Inaccurate Instructions and Interest on the Verdict: Takeaways from Johnson v. Advocate For the Medical Negligence Professional By LaDonna L. Boeckman & Chelsea L. Caldwell on July 31, 2025 Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn Analyzes Illinois appellate decision in Johnson v. Advocate, which impacts medical malpractice defense on jury instructions and sole proximate cause, as well as high-low proposals under the state’s prejudgment interest statute.