Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

FTC Reverts to Long-Standing HSR Reporting Requirements

By Benjamin H. Diessel, Gabriella E. Bensur, Jessica Puterman & Adam Silverman on March 27, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

UPDATE: On the heels of the Fifth Circuit’s order declining a stay, the FTC, along with the Department of Justice (DOJ), has launched a public inquiry regarding the effectiveness of the New Rules.  The FTC announced that it continues to believe that the Old Rules are insufficient, and seeks public input on potential areas for further refinement of the rules in an effort to reduce the burden for non-problematic transactions while ensuring the rules are sufficiently rigorous.  Per the FTC website, comments can be submitted at Regulations.gov and must be received by May 26, 2026.

The FTC has reverted its Hart-Scott-Rodino (“HSR”) premerger reporting requirements to the pre-February 2025 form.

In February 2025, the FTC instituted new, more burdensome reporting requirements on parties to a merger or acquisition (“New Rules”).  But last month, a Texas federal district court vacated the New Rules, holding that the FTC lacked authority to promulgate the requirements and that the requirements were arbitrary and capricious.  As Wiggin and Dana reported at the time, the Fifth Circuit granted an initial emergency stay of the district court’s order, allowing time for the FTC to appeal the order.

Despite initially granting a short-term stay, on March 19, 2026, the Fifth Circuit issued an order declining to stay the District Court’s order while the FTC’s appeal of that order is pending.  Accordingly, the district court’s order vacating the New Rules is now in effect.  The FTC announced that it will now accept HSR filings under either the pre-February 2025 form (the “Old Rules”) or the New Rules.

The Fifth Circuit must still decide the merits of the FTC’s appeal, and could theoretically reinstate the New Rules, though that is unlikely.  Wiggin and Dana will continue to monitor and provide updates regarding this developing matter.

Wiggin and Dana routinely advises clients in connection with the full range of antitrust matters, including in connection with HSR premerger reporting requirements.

Photo of Benjamin H. Diessel Benjamin H. Diessel

Ben is a Partner in Wiggin and Dana’s Litigation Department, chair of the firm’s Antitrust and Technology Disputes Practice Group, and a founding member of the firm’s Standard Essential Patent Licensing and Litigation Practice Group.

Read more about Benjamin H. DiesselEmailBenjamin H.'s Linkedin Profile
Photo of Gabriella E. Bensur Gabriella E. Bensur

Gabriella is a Partner in Wiggin and Dana’s Litigation Department and a member of the firm’s Antitrust and Technology Disputes Practice Group.

Read more about Gabriella E. BensurEmailGabriella E.'s Linkedin Profile
Photo of Jessica Puterman Jessica Puterman

Jessica is an Associate in Wiggin and Dana’s Litigation Department and a member of the firm’s Antitrust and Technology Disputes Practice Group.

Read more about Jessica PutermanEmailJessica's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Adam Silverman Adam Silverman

Adam is a Partner in Wiggin and Dana’s Corporate Department.

Read more about Adam SilvermanEmailAdam's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Blog of Reason
  • Organization:
    Wiggin and Dana LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo