Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Political Law Quarterly – Q1 2026

By Warren F. "Jay" Myers, Sydney Goldberg & Timothy Shyu on March 11, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Table of Contents

  • What Is a Super PAC, Anyways?
  • Compliance Checklist for the Quarter
  • Development to Watch: Expanding State Pay-to-Play Rules
  • Where We See Problems Arise
  • A Final Thought

Political activities sit at the intersection of law, policy, and reputation. Companies operating in highly regulated industries cannot avoid political law issues, and it is frequently more complex than expected.

This quarterly newsletter highlights a few practical issues we are seeing with clients and a handful of developments worth keeping on the radar.

If you would like to receive our next quarterly newsletter and future alerts, please click here to subscribe to our Political Law distribution list.


Link to What Is a Super PAC, Anyways? What Is a Super PAC, Anyways?

Contrary to what its name may imply, a so-called “super PAC” is not a traditional political action committee (PAC) with extra fundraising or spending power. In fact, super PACs are often defined by their limitations. They cannot make direct political contributions to candidates or even coordinate with candidates or political parties. Despite these limitations, super PACs are increasingly common due to a key concept: independent expenditures.

An independent expenditure is a political communication, such as a paid TV ad, that supports or opposes a candidate and is made independently by super PACs (i.e., without any coordination with the candidate’s campaign or political party). Because the expenditures are made without coordination, they are considered a form of protected political speech. As a result, there are far fewer legal restrictions on how super PACs can raise money and how much they can spend advocating for or against candidates. For example, companies are often banned from making direct contributions to candidates from corporate treasury funds, but no such limitation exists for donations to super PACs.

Super PACs are “super” because the unlimited political funds they raise and spend are considered “political speech” and subject to less restrictions.


Link to Compliance Checklist for the Quarter Compliance Checklist for the Quarter

A few practical reminders as the year begins.

  1. Review Contribution Policies
    Many companies have political contribution policies on paper that are not consistently operationalized. Make sure procedures for pre-clearance and reporting are actually being followed.
  2. Confirm PAC Reporting Calendars
    Corporate PACs often operate on different reporting schedules depending on activity levels. Confirm that reporting calendars reflect current obligations.
  3. Update Lobbying Registrations
    Companies that lobby in multiple states should verify that registration renewals and reporting requirements are current across jurisdictions.
  4. Evaluate Pay-to-Play Exposure
    Companies with government contracts or investment adviser exposure should periodically review political contribution activity for potential pay-to-play implications.

Link to Development to Watch: Expanding State Pay-to-Play Rules Development to Watch: Expanding State Pay-to-Play Rules

More states are examining restrictions on political contributions tied to government contracting or financial relationships with public entities. While these rules vary widely, the overall trend is toward greater scrutiny.

For companies operating across multiple states, the practical challenge is not a single rule but the patchwork of overlapping regimes.


Link to Where We See Problems Arise Where We See Problems Arise

Most compliance issues do not stem from intentional misconduct. They arise from structure.

Typically:

  • Government affairs teams drive political activity.
  • Legal departments manage regulatory risk.
  • Political compliance frequently sits somewhere between those functions.

Without a centralized system, responsibilities can become fragmented and key tasks can slip through the cracks.

Common problem areas include:

  • Missed registration renewals.
  • Untracked executive political contributions.
  • Inconsistent documentation of event sponsorships.
  • Delayed reporting of lobbying activity.

A disciplined process, supported by clear policies and responsibilities, can prevent most of these issues from escalating into enforcement actions, negative press, or business disruptions.


Link to A Final Thought A Final Thought

Political compliance is rarely an area where companies want to spend their time, but in regulated industries, it is part of the operating environment.

Handled well, it becomes routine infrastructure.

Handled poorly, it can quickly become a distraction.

If you have questions about any of the issues above, or if you would like to walk through your current compliance framework, feel free to reach out.

We’re always happy to talk and to partner with you on building a practical political compliance structure that works for your organization.

Photo of Warren F. "Jay" Myers Warren F. "Jay" Myers

Jay assists clients in heavily regulated industries, including health care, energy, insurance, emerging industries, and data privacy. He provides both regulatory legal advice and government relations strategies. Jay’s past and current clients include Fortune 10 companies, startups, nonprofits, industry associations, and advocacy groups.

Jay assists clients in heavily regulated industries, including health care, energy, insurance, emerging industries, and data privacy. He provides both regulatory legal advice and government relations strategies. Jay’s past and current clients include Fortune 10 companies, startups, nonprofits, industry associations, and advocacy groups. Recognizing that state government matters are often complex and multifaceted, he utilizes regulatory guidance, government advocacy, or both in tandem to deliver tailored solutions for each client’s unique needs.

Read more about Warren F. "Jay" MyersEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Sydney Goldberg Sydney Goldberg

Sydney is an associate in the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group. She has additional experience assisting with corporate transactions and finance matters.

Read more about Sydney GoldbergEmail
Photo of Timothy Shyu Timothy Shyu

Timothy is an associate in the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement Practice Group.

Read more about Timothy ShyuEmail
  • Posted in:
    Corporate Governance and Compliance, Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    Regulatory Oversight
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo