Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Student presentation examining payroll challenges for cannabis-related businesses in an all-cash industry

By Douglas Berman on February 26, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As long-time readers (and my students) know, when I teach my Marijuana Law and Policy seminar at The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, the closing weeks of the class are devoted to student presentations on the research topics of their choice. And part of the assignment requires these students to provide a brief summary and some background reading for their classmates about their planned presentation, which I post in this space. So, in the weeks to come, posts in this space will primarily be content from my students flagging the (always cutting-edge) topics they are exploring. And here is the first of these summary posts with links:

Marijuana is increasingly legalized at the state level, yet its strict Schedule I classification at the federal level means banks and ancillary businesses will not work with cannabis companies on the premise of not accepting “illegal income.” As such, the multi-billion-dollar cannabis industry is a predominantly cash-based industry. My paper will analyze the consequences of this cash-based industry on payroll for cannabis-related businesses, looking at the tax and employment risks of not having a paper trail and required manual accounting.

For tax issues, incorrect reporting can result in IRS audits and financial penalties. Payroll is already complicated to calculate, as it includes anything going towards employee costs, including salary, pensions, health insurance, retirement plans, and more. Not only can a cannabis business not deduct these payroll costs from their taxable income, they often sometimes face a 10% penalty for paying these taxes in cash, hurting their pockets even more.

For employment issues, FLSA compliance requires paper trails for payments and hours worked, which becomes harder to manage when payroll systems will not work with cannabis companies. A lack of a paper trail and a lack of sufficient employee management systems available increase employment litigation risks of overtime wage payments and inadequate compliance with FLSA meal break and other requirements.

Possible future solutions include legislative reclassification to Schedule III and the SAFER Act, both of which would increase access to banks for cannabis-related issues and minimize, though not eliminate, a lot of payroll concerns.

Background Reading

Safe Harbor Financial, How Do Cannabis Companies Bank? – A Quick Guide to Financing (March 23, 2023).

Alexander Saeedy, The Big Problem for Marijuana Companies? What to Do With All That Cash, The Wall Street Journal (April 1, 2024).

James R. Hagerty, The Complicated, Risky—but Potentially Lucrative—Business of Selling Cannabis, The Wall Street Journal (October 3, 2023).

Andra DelMonico, Legal Pay Practices: Can I Be Paid in Cash?, Super Lawyers (August 13, 2025).

Benjamin Moses Leff, Tax Planning for Marijuana Dealers, 99 Iowa L. Rev. 523, 530-34 (January 2014).

Deborah L. Dickson, Bank on Marijuana: A Legitimate Industry Warranting Banking Access, 2 Savannah L. Rev. 459, 459-81, 514-22 (2015).

  • Posted in:
    Cannabis
  • Blog:
    Marijuana Law, Policy & Reform
  • Organization:
    Law Professor Blogs Network
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo