Organizations across industries are incorporating or evaluating AI to improve workflow, increase productivity, and reduce costs. The Federal Government is doing the same. The Department of Defense has taken an especially assertive approach, issuing an AI Strategy earlier this year that outlines seven “Pace-Setting Projects” to accelerate AI development and deployment in support of DoD missions.

The government’s rapid adoption of AI creates significant opportunities for companies seeking to market and sell AI solutions. However, entering the federal AI market requires a clear understanding of the evolving legal, regulatory, and policy framework. Failure to comply can delay market entry or result in lost opportunities.

Recent controversy involving AI developer Anthropic highlights how politically and commercially sensitive this space has become. Companies pursuing federal AI contracts must be prepared to demonstrate neutrality, transparency, and compliance with emerging federal standards and directives. A disciplined understanding of the governing rules, combined with proactive contingency planning, will better position organizations to compete effectively in the federal AI marketplace.

Read more in Philip Lee’s article for the Government Contractor.

Photo of Philip Lee Philip Lee

Philip Lee represents government contractors in a broad range of industries including professional services, information technology, and aerospace in bid protests, investigations, contract claims, including terminations for convenience and default, and disputes between subcontractors and prime contractors. He leverages his legal experience and…

Philip Lee represents government contractors in a broad range of industries including professional services, information technology, and aerospace in bid protests, investigations, contract claims, including terminations for convenience and default, and disputes between subcontractors and prime contractors. He leverages his legal experience and practical knowledge to assist companies with the review and analysis of federal and state solicitations, compliance with federal procurement regulations and related statutes, including small business regulations and issues, and the preparation and negotiation of teaming agreements, joint venture agreements, and subcontracts.

Prior to joining the firm, Philip was an attorney-advisor for the Department of Homeland Security where he provided legal advice and recommendations on a variety of procurement matters including research and development, tests, and evaluation activities performed by public and private sector entities. He also previously served as a contracting officer with the Department of the Interior and was responsible for ensuring contracts, modifications, and both government and contractor performance were compliant with statutory law, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), and appropriations law.

Philip’s previous experience as both a government attorney and contracting officer provides a unique government contracts perspective to government contractors.  This includes real-world experience in all aspects of the procurement cycle, from pre-solicitation to contract award and administration.  Philip’s practical experience in federal procurement was further augmented while serving as an attorney-advisor where he counseled contracting officers with solicitation and pre-award reviews as well as defending bid protests before the Government Accountability Office.  Philip’s unique insight provides a valuable perspective to government contractors and their procurement issues.