Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Understanding the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Bid Protest Procedures

By Aron C. Beezley, Nathaniel J. Greeson & Charles F. Blanchard on June 3, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Understanding the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Bid Protest Procedures

Table of Contents

  • Filing a Protest: Strict Methods of Delivery
  • Timing Is Everything: Deadlines for Submission
  • 1. Protests Based on Solicitation Terms
  • 2. Protests Based on Evaluation or Award
  • Protest Requirements: Content Matters
  • Protest Bonds
  • Decision Timeline and Review Process
  • Appealing a Protest Decision
  • Contract Awards During a Protest
  • Conclusion

When participating in a government procurement process, understanding the rules governing bid protests is crucial. For contractors engaging with the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA), strict procedural guidelines must be followed to challenge a solicitation, evaluation, or contract award. Here’s what you need to know about filing a bid protest with MWAA.

Link to Filing a Protest: Strict Methods of Delivery Filing a Protest: Strict Methods of Delivery

All bid protests must be formally addressed to the vice president of the Office of Supply Chain Management (OSCM). Importantly, MWAA generally does not accept electronic submissions. Protests must be delivered using one of the following methods:

  • Registered or certified mail with return receipt requested
  • Nationally recognized delivery service (with tracking showing date sent and received)
  • Hand delivery to the MWAA Procurement and Contracts Department

Any protest sent via email or other electronic means may be rejected.

Link to Timing Is Everything: Deadlines for Submission Timing Is Everything: Deadlines for Submission

MWAA distinguishes between two types of protests, each with its own deadline:

Link to 1. Protests Based on Solicitation Terms 1. Protests Based on Solicitation Terms

If the protest is based on the contents or omissions in a solicitation or an amendment:

  • The protest must be received within 14 days of either the solicitation issuance date or the date of the relevant amendment, whichever is earlier.
  • Alternatively, if the offer submission deadline falls earlier, the protest must be filed before that deadline.

Link to 2. Protests Based on Evaluation or Award 2. Protests Based on Evaluation or Award

If the protest challenges how offers were evaluated or awarded:

  • Only offerors who actually submitted a proposal may file.
  • The protest must be received within seven days after the offeror knew — or should have known — the basis for the protest.

Offerors are deemed to have knowledge of a potential basis for protest on the earliest of the following:

  • Public bid opening
  • Receipt of a notice of unsuccessful offer
  • Recommendation of the contract for board approval
  • Public posting of the contract award

Link to Protest Requirements: Content Matters Protest Requirements: Content Matters

To be considered, a protest must include:

  • Protester’s name,address, phone number, and email
  • The solicitation number
  • A demonstration of the protester’s legitimate interest in the procurement
  • A detailed basis for the protest, with specific allegations and references to errors or legal violations
  • Evidence that the protest is timely
  • The signature of a person authorized to file on behalf of the protester

Importantly, preemptive protests — those filed speculatively before a basis is confirmed — may be denied outright.

Link to Protest Bonds Protest Bonds

In certain solicitations, MWAA may require a protest bond to deter frivolous protests. If a bond is required, this will be clearly stated in the solicitation, along with bond amount and format. Failing to submit the required bond will generally result in automatic rejection of the protest, regardless of its merits.

Link to Decision Timeline and Review Process Decision Timeline and Review Process

MWAA strives to handle protests efficiently:

  • The vice president, OSCM will attempt to respond within seven business days of receipt.
  • If additional time is needed, the protester will be notified within the same seven-day window.
  • Only substantiated allegations will be reviewed. Vague or unsupported protests will be denied.

Link to Appealing a Protest Decision Appealing a Protest Decision

If unsatisfied with the vice president’s decision, the protester may appeal:

  • To the CEO – within seven days of the OSCM decision letter
  • To the board – if the contract required board approval, an additional appeal may be made within seven days of the CEO’s decision

For contracts not requiring board approval, the CEO’s decision is final.

Link to Contract Awards During a Protest Contract Awards During a Protest

If a protest is filed before contract award, MWAA will not proceed with award or issue a notice to proceed while the protest is pending — unless the CEO determines that moving forward is in the MWAA’s best interest.

Link to Conclusion Conclusion

Navigating the MWAA’s bid protest process demands strict compliance with procedural and timing requirements. Contractors must act quickly, follow detailed filing instructions, and ensure their protest is fully supported. Understanding these rules can make the difference between a timely, considered protest and one that is dismissed without review.

If you need assistance with a MWAA bid protest or have any questions about the foregoing, please feel free to contact Aron Beezley, Nathaniel Greeson, or Charlie Blanchard.

Photo of Aron C. Beezley Aron C. Beezley

Aron Beezley is the co-leader of Bradley’s nationally ranked Government Contracts Practice Group. Ranked nationally himself in Government Contracts Law by Chambers, Law360, Benchmark Litigation, and Super Lawyers, Aron’s vast experience includes representation of government contractors in numerous industries…

Aron Beezley is the co-leader of Bradley’s nationally ranked Government Contracts Practice Group. Ranked nationally himself in Government Contracts Law by Chambers, Law360, Benchmark Litigation, and Super Lawyers, Aron’s vast experience includes representation of government contractors in numerous industries and in all aspects of the government-contracting process, including negotiation, award, performance and termination.

Read more about Aron C. BeezleyEmailAron's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Nathaniel J. Greeson Nathaniel J. Greeson

Nathaniel Greeson helps clients solve government contracts challenges. Nathaniel represents clients in a range of government procurement issues, including bid protests, claims, disputes, audits and investigations. He has extensive experience with GAO bid protests, agency-level protests, Court of Federal Claims (COFC) bid protests…

Nathaniel Greeson helps clients solve government contracts challenges. Nathaniel represents clients in a range of government procurement issues, including bid protests, claims, disputes, audits and investigations. He has extensive experience with GAO bid protests, agency-level protests, Court of Federal Claims (COFC) bid protests, and SBA OHA size and NAICS appeals, as well as experience with agency-level requests for equitable adjustments (REA) and claims, and Boards of Contract Appeals claims. View articles by Nathaniel.

Read more about Nathaniel J. GreesonEmailNathaniel's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Charles F. Blanchard Charles F. Blanchard

Charlie Blanchard focuses his practice on government contract law, construction litigation, and alternative dispute resolution. He litigates construction disputes for general contractors, subcontractors, and owners for public and private projects. He also represents clients in pre- and post-award bid protests and procurement regulatory…

Charlie Blanchard focuses his practice on government contract law, construction litigation, and alternative dispute resolution. He litigates construction disputes for general contractors, subcontractors, and owners for public and private projects. He also represents clients in pre- and post-award bid protests and procurement regulatory compliance. He drafts substantive motions, protests, discovery, and briefs before the Boards of Contract Appeals, Court of Federal Claims, GAO, federal district courts, and state courts, including the Virginia Supreme Court. Before joining Bradley, Charlie was a construction litigation and government contracts attorney at another nationally recognized construction firm.

Read more about Charles F. BlanchardEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government Contracts
  • Blog:
    BuildSmart
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo