Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

What Recourse Does a Federal Grant Recipient Have If Its Grant Is Terminated?

By Aron C. Beezley & Nathaniel J. Greeson on April 28, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
What Recourse Does a Federal Grant Recipient Have If Its Grant Is Terminated?

Table of Contents

  • Understanding Federal Grant Termination
  • Step 1: Review the Terms of the Award
  • Step 2: Understand Your Appeal Rights
  • Step 3: Consider Contractual and Equitable Remedies
  • Step 4: File an Administrative or Judicial Challenge (If Available)
  • Step 5: Preserve Your Rights
  • Conclusion

When a federal agency terminates a grant award, the consequences can be severe for the recipient. Whether you’re a nonprofit, research institution, public entity, or otherwise, a sudden termination can disrupt operations, staff retention, and mission-critical projects. Fortunately, grant recipients do have legal recourse options when facing termination — provided they act quickly and understand their rights.

Link to Understanding Federal Grant Termination Understanding Federal Grant Termination

Federal grants are governed by a combination of statutory provisions, agency-specific regulations, and the terms of the grant agreement itself. Under the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) — codified at 2 C.F.R. Part 200 — federal awarding agencies may terminate awards in three main scenarios:

  1. For Cause – Due to the recipient’s material failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the award.
  2. With Consent – Mutually agreed upon by both the federal agency and the recipient.
  3. For Convenience – Unilaterally by the federal agency, typically for policy or funding reasons.

Each type of termination may afford different remedies and procedural protections for the grantee.

Link to Step 1: Review the Terms of the Award Step 1: Review the Terms of the Award

The first step is to review the Notice of Award (NOA) and any referenced regulations. These documents often specify what constitutes a breach, notice requirements for termination, and any rights to appeal or dispute the termination. Also, review the agency’s specific grant regulations (e.g., NIH, DOE, or NSF guidelines), which may add additional procedures.

Link to Step 2: Understand Your Appeal Rights Step 2: Understand Your Appeal Rights

If your grant is terminated for cause, you generally have the right to:

  • Receive written notice explaining the reasons for the termination.
  • Respond or submit a corrective action plan.
  • Request a hearing or appeal under the agency’s dispute resolution procedures.

Different agencies have different appeal mechanisms, so it is important to review and understand the relevant agency’s rules and regulations.   

Link to Step 3: Consider Contractual and Equitable Remedies Step 3: Consider Contractual and Equitable Remedies

Although grants are not traditional contracts, courts may apply some contract principles when interpreting grant disputes. For example:

  • If a grant is terminated in violation of the terms of the award or applicable regulations, the recipient may have a claim for breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
  • Some suits under the Tucker Act have been permitted in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims when the government allegedly breaches a funding obligation.
  • Equitable estoppel or reliance-based claims may be possible if the recipient made significant investments based on assurances from the agency.

However, federal sovereign immunity and grant-specific doctrines may limit the availability of monetary relief. 

Link to Step 4: File an Administrative or Judicial Challenge (If Available) Step 4: File an Administrative or Judicial Challenge (If Available)

If administrative appeals fail or are unavailable, the recipient may consider legal action. Options might include:

  • Agency-Specific Boards or ALJs – Some agencies permit formal administrative litigation before an administrative law judge.
  • Federal Court – In some cases, a recipient may be able to challenge termination in U.S. District Court, particularly if alleging violations of the Administrative Procedures Act or constitutional violations (e.g., due process or equal protection).
  • Court of Federal Claims – For certain claims seeking monetary damages, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims may have jurisdiction.

Link to Step 5: Preserve Your Rights Step 5: Preserve Your Rights

To maintain eligibility for future funding and preserve legal claims:

  • Document everything, including communications with the agency and any harm suffered.
  • Continue compliance with closeout requirements, including final reports and record retention.
  • Consult counsel early in the process to assess your legal options and preserve appeal deadlines.

Link to Conclusion Conclusion

Termination of a federal grant is a serious matter, but not necessarily the end of the road. Federal grant recipients have a range of procedural and substantive rights that can provide a path to appeal or challenge a termination decision. As always, early legal advice and thorough documentation are key to protecting your organization’s interests.

If you have any questions about the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact Aron Beezley or Nathaniel Greeson.

Photo of Aron C. Beezley Aron C. Beezley

Aron Beezley is the co-leader of Bradley’s nationally ranked Government Contracts Practice Group. Ranked nationally himself in Government Contracts Law by Chambers, Law360, Benchmark Litigation, and Super Lawyers, Aron’s vast experience includes representation of government contractors in numerous industries…

Aron Beezley is the co-leader of Bradley’s nationally ranked Government Contracts Practice Group. Ranked nationally himself in Government Contracts Law by Chambers, Law360, Benchmark Litigation, and Super Lawyers, Aron’s vast experience includes representation of government contractors in numerous industries and in all aspects of the government-contracting process, including negotiation, award, performance and termination.

Read more about Aron C. BeezleyEmailAron's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Nathaniel J. Greeson Nathaniel J. Greeson

Nathaniel Greeson helps clients solve government contracts challenges. Nathaniel represents clients in a range of government procurement issues, including bid protests, claims, disputes, audits and investigations. He has extensive experience with GAO bid protests, agency-level protests, Court of Federal Claims (COFC) bid protests…

Nathaniel Greeson helps clients solve government contracts challenges. Nathaniel represents clients in a range of government procurement issues, including bid protests, claims, disputes, audits and investigations. He has extensive experience with GAO bid protests, agency-level protests, Court of Federal Claims (COFC) bid protests, and SBA OHA size and NAICS appeals, as well as experience with agency-level requests for equitable adjustments (REA) and claims, and Boards of Contract Appeals claims. View articles by Nathaniel.

Read more about Nathaniel J. GreesonEmailNathaniel's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    BuildSmart
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo