Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FTC Updates (July 14 – 25, 2025)

By Joanna Rosen Forster & Isabella Ordorica on August 1, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Federal Trade Commission
The building of the Federal Trade Commission in downtown Washington DC.

In the heat of summer, the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection curbed deceptive weight-loss claims by sellers of GLP-1s, as well as debt relief scams and secret mobile data collection. The FTC also reopened and set aside a final consent order regarding Exxon Mobil’s board and management following its acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources. These stories and more, after the jump.

Monday, July 14, 2025

Bureau of Consumer Protection; Health; Weight Loss; Advertising and Marketing; Endorsements, Influencers, and Reviews

  • As we previously reported in our client alert, the FTC announced a $150,000 settlement with operators of the telemedicine company Southern Health Solutions, Inc., doing business as Next Medical and NextMed, settling charges that the company used deceptive cost and weight loss claims as well as fake reviews and testimonials to lure customers into buying their weight-loss membership programs. In its complaint, the FTC alleged the company sold monthly membership programs without adequately disclosing important terms and conditions, such as the additional costs of medications or necessary medical visits and early membership-termination fees. The FTC also alleged the company falsified positive reviews, utilizing testimonials and photos from people who were not clients, and the company suppressed negative reviews by selectively challenging critical reviews and offering monetary incentives to customers in exchange for removing negative reviews. In addition to the monetary settlement, which is expected to fund consumer refunds, the proposed consent order prohibits the company from misrepresenting its services, weight-loss claims or terms and conditions, and manipulating its reviews.

Thursday, July 17, 2025

Bureau of Competition; Merger; Interlocking Directorates

  • The FTC reopened and set aside a January 2025 consent order following a petition by the founder and former CEO of Pioneer Natural Resources, a company recently acquired by Exxon Mobile Corporation. The consent order prohibited Exxon from nominating, designating, or appointing the founder, Scott Sheffield, to the Exxon board of directors or from allowing Mr. Sheffield to serve in an advisory capacity to Exxon’s board or management. Additionally, Exxon was prohibited from nominating, designating, or appointing certain Pioneer employees or directors to the Exxon board for a period of five years. The Commission initially denied the founder and former CEO’s petition for lack of standing on July 15, 2025, but revisited the petition pursuant to its authority under the FTC’s Rules of Practice Rule 3.72. The initial complaint alleged that Mr. Sheffield sought to coordinate output levels with other crude oil producers and alleged any board appointment would create an unlawful interlocking directorate. After a period of public comment and review, the FTC found that vacating the final order is in the public interest because the initial complaint disregarded both the FTC’s Merger Guidelines and related precedent, and also failed to allege an antitrust violation.

Friday, July 18, 2025

Bureau of Consumer Protection; Mobile; Privacy and Security; Consumer Privacy; Data Security

  • In response to a petition by the CEO of Support King, LLC (d/b/a SpyFone.com), Scott Zuckerman, the FTC is seeking public comment on a petition to vacate or modify an order banning Support King and Mr. Zuckerman from offering, promoting, selling, or advertising any surveillance app, service, or business by August 19, 2025. The order followed a 2021 FTC complaint that alleged Support King and Zuckerman sold apps that allowed purchasers to secretly monitor devices without device-owner knowledge, thereby secretly collecting and sharing data on photos, text messages, web histories, location, and physical movements. In the petition, Mr. Zuckerman asserts that Support King is permanently closed and claims that the FTC’s order imposed an “excessive and unnecessary burden” on him personally and has prevented him from expanding his other restaurant and “tourism” businesses that remain subject to the order.

Monday, July 21, 2025

Bureau of Consumer Protection; Debt Relief; Credit and Loans

  • In a 3-0 decision, the FTC voted to bring an action against several companies and individuals that allegedly operated an “Accelerated Debt” relief program, primarily targeting seniors and veterans. The FTC alleges, among other things, that defendants directly solicited consumers with false promises of debt relief and impersonated consumers’ banks or credit card issuers or the federal government. On Monday, July 21, 2025, an Arizona district court issued a temporary restraining order against defendants, asset freeze, appointment of a receiver, an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue, and other equitable relief.

Thursday, July 24, 2025

Bureau of Consumer Protection; Consumer Refunds; Debt Relief

  • The FTC is sending checks to consumers harmed by a fake student loan forgiveness program. Defendant businesses and their owners were charged for luring students with a non-existent relief program while falsely claiming affiliation with the U.S. Department of Education and charging illegal junk fees. A settlement was announced in October 2023 ordering individual defendants to surrender their assets and permanently cease offering any kind of debt relief.

 Bureau of Competition; Prescription Drugs

  • On Thursday, July 24, 2025, the FTC, Department of Commerce, DOJ Antitrust Division and the Department of Health and Human services jointly held a listening session regarding affordability of prescription drugs.  This session was the second in a series dedicated to strategies for making prescription drugs more affordable by promoting competition. This session focused on formulary and benefit practices and regulatory abuse.
Photo of Joanna Rosen Forster Joanna Rosen Forster

Joanna Forster’s multifaceted background positions her to effectively manage conflicts across the legal spectrum and across the globe. In her prior roles as general counsel (representing both plaintiffs and defendants) and as government prosecutor/enforcer, Joanna handled nearly every type of matter, ranging from

…

Joanna Forster’s multifaceted background positions her to effectively manage conflicts across the legal spectrum and across the globe. In her prior roles as general counsel (representing both plaintiffs and defendants) and as government prosecutor/enforcer, Joanna handled nearly every type of matter, ranging from complex commercial and white collar matters in areas such as employment, intellectual property, securities and antitrust law, to internal investigations and corporate and M&A transactions. She views her role as both a conflict manager, dispensing advice to avoid adversarial action, and as a tech and business litigator, resolving disputes with her client’s business goals in mind.

Having served as the general counsel and compliance officer of a publicly traded ecommerce platform operating in over 60 countries, Joanna has an appreciation of strategic dispute resolution, investigations, and compliance from a general counsel’s perspective. By understanding how business leaders combine the input of in-house and outside counsel to make decisions, Joanna is able to provide her clients with decisive and efficient legal guidance.

Her practice includes litigating domestic and cross-border complex commercial disputes and advising technology and ecommerce companies on matters related to internet platforms, product launches, market campaigns, and new vertical lines of business, all while advising on foreign and domestic laws that regulate online content, physical products, and the companies that bring them to market. Drawing on her experience as the General Counsel of an online e-commerce marketplace, Joanna also regularly advises and counsels clients on California’s Proposition 65, from prevention and compliance to remediation. Joanna is well-versed in key regulations that impact ecommerce companies, including the EU’s Digital Services Act, the U.S. INFORM Act, and the proposed SHOP SAFE Act, as well as laws and regulations that govern online speech such as the Communications Decency Act, Section 230.

Prior to going in-house, Joanna was the deputy attorney general, Corporate Fraud Section of the California Department of Justice. In this capacity, she led large, complex civil matters alleging violations of California’s False Claims Act, Securities Law, Section 17200, Cartwright Act, and other deceptive business practices. She also maintained her own investigations and litigation docket.

Before joining the California Department of Justice, Joanna spent nearly a decade in private practice, where she focused on civil and criminal antitrust and commercial litigation. She also served as a law clerk for the Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall in the U.S. District Court for the Central District Court of California.

Read more about Joanna Rosen ForsterEmailJoanna's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Isabella Ordorica Isabella Ordorica
Read more about Isabella OrdoricaEmail
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo