Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

FAR Reform in Progress: Breaking Down the Latest Proposed Revisions

By Cherylyn Harley LeBon, Anam Abid & James A. Sabia on June 23, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Online digital document inspection or assessment evaluation on laptop computer, contract review, analysis, inspection of agreement contract, compliance verification. Vector illustration

The FAR Council has been rolling out piecemeal revisions to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) as directed by executive order “Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement.” For background on the broader goals and implications of this reform effort, see our earlier post, “Understanding the Overhaul of Federal Procurement Regulations.”

To date, the FAR Council has promulgated proposed revisions to Parts 1, 10, 11, 18, 34, 39, 43, and 52 of the FAR. While these revisions are subject to traditional notice-and-comment procedures, federal agencies are using reasonable efforts to implement the FAR Council’s proposed changes before they are finalized. Below is a summary of the proposed revisions that federal contractors should be watching.

What’s Already Changed: Key FAR Revisions to Parts 1, 34, and 52

For a breakdown of the earlier updates issued under the same executive order, read our previous client alert, “The Revolutionary FAR Overhaul: What Federal Contractors Need to Know.”

What’s New: Proposed FAR Revisions Federal Contractors Should Know

Part 10: Market Research

  • Provides federal agencies with more flexibility in market research methods at all dollar thresholds.
  • Retains the requirement that federal agencies conduct market research for all acquisitions, task orders, and delivery orders with an estimated value exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold.
    • Removes the requirement that federal agencies conduct market research for acquisitions with an estimated value below the simplified acquisition threshold when adequate pricing information is unavailable.
  • Removes suggested procedures for federal agencies conducting market research.
  • FAR 52.210-1, “Market Research,” shall be included in solicitations and contracts for noncommercial acquisitions over $6 million.

Part 11: Describing Agency Needs

  • Removes the directive that federal agencies promote sustainable acquisitions as outlined in the Green Procurement Compilation (GPC).
  • Federal agencies may consider commercial market acceptance as the sole criterion when assessing whether an item meets its requirements.
  • Removes provisions governing the identification and availability of specifications.
  • Removes provisions for establishing delivery or performance schedules, as well as the factors federal agencies should consider when establishing such schedules.
  • Retains the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) for acquisitions supporting national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy programs.

Part 18: Emergency Acquisitions

  • Federal agencies are no longer encouraged to procure sustainable products and services when those services are intended for emergency acquisitions.
  • Retains emergency acquisition flexibilities for contingency operations, cyber, nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological attacks, international disaster assistance, and other major disasters.

Part 39: Acquisition of Information and Communication Technology

  • Removes the requirement that contracting officers must consider the appropriate contract vehicle for every award of every subsequent increment of a modular Information Technology contract.
  • The upcoming changes to this Part will indicate that federal agencies are no longer required to request that IT contractors to describe the minimum experience or educational requirements for proposed contractor personnel.

Part 43: Contract Modifications

  • Clarifies the process for documenting and defining change orders—for example, a contracting officer will no longer provide a list of significant contract events when the contracting officer requires a field pricing review of requests for equitable adjustment.

Conclusion

These proposed revisions signal a continued shift in federal procurement priorities under the “Restoring Common Sense” Executive Order. Although not yet finalized, agencies are already moving to implement the changes, and contractors should take note. Staying current on the evolving FAR landscape is essential to remain competitive, compliant, and well-positioned for upcoming opportunities.

Photo of Cherylyn Harley LeBon Cherylyn Harley LeBon

Co-Chair of Cohen Seglias’ Government Contracting Group, Cherylyn is an attorney and strategic advisor with more than 25 years of leadership experience in Washington, DC and internationally. She focuses her practice on government contracts and corporate matters, guiding clients through complex regulatory landscapes…

Co-Chair of Cohen Seglias’ Government Contracting Group, Cherylyn is an attorney and strategic advisor with more than 25 years of leadership experience in Washington, DC and internationally. She focuses her practice on government contracts and corporate matters, guiding clients through complex regulatory landscapes and business challenges.

Read more about Cherylyn Harley LeBonEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Anam Abid Anam Abid

Anam serves the firm’s clients in a wide variety of federal contracting matters, including bid protests, preparing Requests for Equitable Adjustment (REAs), responding to government investigations, and all stages of litigating claims under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA).

Read more about Anam AbidEmailAnam's Linkedin Profile
Photo of James A. Sabia James A. Sabia

James serves the firm’s clients in a wide variety of federal contracting matters, including bid protests, preparing Requests for Equitable Adjustment (REAs), responding to government investigations, and all stages of litigating claims under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA).

Read more about James A. SabiaEmail
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    Federal Construction Contracting Blog
  • Organization:
    Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo