Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The Keep Call Centers in America Act of 2025: What Financial Services Companies Need to Know

By Josh Lewis & Robin-Renee Keys on August 13, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
The Keep Call Centers in America Act of 2025: What Financial Services Companies Need to Know

Table of Contents

  • Key Provisions
  • Impact on Financial Services Businesses
  • Practical Steps for Financial Institutions
  • Final Thoughts

On July 29, 2025, Sens. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) and Jim Justice (R-WV) introduced the Keep Call Centers in America Act of 2025. The act targets the offshoring of call center operations, imposes new disclosure rules for customer service interactions, and ties federal funding eligibility to domestic operations. Oversight of foreign call centers is not a new concept for financial institutions, as regulators have issued guidance on the topic since the early 2000s. For financial services providers, where customer service and compliance are already tightly regulated, the act will have significant operational and strategic implications. Banks, credit unions, mortgage servicers, and fintech companies that currently rely on offshore call centers will need to prepare for the compliance burdens and operational adjustments the legislation requires.

Link to Key Provisions Key Provisions

1. Applicability

For purposes of the act, the term “employer” refers to any business enterprise that operates a call center and either employs 50 or more individuals (not counting part-time employees) or employs 50 or more individuals who, collectively, work at least 1,500 hours per week (excluding overtime). A “part-time employee” is defined as any employee who works an average of fewer than 20 hours per week or who has been employed for fewer than six of the 12 months preceding the date on which notice is required under the act.

2. Public List of Employers with Offshore Call Centers

The act directs the secretary of labor to create and maintain a publicly available list of employers that relocate a call center overseas or outsource at least 30% of a call center’s work to a foreign provider. Employers must give the secretary of labor at least 120 days’ advance notice before such relocation or outsourcing, and noncompliance can trigger civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day. Once an employer is added to the list, it remains on the list for up to five years unless it brings the work back to the United States and meets specific staffing requirements. For financial institutions, this listing could impact both public perception and eligibility for federal support. The act does not include directions for employers that are already utilizing offshore call centers.

Removal from the List

The secretary of labor must remove an employer from the list if certain conditions are met. Specifically, an employer will be removed if it has relocated a call center from outside the United States to a domestic location and the new call center employs as many or more workers than the overseas center it replaced. Alternatively, an employer that previously outsourced call center work may also be removed from the list if it amends its contract to require that all call center work be performed within the United States.

3. Federal Funding Restrictions

Appearing on the public list has immediate financial consequences. Companies on the list become ineligible for federal grants or guaranteed loans for a period of five years. If a company with an existing federal award is later added to the list, it must pay monthly penalties equal to 8.3% of the total award and may see the award canceled after a year if it remains listed. Although waivers may be granted in limited cases involving national security, significant U.S. job loss, or environmental harm, waivers will be the exception rather than the rule. The law also requires agencies (a federal or state executive agency or a military department) to give contracting preference to employers not appearing on the public list, and mandates that any call center work performed under a federal contract be conducted entirely within the United States.

4. Mandatory Customer Service Disclosures

One year after enactment, the act will require businesses engaged in customer service communications to disclose the physical location of their customer service agents at the start of each interaction. If the agent is outside the United States, the customer must be informed of their right to request an immediate transfer to a U.S.-based agent. Businesses that use artificial intelligence (AI) for customer service must also disclose its use at the outset and offer a transfer to a human agent located domestically. These obligations apply regardless of whether the customer service is performed in-house or by a third-party vendor. Financial institutions will therefore need to adjust scripts, technology platforms, and operational workflows to comply. Annual certification of compliance to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will be required, and violations will be treated as unfair or deceptive acts under the FTC Act.

There are several exceptions to the disclosure requirements regarding the location of customer service agents. First, the requirements do not apply when all employees or agents participating in the customer service communication are physically located within the United States. Second, the requirements are waived if a consumer knowingly initiates contact with a foreign business or address, and the consumer is aware, or reasonably should be aware, that the representative is located outside the United States. Third, communications related to emergency services are exempt. Finally, the FTC has the authority to exclude certain business entities or types of customer service communications from these requirements if exceptionally compelling circumstances justify the exclusion.

