The US Department of Justice’s (DOJ) new Data Security Program (DSP), designed to protect sensitive information and national security-related data from misuse by foreign actors, took full effect on October 6, 2025. The program introduces new restrictions on how companies handle and share sensitive US personal data and government-related data, especially when certain foreign entities are involved. With enforcement underway, companies should understand who is covered, what activities are restricted, and what compliance measures are required. Failure to comply with the rules can result in civil or criminal penalties.

Link to Who Must Comply Who Must Comply

The DSP applies broadly to US companies, citizens, or organizations that collect, store, or transfer bulk US sensitive personal or government-related data. The program also applies to entities handling US data or engaging in transactions with US persons that could expose this data to foreign persons or governments. The definitions of sensitive data and government-related data are expansive under the rule and include bulk sensitive data that is anonymized, pseudonymized, de-identified, or encrypted, leading to more transactions being covered than companies would otherwise expect under other US data privacy laws. Additionally, activities not typically viewed as involving the sale or transfer of data may nonetheless fall within the DSP’s restrictions. For example, a US company that operates a website or mobile application may trigger these rules if it knowingly installs or approves advertising technologies—such as tracking pixels or software development kits—that enable the transfer of data to third parties.

Link to Which Foreign Countries and Persons Are Covered Which Foreign Countries and Persons Are Covered

The rule restricts or prohibits transactions involving “countries of concern” and persons or entities controlled by them. As of now, these countries are China (including Hong Kong and Macau), Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela. The DOJ may also designate “covered persons” as a foreign entity, owner, or individual found to be owned, directed by, or acting on behalf of a country of concern. This flexibility allows the DOJ to expand coverage as national security evolves.

Link to What Transactions Are Prohibited vs. Restricted What Transactions Are Prohibited vs. Restricted

The new rules identify two main categories of data-related transactions:

  • Prohibited Transactions: Unless an exception applies, transfers of US sensitive personal data or government related-data pursuant to a data brokerage agreement with countries of concern or covered persons are prohibited.
  • Restricted Transactions: Other covered transfers via vendor agreements, employment agreements, or investment agreements may proceed only if specific security measures, contractual safeguards, and recordkeeping requirements are met. 

Link to What Obligations Companies Now Have for Restricted Transactions What Obligations Companies Now Have for Restricted Transactions

  • Due Diligence Requirements: Companies must develop and implement a data compliance program that includes risk-based procedures to verify and document the flow, parties, and end use of any sensitive or government-related data. The program must include written, annually certified policies describing compliance and security measures, vendor verification processes, and any additional information required by the attorney general.  
  • Audit Requirements: Companies must conduct an annual, independent audit to ensure that compliance is working as intended. The audit should examine a range of activities, such as data practices, security safeguards, and recordkeeping. The final report must be retained for 10 years. 
  • Records and Recordkeeping Requirements: Companies must keep complete, accurate records of all restricted transactions for at least 10 years. This includes maintaining written compliance and security policies, audit results, due diligence documentation, and any licenses or agreements related to restricted transactions. A company officer must certify such records’ accuracy and completeness annually.
  • Reporting Requirements: The DOJ may request reports or supporting documents at any time. Companies involved in restricted cloud-based transactions must file annual reports summarizing the previous year’s activities. Finally, if a company receives and rejects a prohibited data-brokerage transaction, it must report such transaction to the DOJ within 14 days.
  • Security Requirements: The DOJ incorporated the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency cybersecurity standards for restricted transactions to protect sensitive or government-related data. 

Link to Whistleblower Program Whistleblower Program

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network established a whistleblower program with incentives for individuals reporting violations of the DSP. Individuals located in the US or abroad who provide information about violations of the DSP may be eligible for awards if the information they provide leads to a successful enforcement action by the DOJ that results in monetary penalties exceeding $1 million.

Organizations should review their current data practices, contracts, and vendor relationships to ensure compliance with the new rule. Our team can help evaluate your exposure, design compliance programs, and guide implementation under the DOJ’s framework. For more information, please contact the authors or any member of the McCarter & English Cybersecurity & Data Privacy team.

*Donnie Oliver, a law clerk at McCarter not yet admitted to the bar, contributed to this alert.

Photo of Erin Prest Erin Prest

Erin Prest is co-leader of the Cybersecurity & Data Privacy group. A former Privacy & Civil Liberties Officer and Deputy General Counsel at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Erin’s deep experience lies at the intersection of federal privacy law and data security…

Erin Prest is co-leader of the Cybersecurity & Data Privacy group. A former Privacy & Civil Liberties Officer and Deputy General Counsel at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Erin’s deep experience lies at the intersection of federal privacy law and data security strategy. She provides counseling and business strategies regarding data privacy, incident response planning, and the evaluation of new enterprise technologies at all stages of the information lifecycle. She advises clients on data breaches, collection and use of sensitive information such as biometric data and commercially available information, and artificial intelligence.

