Last year, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, alleging Global Circulation, Inc. (GCI) and its owner, Kenneth Redon III, violated the FTC Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and its associated Regulation F, § 521 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and the FTC’s Trade Regulation Rule on Impersonation of Government and Businesses. On May 1, the FTC announced the parties entered into a stipulated permanent injunction and money order, prohibiting GCI and Redon from any further debt collection activities.

The FTC’s amended complaint asserted 14 counts against the defendants for engaging in deceptive and abusive practices. Specifically, regulators alleged that the defendants, under their own name and several others, would contact consumers about debts they did not owe or GCI did not have authority to collect. These false debts were generally owed to small dollar or other specific lenders. In most cases the alleged debts were already paid in full or never sold as charged-off loans, and in some instances never existed at all. Because the named creditors were often consumers’ prior creditors, the consumers had reason to believe the defendants’ representations were legitimate. The FTC further contended that the defendants commonly failed to inform the consumers they were debt collectors attempting to collect a debt, threatened legal action with consequences such as garnishment, seizure of assets, arrest, or charges of bank fraud, called consumers multiple times a day, contacted family members repeatedly and asserted legal action was imminent, claimed they were affiliated with the creditors, possessed or claimed to possess private information, and failed to provide a notice with the amount of the debt, name of the creditor, and the required disclosures regarding the right to dispute. Defendants collected over $4.5 million from consumers using these tactics.

The FTC obtained a temporary restraining order in November 2024, shutting down the fraudulent debt collection scheme, and a receivership was put into place. Under the proposed stipulated order, the defendants are permanently banned from debt collection and debt brokering and the defendants and their officers, agents, employees, and attorneys are prohibited from misrepresenting any material fact related to the sale, promotion, or marketing of any good or service, making any false statements to obtain private information from consumers, or impersonating any business or person. The receivership will remain in place as a permanent receiver to liquidate all assets. A judgment of $9,684,338 will be entered in favor of the FTC, which will be suspended provided all financial holdings of both defendants from multiple banks and businesses are transferred to the receivership and certain transfers from Redon are made. However, the full judgment will become due if either defendant is found to have lied about their finances. Finally, the defendants are required to provide certain acknowledgements, reporting, and recordkeeping over the next twenty years.

Photo of Rachel Ommerman Rachel Ommerman

Rachel is an attorney in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services Practice Group, where she represents clients in consumer financial services law, collections disputes, and commercial litigation in both the federal and state courts. She also represents creditors in bankruptcy courts throughout the U.S.…

Rachel is an attorney in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services Practice Group, where she represents clients in consumer financial services law, collections disputes, and commercial litigation in both the federal and state courts. She also represents creditors in bankruptcy courts throughout the U.S., primarily Motions of Relief from Stay and Objections to Confirmation, as well as handling adversary proceedings.

Photo of Virginia Bell Flynn Virginia Bell Flynn

Virginia is a partner in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services practice and specifically within the Financial Services Litigation practice. She represents clients in federal and state court, both at the trial and appellate level in the areas of complex litigation and business disputes…

Virginia is a partner in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services practice and specifically within the Financial Services Litigation practice. She represents clients in federal and state court, both at the trial and appellate level in the areas of complex litigation and business disputes, health care litigation, including ERISA and out-of-network issues, and consumer litigation in over 21 states nationwide. As a result of new legal developments, she increasingly counsels clients to ensure they comply with the myriad of growing laws in the consumer law with a particular emphasis on the intersection of TCPA and HIPAA.