphasized that title under these statutes is conferred not by the deed itself, but by compliance with the statute—namely, possession of a recorded deed, a claim of ownership, and payment of taxes for five consecutive years.

Why It Matters to Probate, Trust, and Estate Litigation

For attorneys like us at Berk Law Group, who focus on probate, trust, and estate litigation, this case has significant implications:

  1. Heightened Vigilance for Deed Forgery in Estates: In the context of decedent estates, family members may discover suspicious conveyances of property only after death. This decision underscores the urgency of investigating and acting promptly. If more than five years have passed since a facially valid deed was recorded, the estate’s claims may be barred—even if the deed was forged.
  2. Impact on Fiduciary Duty Cases: If a personal representative, trustee, or agent under a power of attorney participates in or overlooks a forged conveyance and fails to pay property taxes on the property, their failure to act within the statutory period could cost the estate valuable property. That could give rise to breach of fiduciary duty claims against them.
  3. Intersection with Elder Abuse: The Court acknowledged the risk this rule poses to elderly and vulnerable individuals who may unknowingly be victims of deed fraud. In practice, this means we must be especially proactive in cases involving elder financial exploitation or suspicious property transfers.  The Court left it to the legislature to alter the statute to protect vulnerable adults, such as the protections under the Adult Protective Services Act.
  4. Use of Lis Pendens and Prompt Filing: As in this case, where a lis pendens was filed upon initiating the quiet title action, it’s critical to record notice as soon as litigation is filed to protect against further transfers and preserve rights.
  5. Room for Legislative Change: The concurring opinion flagged the risk of abuse under current law, suggesting the legislature may wish to amend § 12-524 to exclude forged deeds in the future. Until then, the Court has made clear that facial forgery is not enough to delay the five-year clock.

Next Steps for Litigants

While the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the statute of limitations bar, it remanded for consideration of equitable tolling and discovery rule arguments. This leaves open a narrow path for challenging forged deeds if the victim did not know or reasonably could not have known of the forgery.

Conclusion

The Dominguez decision is a wake-up call for anyone handling disputed property in probate or estate litigation. At Berk Law Group, we are experienced in addressing forged deeds, financial exploitation, and other title-related issues in estate matters. If you suspect fraud or need help untangling a family property dispute, contact us for a consultation.

The post Arizona Supreme Court Holds Forged Deed Can Trigger Quiet Title Statute of Limitation appeared first on Berk Law Group.