Known for her practical approach to finding custom-tailored solutions using privacy by design, Erin helps clients confronted with data breaches, ransomware attacks, or other pressing or high-stakes data privacy issues. Her experience with data privacy analysis includes crafting bespoke solutions for keeping data safe and protecting privacy. She excels at the analysis of programs and their data in order to provide proactive counseling regarding potential risks and ways to mitigate them. Erin provides end-to-end data privacy counsel and analysis.

Erin served as one of three executives overseeing the implementation of artificial intelligence and governance at the FBI. In this role, she worked with tech personnel, executives, and all levels of personnel across the federal government to help shape and craft the governance process in order to implement meaningful but practical solutions. Erin provides practical, hands-on experience for clients who are evaluating use of and developing program management of artificial intelligence while maximizing its potential.

In her 18 years at the FBI, Erin supervised approximately 100 attorneys, special agents, paralegals, and professional staff handling all legal matters related to investigative and administrative law—from regulatory creation and compliance to operational legal advice. She also oversaw the legal guidance related to criminal investigative activities, crisis response, procurement, criminal history information, and DNA matters among others.

Erin earned her JD from Case Western Reserve School of Law and BA from the University of Michigan. After law school, she entered the government as a counterterrorism analyst through the Presidential Management Fellows Program and served as a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

Photo of Zachary Myers Zachary Myers

Appointed US Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana in 2021, Zach spent fourteen years at the Department of Justice (DOJ) before joining McCarter. His public service includes more than a decade as an Assistant US Attorney both in the District of Maryland…

Appointed US Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana in 2021, Zach spent fourteen years at the Department of Justice (DOJ) before joining McCarter. His public service includes more than a decade as an Assistant US Attorney both in the District of Maryland and the Southern District of Indiana where he led investigations, prosecutions, and appeals of a wide range of federal offenses, with a focus on cyber and technology-facilitated crimes.

An experienced trial lawyer and investigator, Zach advises clients across industries on a wide range of complex civil and criminal disputes. He also conducts internal investigations and helps clients navigate investigations brought by government regulators and state and federal prosecutors. Zach has extensive cybersecurity experience and is the co-leader of McCarter’s Cybersecurity & Data Privacy group. He works with clients to identify risks, implement and evaluate security programs, and respond to cyber incidents, including data breaches and ransomware attacks.

As US Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, Zach crafted and implemented the office’s strategic plan, which focused on addressing gun violence, disrupting drug trafficking, protecting and promoting civil rights, and prosecution of complex crimes including, cybercrime, economic crimes, public corruption, human trafficking, and child exploitation. During his tenure as US Attorney, he served as chair of the Attorney General’s Advisory Subcommittee on Cyber and Intellectual Property and as a member of various committees and working groups developing policy and addressing issues relating to cybercrime and technology. Zach was instrumental in developing the DOJ’s comprehensive cyber strategy and policies related to artificial intelligence. He worked closely with the DOJ’s National Security Division, Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, and Fraud Section, as well as the DOJ’s Office of International Affairs and the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation to obtain evidence overseas, extradite defendants for prosecution in the United States, and facilitate European prosecutions.

As an Assistant US Attorney for the District of Maryland, Zach helped to create the office’s National Security & Cybercrime Section and served as the office’s first Cybercrime Counsel, a role in which he worked closely with law enforcement agencies and the US intelligence community to investigate transnational cybercrimes and handle national security matters including espionage, digital currency crimes, and computer hacking.

Alexis Martinez

Alexis Martinez advises businesses on compliance with various state and federal data privacy and cybersecurity laws. She also assists clients with internal governance, risks assessments, and data breach mitigation and response.

Alexis previously served as a law clerk in the Data Privacy &…

Alexis Martinez advises businesses on compliance with various state and federal data privacy and cybersecurity laws. She also assists clients with internal governance, risks assessments, and data breach mitigation and response.

Alexis previously served as a law clerk in the Data Privacy & Identity Theft Unit of the Office of the Indiana Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division. She holds a master’s degree in Cybersecurity Risk Management and, as part of her capstone project, worked closely with the Indiana Executive Council on Cybersecurity to advise on current literature for cybersecurity best practices in municipal government. Alexis serves as a KnowledgeNet Chair for the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) Indiana KnowledgeNet Chapter and is responsible for coordinating networking events and educational meetings which offer CPE credit. Alexis obtained the CIPP/US certification from the IAPP demonstrating a strong understanding in US privacy laws and regulations, as well as an understanding of the legal requirements for the responsible transfer of personal data to and from the US.