Link to Impact on Financial Services Businesses Impact on Financial Services Businesses

For financial services companies, the act presents a multifaceted compliance and operational challenge. Institutions will need to conduct a full audit of their call center arrangements, both domestic and international, and review all vendor agreements to ensure offshore providers follow the required notice, disclosure, and transfer protocols. They will also need to evaluate their exposure to federal grants, guarantees, and contracts, as offshore call center operations could jeopardize critical funding sources. Beyond the regulatory consequences, the public nature of the public list means that customer and investor perception could be at stake, potentially affecting brand reputation in a sector where trust and service quality are paramount.

1. Compliance Complexity

Banks, credit unions, mortgage servicers, and fintech companies often rely on offshore call centers for cost efficiency. The act’s notification, certification, and disclosure requirements introduce new compliance layers — with the FTC, Department of Labor, and contracting agencies all involved.

2. Funding & Contracting Risks

For institutions that receive federal loan guarantees, grants, or contracts (e.g., Community Development Financial Institutions, SBA lenders, or Ginnie Mae issuers), offshore call center operations could jeopardize eligibility. Even temporary outsourcing could trigger multi-year ineligibility.

3. Technology & Vendor Management

The disclosure mandates extend to third-party vendors. Financial institutions will need to:

  • Review vendor contracts to ensure compliance.
  • Implement call routing that enables immediate transfer to U.S.-based staff.
  • Incorporate AI usage disclosures into scripts and systems.

4. Reputational Considerations

The public list could influence consumer perception. For financial brands that rely heavily on trust, appearing on this list might have marketing and customer loyalty consequences beyond the regulatory penalties.

Link to Practical Steps for Financial Institutions Practical Steps for Financial Institutions

  • Audit Call Center Footprint – Map all in-house and outsourced call center operations, including virtual agents.
  • Review Federal Funding Exposure – Identify current or anticipated grants, guarantees, or contracts that could be at risk.
  • Revise Vendor Contracts – Add provisions requiring advance notice of any offshore relocation and compliance with disclosure requirements.
  • Plan for Disclosure Protocols – Update scripts, CRM systems, and AI interfaces to meet location and AI-use disclosure rules.
  • Engage Compliance Early – Coordinate across compliance, legal, IT, and operations to avoid penalties and protect eligibility for federal programs.

Link to Final Thoughts Final Thoughts

The Keep Call Centers in America Act of 2025 reflects a broader federal policy shift toward linking access to federal benefits with domestic job retention and operational transparency. For financial services businesses, its provisions go beyond symbolic support for U.S.-based employment; they create real compliance, funding, and reputational considerations. Now is the time for institutions to engage legal, compliance, IT, and operations teams to assess current practices, update procedures, and ensure that all customer service operations, whether internal or outsourced, are aligned with the requirements of this new legislation.

Bradley’s Banking & Financial Services team will continue to monitor the progression of the act to answer questions and assist industry participants in meeting their compliance requirements.

Photo of Josh Lewis Josh Lewis

Josh Lewis is a member of the Banking & Financial Services Practice Group.

Read more about Josh LewisEmail
Photo of Robin-Renee Keys Robin-Renee Keys

Robin-Renee Keys is an associate in Bradley’s Banking and Financial Services Practice Group. Robin-Renee’s practice is focused on helping financial services clients navigate the regulatory and compliance issues most critical to their business. Robin-Renee’s compliance experience encompasses issues arising under the Fair Credit…

Robin-Renee Keys is an associate in Bradley’s Banking and Financial Services Practice Group. Robin-Renee’s practice is focused on helping financial services clients navigate the regulatory and compliance issues most critical to their business. Robin-Renee’s compliance experience encompasses issues arising under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Truth in Lending Act (TILA), and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), including the many regulations interpreting those statutes. She analyzes and advises on regulations issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and other regulatory bodies.

Read more about Robin-Renee KeysEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Financial Services Perspectives
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo